fbpx

July 28, 2009

Reflecting on my Jew-ish journey

It seemed pretty obvious that the week before last wouldn’t really be my last at The Jewish Journal.

After packing up my desk, I still needed to pen my reflections on being a Christian reporter for a Jewish newspaper. And, not surprisingly, I struggled to get it done.

So last Tuesday I turned in my final version, slipped into the office to see a story on the page for the final time and grabbed the three boxes I’d left behind.

The first-person piece, “My So-Called Jewish Life,” ran Thursday. I think I’ve only done this once before—not coincidentally when I celebrated Yom Kippur for the first time—but I’m going to republish the entire article below.

Here goes:

Should I tell him I’m not a Jew? I wondered this over and over as I sat in the Cal State Long Beach office of academia’s leading anti-Semite.

People make many assumptions about a reporter named Greenberg who lives in Los Angeles and writes for The Jewish Journal. Maybe, I wondered, Kevin MacDonald, a professor whose books on Jews have been compared to “Mein Kampf” and “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” would speak more freely if he knew I was, in fact, a practicing Christian.

But then I thought about the personal setback I would be subjecting myself to for the sake, possibly, of a few good quotes.

I’d been writing for The Journal for a year, and while I was open about being a churchgoing Christian — my father, a Jew, and my mother, who was raised Catholic, both converted to Protestantism when I was a kid — I was adamant in my belief that the Jewish story was also my family’s story, that purpose and promise and persecution link my ancestors to Moses and Einstein and the Beastie Boys.

So I kept quiet. I let the professor think of me whatever he was inclined to think. As the interview progressed, I realized the disclosure would not have mattered to MacDonald. But it certainly would have mattered to me.

When, in 2007, I joined The Journal — which I am leaving now to enter law school at UCLA — the impetus was as personal as it was professional. Sure, I saw an opportunity to advance my career — and having received some top honors from the Los Angeles Press Club during my time here, including best blog and journalist of the year, I’d say the Prophets couldn’t have promised anything more. But, maybe more importantly, I thought the move would help me sort out my complicated Judeo-Christian identity.

I typically observe Passover in a church, and growing up in a San Diego suburb, the extent of my Jewish upbringing was being the target of money jokes. Despite having three Jewish grandparents, including both grandmothers, and facial hair that draws comparisons to Matisyahu, I was, at best, Jew-ish.

But at The Jewish Journal I began working on my Yiddish tongue; I went to Yom Kippur services for the first time. I traveled to Israel and even got hassled by El Al security screeners; I observed Shabbat in Sderot and experienced the terror of hearing a red alert and having only a few seconds to run for a bomb shelter; I haggled at a market (OK, I was already pretty good at that); and I learned that I had an incredible amount more in common with the Jews I was sojourning among than the gentiles I grew up with.

There was speculation among a few colleagues that my joining this paper was an indication that a Prodigal Son was coming home. But this had not been my father’s house for more than two decades. And not everyone welcomed me back.

“The ‘Jewish’ journal continues to employ this Christian with a Jewish name to tell us about Jews,” a reader of my blog, The God Blog, wrote in one of a handful of similar comments in 2007. “How ‘bout this: let the JJ change its name to the ‘Apostate Journal,’ and BG can change his name to Christian Berg.”

Those sentiments didn’t surprise me. In fact, I had assumed such opposition would be prevalent, and when Journal Editor-in-Chief Rob Eshman contacted me at the Los Angeles Daily News and asked me to lunch, I quickly let him know that he might want to move on to a candidate who better fit the bill.

“It’s OK,” he responded. “Some of my best friends aren’t Jewish.”

Still, I had no illusions about the insider-outsider place I would occupy in the community. Nevertheless, I found that most readers evaluated me by the quality of my work, not by the fact that, much like most L.A. Jews, I didn’t daven daily.

I didn’t struggle with the alphabet soup of Jewish communal life — with discerning JVS (Jewish Vocational Service) from JFS (Jewish Family Service) from JFL (Jewish Free Loan) — but remembering all the holidays … oy. I also found that there is much more to understanding the Jewish community than just being able to differentiate between an eruv and a mikveh.

Never was this more apparent than when I visited the Jewish State.

Not all Jews, I learned, looked like me: poor-sighted, fair-skinned, curly haired. In Los Angeles you could go years without running into a Jew who wasn’t either from Eastern Europe or Iran. But the breadth of diversity in Israel — where Jews arrive from India and Ethiopia and Australia and China and Argentina — pushed aside everything I thought I knew about who is a Jew, and what it means to be a Jew, and what it is to live a Jewish life.

Whether writing about the fragility of life in Israel or economic pressures on Jewish communal life or L.A.’s Jewish hoops hero, Jordan Farmar, I met Jews who had grown up with a strong identity and those just developing one; Jews who were Jews in name only and others who considered themselves Jewish only when others wanted them to be; Jews who felt a God-given obligation to defend the faith and those who felt just as strong a responsibility to reform it.

Like Los Angeles itself, I found that Jewish life is a vast landscape, ranging from sandy beaches to snow-capped mountains, from hardscrabble desert to dense forest. It’s a place where even a Christian named Greenberg could find a home.

I’m not a Messianic or a Jew for Jesus. I’ve never pretended to be a partial practitioner of Judaism. But I’ve also found that I deeply appreciate Jewish life — the commitment to community-building and supporting the less fortunate, to education and culture, to reading and writing, to remembering God.

Pretty early during my employment at The Journal, I realized how to definitively answer the question I had gotten so used to hearing: “Are you Jewish?”

“Well,” I would say, “that really depends on who’s asking.”

The issue of Jewish identity is, after all, a thousands-year-old debate; I don’t expect to be the answer.

I’m happy to be accepted by those who can accept me, but I understand if you can’t. Personally, I don’t think I could feel more Jewish. Except for that whole faith-in-Jesus thing. And he is kind of a deal-breaker.

Reflecting on my Jew-ish journey Read More »

Catching up with Wolowitz

After last week’s Emmy nod for nerd-tastic “Big Bang Theory”—a sitcom that revolves around two Caltech physics professors who share an apartment, their equally geeky friends and a wannabe actress who lives next door—GeekHeeb caught up with series creator Chuck Lorre (“Two and a Half Men”) and actor Simon Helberg at Comic-Con to discuss the show’s Jewish characters: Howard Wolowitz, a Caltech engineer/ romantic loser who still lives at home with his never-seen, overbearing Jewish mother, known only as Ms. Wolowitz.

Lorre says that Wolowitz is based on his own Jewish background as well as that of Helberg.

“Things are loud in a Jewish household. Conversations are up here,” Lorre said, lifting his hand above his head, “they’re pitched pretty high. That’s just the way we talk. Other people go, ‘Why are you yelling?’ I’m not yelling; I’m making a point! That was the fun of creating that off-camera mother. That’s how communication happens in some households, and it’s normal in that house.”

Lorre says he didn’t think anything of the communication style in his home growing up until he had dinner for the first time with a non-Jewish family.

“They said, ‘Could you please pass the butter?’ I said, ‘Why are you whispering?’”

Helberg, who plays Wolowitz, says that his character and the mother are reflective of trends in Jewish society today—how one generation’s experiences and values don’t always mesh with the other.

“He’s really into science. You don’t how he feels about religion. He’s more cutting-edge, questioning things and breaking away. His mother is more of the old school,” Helberg said.

As far as the Jewish elements he feels he brings to the role: “Well, my nose,” joked Helberg, who had his bar mitzvah at University Synagogue in Westwood, where he still attends High Holy Days services.

While Wolowitz’s mother (played by Carol Ann Susi) has more than made her presence known (even if we don’t see her), we have yet to hear from Mr. Wolowitz.

That could change this year. Lorre says Ringo Starr is being considered for the part of the father.

And when last we left the cast of “Big Bang Theory” at the end of season two, Wolowitz, Leonard (Johnny Galecki) and Raj (Kunal Nayyar) had followed Sheldon (Emmy-nominee Jim Parsons) to the North Magnetic Pole to help during a three-month mission to prove the validity of string theory. When the series picks up again on Sept. 21, Lorre said the four will freak when they realize they’ve missed out on Comic-Con and the recent “Star Trek” film.

As far as the possibility of Wolowitz heading off to the high-tech Jewish state for a limelight episode in the near future, Lorre said he prefers keeping the characters together. 

“It’s a good idea, but we’re really more involved right now with the intimate relationships – romantic, friendship and family,” he said. “We’re keeping it really small.”

Catching up with Wolowitz Read More »

My Daughter, the Best-Selling Novelist

By the way, have I mentioned that my 19-year-old daughter’s novel is a bestseller?  “>struggling to stay sane and grounded in the Los Angeles fast lane.  The talent, and more than a little discipline, was writing a bitingly funny first chapter, plus a story outline, that turned the publishing executive’s “Why don’t you send me something?” into a deal.

It took two years to get from there to publication. When the executive had a falling-out with the publishing house, it was more good luck that Izzy’s manuscript was championed by a terrific editor there, who guided her through a year of revisions, proving E.B. White’s adage that “the best writing is rewriting.” *

Actually, I don’t really know how the book evolved; Izzy didn’t show the manuscript to anyone but her editor until it was in bound galleys.  That this caused me a certain amount of nervousness is captured by another writing adage: “Write what you know.”

First novels, especially young authors’ first novels, tend toward memoir.  How fictionalized would Hancock Park turn out to be?  After all, that’s the real name of the Los Angeles neighborhood where I live, and where my daughter grew up and went to school.  Was it so farfetched to imagine that other aspects of real life – like, oh, the time I promised her a cat but then welched on the deal – would also make their way into the book?  And if the cat was fair game, what about all the other things, big and small, that happen inside a family?  And what if those things weren’t viewed from my, you know, mature and generous parental perspective, but were seen instead by a gimlet adolescent eye? 

This anxiety prompted more than a few euphemistic pronouncements from me, during the year of rewrites, about the wonderful opportunities that writers of fiction have to make things up, to be sprung from the constraints of autobiography, to let the characters take the story in unexpected directions.  A roman à clef, I breezily observed, wasn’t nearly as interesting as a novel made from whole cloth.

It wasn’t hard for Izzy to hear my pleading subtext.  “Don’t worry, Dad,” she finally said, intending to quell my fears.  “In the book, when the parents split up, the father takes up with a hottie half his age.  No one would possibly think that was you.”  I guess I had that coming.

On the other hand, her friends’ reaction to hearing that a novel was coming turned out to be mainly a hopeful, “Am I in it?”  Even among blasé Hollywood kids, many of whose parents are boldfaced names, it’s apparently more fun to be able to say about the mean girls in the story, “That’s me!” than to hear that the characters are composites.

I suspect that the biggest reason to want to claim that a character is you is the possibility that the book will end up as a movie or television series.  The question Izzy has probably been asked most frequently during her promotional outings has been, “Who would play you?”  She always explains patiently that the book’s narrator isn’t her, it’s a character, though when pressed she sometimes mentions Dakota Fanning (she played Tom Cruise’s daughter in Stephen Spielberg’s War of the Worlds).  No one’s asked me who would play me, but just in case a casting director should want my input, rather than explaining that the Dad isn’t really me, I’m compiling a list of balding boomer hunks.

A few pages into reading my daughter’s novel for the first time, my fear of being nailed by merciless prose melted away.  What replaced it was wry laughter, and identification with the narrator’s outsider sensibility, and absorption in the story, and above all the feeling, Hey, this is a really good writer.  Perhaps, as the father of the author, I’m inherently incapable of having an objective view of something like that.  That’s why it’s fortunate also to have the marketplace’s opinion.  Speaking of which, have I told you that Hancock Park made the bestseller list?

UPDATE: *A phrase in this paragraph originally said that most of the executive’s books were cancelled; according to the executive, this is incorrect: only one or two were.

Marty Kaplan is the Norman Lear professor of entertainment, media and society at the USC Annenberg School for Communication.  Reach him at {encode=”martyk@jewishjournal.com” title=”martyk@jewishjournal.com”}.

My Daughter, the Best-Selling Novelist Read More »

Humility and Apologies Before Tisha B’av,by Rabbi Lopatin

On this week of Tish’a B’av, I want to write in a different tone.  Yes,  I do believe firmly in working on Kiddush Hashem, and avoiding Chilul Hashem.  I said my piece last week.  This time I want to apologize to anyone I might have hurt by the tone of my message.  In writing this blog, sometimes I fall into the trap of being sensational and YELLING my point.  But I understand, that especially when being critical of my brothers and sisters, I need to be humble and modest , avoiding any sarcasm and certainly not relishing in critique.  The truth is that if the message is right and true, it will get heard without being “in your face” and sensational.  I was happy that my ideas were picked up by many different outlets, but I feel that since it was a message of rebuke, tocheicha, I need to work harder to make sure not to feel even one shemetz – one iota – of satisfaction of taking on a community and its leadership.  I just hope that despite just being a small pulpit rabbi in Chicago, people are listening.  And I thank the Los Angeles Jewish Journal for hosting our blog, as well as Vos Iz Neis for picking up these blogs over the past week.
At the same time, I am gratified that beyond the issues of Hilul Hashem and Kiddush Hashem, the invitation to Me’ah She’arim from USA Yated Neeman editor Rabbi Pinchas Lipschutz was sincere, and we have been in touch, and I look forward to meeting with him, and eventually being in Me’ah She’arim together.  This is a new relationship with a leader in the Yeshivishe world that I hope to foster, and I am grateful for it.
Moreover, from the idea of the invitation to Me’ah She’arim, I am working on an Achdus Mission to Israel.  The mission should include rabbis from the spectrum of Orthodoxy, and should visit institutions and communities in Israel from the spectrum of Orthodoxy: from those in Me’ah She’arim to those in the Old City to those outside and part of Modern Orthodoxy in Israel.  There have been a lot of emails of people excited about joining such a mission, and while it seems like it will be a challenge, I believe it is doable.
On the background of all the apparent Hillul Hashem of the past weeks and months – of course we don’t know who is guilty of what and to what extent and the circumstances that led to their alleged actions – I call for all of us to come together.  I know Rav Yosef called for unity of all Jews committed to Judaism, and I agree with that as well, maybe we at Morethodoxy can be a catalyst to bring Orthodoxy together and to show that world that as much as we disagree vehemently, we can come together in mutual respect, and work toward the mutual good of Torah, Shem Hashem and Am Yisrael.
Perhaps, with God’s help, we are moving in the right direction as we head for the sad time when we Jews all over the world will sit together on the floor and try to find a way of “renewing our days as of old”.
May this Tish’a B’av move us to a time where there won’t be any more mourning for our People, a time of appreciating for each other which we all deserve.
Asher Lopatin

Humility and Apologies Before Tisha B’av,by Rabbi Lopatin Read More »

Gentiles and Kiddush Hashem – Rabbi Barry Gelman

I have spent the last week in Camp Moshava in Honesdale, Pennsylvania. Being here has been a real treat. Camp Moshava is a living breathing “kiddush Hashem”. One of the many outstanding aspects of my experience thus far has been the wide variety of orthodox Jews that work here.

I mention Kiddush Hashem because, except for my experience here this week, my thoughts have been on the tremendous chillul Hashem created by the Rabbis arrested last week for offenses ranging form money laundering to human organ trafficking.

I have no doubt that the actions that these rabbis have been accused of have done enormous damage to the perception of Torah. I am deeply concerned that these actions will create doubt and cynicism in the hearts and minds of young people towards religious leadership. One way to combat these outcomes is for the Modern Orthodox community to clearly state that these actions were wrong and that the greed that led to them is not in keeping with a spiritually sensitive Judaism.

Rabbi Aaron Lichtenstein coined the term “glatt kosher hedonism” to refer to the belief (desire) that observant Jews can have it all. Our communities, the Modern Orthodox, pride ourselves on appreciating what is good, wholesome and spiritually fortifying in general culture. In doing so, we run the risk of letting our guard down in the pursuit of having it all. So as not to allow this tragedy to go without any positive outcome, our communities need reiterate the importance of Zniut – modesty in the way we live.

I will conclude with two brief notes that were emailed to me recently in reaction to the scandal.

Rabbi Riskin mentioned a number of times that when he still lived in New York and was starting his own yeshiva high school (”Mesivta Ohr Torah” in Riverdale), he interviewed 17 candidates for the job of Rosh Yeshiva.  After ascertaining all knew how to learn, he asked them, “Suppose you ordered by mail an electric shaver from Alexander’s Department Store.  And instead of one shaver being delivered, 3 shavers were delivered.  What would you do with the other two?”  Rabbi Riskin reported that sixteen of the seventeen insisted that they keep the other two shavers because stealing for a gentile is permitted.

The last applicant (Rabbi Moshe Chaim Sosefsky who is now the Rosh Hayeshivah of Yeshivat Ohr Yerushalayim) insisted on returning the shaver quoting Bava Metzia Perek 2 Yerushalmi: Rabbi Shimon Ben-Shetach bought a donkey from an arab. When RSBS was removed from the seller, he noticed there was something in the saddle: a valuable diamond whose sale would have put RSBS on easy street for the rest of his life.  But RSBS insisted on returning the diamond to the arab as it would be better for the gentile to bless the G-d of Shimon Ben-Shetach than for Shimon Ben-Shetach to obtain any financial benefit such as this.

The following, written by Rabbi Moses ben Jacob of Coucy, authoer of the Sefer MItzvot Gadol on positive Mitzvah # 74 is very timely.

And I have already expounded to Galus Yerushalayim in Spain (Sefarad) and the other Galuyos under Christianity (Edom), that now that the Galus has lasted too long a Jew must separate himself from the frivolities (Hevlei) of the world and grasp the seal of Ha’Kadosh Baruch Hu, which is Truth, and not lie, neither to Jews nor to non-Jews, nor to deceive them in any matter, and to sanctify ourselves even in that which is permissible to us, as it says

(Tzefani’a 3:13): “The remnant of Israel will not commit foul deeds nor speak falsehoods, nor will there be found in their mouths treacherous tongues.” And then, when Ha’Kadosh Baruch Hu comes to redeem us the non-Jews will say that He is just in doing so, for we are men of truth and Toras Emes is in our mouths.

But if we conduct ourselves towards the non-Jews with deceit (Rama’us), then they will say: “See what Ha’Kadosh Baruch Hu has done, that He has chosen as His portion thieves and cheats.”

Furthermore, it is written (Hoshe’a 2:25): “And I will plant them in the earth.” Why does a person plant a measure of grain in the earth? In order to cultivate several measures. So too Ha’Kadosh Baruch Hu planted Yisroel in the various lands so that converts would join us. As long as we conduct ourselves amongst them with deceit who will cling to us? And, we find that

Ha’Kadosh Baruch Hu was upset even by theft from evildoers, as it says(Bereishis 6:11): ” And the land was filled with theft (Chamas).”

Further, I bring proof from the Yerushalmi Chapter Eilu Metzi’os (Halocho 5), where it says: “The elder rabbis (Rabbanan Savi’ai) bought a measure of grain from non-Jews and found within it a bundle of money. They returned it to them, and the non-Jews said: ‘Blessed is the G-d of the Jews.’” Many similar stories of lost items that were returned to non-Jews because of Kiddush Hashem are related there.

Gentiles and Kiddush Hashem – Rabbi Barry Gelman Read More »

North Carolina crew charged with plotting ‘violent jihad’

Last week, Long Island boy Bryant Vinas pleaded guilty to terrorism charges. This week it was a North Carolina father and son, and a few others, who were charged with planning “violent jihad” against the United States. From the Daily Mail:

The group was led by Daniel Patrick Boyd, a married 39-year-old who lived in an unassuming lakeside home in a rural area south of Raleigh, where he and his family walked their dog and operated a drywall business, federal authorities added.

But two decades ago, Boyd, who is a US citizen, trained in terrorist camps in Pakistan and Afghanistan and fought against the Soviets for three years before returning to the United States.

No specific terrorist plans or targets overseas are listed in the charge sheet released yesterday, although it claims some of the defendants traveled to Israel in 2007 with the intent of waging ‘violent jihad’ and returned home without success.

‘These charges hammer home the point that terrorists and their supporters are not confined to the remote regions of some far away land but can grow and fester right here at home,’ US Attorney George E.B. Holding said.

He would not give details of the alleged plots beyond what was in a news release and indictment.

The seven men made their first court appearances in Raleigh on Monday, charged with providing material support to terrorism.

The New York Times has the full text of the indictment against Boyd et al. Read it here. I’m going to be blogging more about this story for GetReligion later today, so stay tuned.

North Carolina crew charged with plotting ‘violent jihad’ Read More »

Rabbis’ lawyers blame woes on government mole

Attorneys for several rabbis facing money-laundering charges in the widespread New Jersey corruption case are insisting their clients are innocent victims of manipulation by Solomon Dwek, a real estate developer looking to minimize his own legal problems by assisting investigators.

Their comments pit prominent leaders of the Syrian-Jewish communities of Brooklyn and Deal against the son of another community leader in a case that has brought intense and unwanted scrutiny on a group that values its traditions and tight communal bonds.

Dwek, who was charged but never tried in 2006 with scheming to defraud PNC Bank of $50 million, is the son of Rabbi Isaac Dwek, who founded the Deal Yeshiva and heads the Synagogue of Deal.

Although federal officials have declined to identify the younger Dwek by name, he is widely believed to be the government’s “cooperating witness” in the crackdown on corruption and money laundering that netted prominent New Jersey mayors, state legislators and other politicos in addition to at least five rabbis and numerous associates.

Authorities said they uncovered a network that laundered “at least tens of millions of dollars through charitable, nonprofit entities” and operated between Brooklyn, Israel and the Syrian-Jewish enclaves.

Most of 44 individuals arrested in the July 23 roundup were public officials, including the mayors of Hoboken, Secaucus, and Ridgefield, state Assembly members, and City Council members from various parts of New Jersey.

They face corruption charges unrelated to the arrests in the Jewish communities—but in most cases linked by their alleged association with Dwek, who offered bribes and recorded damaging conversations in his role as government mole.

Acting U.S. Attorney Ralph Marra Jr. announced the arrests at a crowded news conference with more than 100 media outlets in attendance.

Among the rabbis placed in custody and now released on bail are Eliahu Ben Haim of Long Branch, the principal rabbi of Ohel Yaacob Synagogue in Deal; Saul Kassin of Congregation Zion synagogue in Brooklyn, who is considered the chief rabbi of the Syrian-Jewish community; Rabbi Edmund Nahum of Deal; and Mordechai Fish, a rabbi at Congregation Sheves Achim in Brooklyn.

Ben Haim, Kassin, Nahum and Fish each were charged with laundering proceeds derived from criminal activity, as was Fish’s brother, Rabbi Lavel Schwartz of Brooklyn.

According to the criminal complaints, the rabbis laundered approximately $3 million between June 2007 and this July on behalf of Dwek.

Marra called the corruption “widespread and pervasive.”

But in conversations with The New Jersey Jewish News after the rabbis were released on bond, several attorneys insisted their clients were not guilty.

“Rabbi Nahum was not involved in any illicit activity as described,” said his counsel, Justin Walder.

Walder is also representing the mayor of Hoboken, Peter Cammarano III, who is facing bribery charges unrelated to the money laundering.

The lawyer wasted no time in attacking Dwek’s motive of allegedly coercing federal investigation targets in the Syrian-Jewish community into wrongdoing.

“It is apparent from what we have seen that the rabbi was taken advantage of by a man he has known for a very long time,” Walder said. “We intend to establish [that] the basic decency and goodness of Rabbi Nahum was utilized by a person seeking to be absolved for his substantial wrongful conduct by implicating others.”

Michael Bachner, a Manhattan attorney representing Fish, took a similar stance in attacking Dwek’s actions.

“Rabbi Fish was duped and manipulated by Mr. Dwek into business transactions which Rabbi Fish believed were wholly legitimate,” Bachner said. “Dwek used the sterling reputation of his own family to assure Rabbi Fish that the transactions were legitimate.”

“Rabbi Kassin asserts his innocence,” said Kassin’s attorney, Robert Stahl, in an interview with Bloomberg.com.

The 87-year-old Kassin is accused of trafficking in counterfeit Prada and Gucci handbags as well as money laundering.

“It’s a shame that he’s caught up in some misunderstanding,” said Stahl. “Despite his difficult circumstances, he remains confident that the system of justice will prevail.”

Attorneys for other defendants could not be reached by press time.

Federal prosecutors are alleging that Ben Haim received checks that ranged in value “from tens of thousands dollars up to $160,000,” made payable to a charity associated with his synagogue in Deal.

The Monmouth County beachfront community is a summertime destination for many members of Brooklyn’s 75,000-strong Syrian-Jewish community who own homes there.

Marra said the cooperating witness “was able to pick up the cash and bring it back to Rabbi Ben Haim. Rabbi Ben Haim would give him back approximately 90 percent of the face value of the bank check.”

According to the complaint, the checks came to Ben Haim from an unnamed business associate in Israel, “who he had worked with for years.”

“The rings were international in scope, connected to Brooklyn, Deal, Israel and Switzerland,” said Marra. “They trafficked in cleaning dirty money from all over the world.”

The complaint said another Israeli who is under arrest, Levi Deutsch, “was a high-level source of cash from overseas.”

Other “similar circles of money launderers” operated separately in Brooklyn and Deal “but occasionally co-mingled activities and participants,” the prosecutor said.

“In most cases the rings were led by rabbis who used charitable, nonprofit entities connected to their synagogues to ‘wash’ money they understood came from illegal activities,” said a press release issued by Marra’s office.

According to Marra, prosecutors have airtight evidence, including audio and video recordings of their witness soliciting and receiving bribes.

Attorneys for the rabbis are already preparing strategies to discredit those recordings.

“Conversations in which one party knows he or she is recording another person can be very much the subject of interpretation,” said Walder. “People doing this to benefit themselves sometimes have an agenda and may be feeding and making statements to the individual that can be ambiguous and misinterpreted. There is a whole area of forensic analysis which well documents the ability of a person knowingly recording an unsuspecting person to manipulate the discussion.”

“All I can say is Rabbi Fish is grateful that the transactions are taped. This ensures accuracy and prevents Dwek from continuing to fabricate,” said Bachner. “We are confident that once the entire relationship is understood and the tapes are explained in context, a jury will conclude that Dwek manipulated a man who loved and trusted Dwek’s family.”

Law enforcement officials were careful to deflect charges of bias.

“The fact that we arrested a number of rabbis this morning does not make this a religiously motivated case. Nor does the fact that we arrested political officials make this a politically motivated case,” said Waysan Dun, the special agent in charge of Newark’s FBI office. “It is about a shocking betrayal of the public trust.”

“Of course it is not religious-related,” Marra said after the news conference. “It is a group of criminals hiding behind a facade of being religious leaders in order to commit crimes.”

In a separate complaint that grew out of the probe, federal officials are charging a Brooklyn man, Levy Itzak Rosenbaum, with trafficking in the sale of human kidneys.

“He would pay people desperate for money $10,000 to donate a kidney, then charge recipients $160,000 for the kidney,” Marra charged. The complaint said Rosenbaum has been brokering kidneys for the past 10 years.

Rabbis’ lawyers blame woes on government mole Read More »

Focus turns to ways norms may reinforce improper conduct

An unwritten commandment permeates many parts of American-Jewish society: “It shouldn’t be a shande for the goyim.”

That fear—that the bad acts of a few Jews may bring great shame to their people’s reputation in the eyes of the broader gentile world—is embedded in fears and realities of persecution that have lingered for centuries.

Since the July 23 arrests of 14 Orthodox Jews on money-laundering charges, and a 15th accused of illegally buying and selling kidneys, the word shande—Yiddish for “shame”—has echoed in countless Jewish conversations.

So, too, have fears of anti-Semitism, calls for serious introspection, concerns about media coverage and even some suggestions that the insularity of the Syrian Jewish community may have contributed to the alleged lawbreaking.

“It looks terrible to the outside world, but I am more concerned with the Jewish world,” said Mark Charendoff, president of the Jewish Funders Network. “My late father used to say, ‘The anti-Semites don’t need our help to be anti-Semitic.’ ”

Shortly after news of the arrests broke, Charendoff wrote an op-ed for The New York Jewish Week urging community leaders to examine whether “something” in the Orthodox world creates “fertile ground” for corruption.

“For me, as an Orthodox Jew, Orthodoxy is supposed to stand for something—a system that creates higher levels of moral conduct and better communities,” Charendoff said. “Here we are not just seeing Orthodox Jews, but some Orthodox Jewish leaders. That is extraordinarily disturbing.

“Whenever someone dons the mantle of leadership, it comes with enormous responsibility and influence. One can use that influence for good or for ill.”

In the wake of the arrests, some commentators are suggesting the tight bonds of religious observance can sometimes lead to an us-and-them view of the outside world.

In an interview with Time magazine, the American-born Israeli writer Yossi Klein Halevi spoke this week of a “kind of borderless community that in its best expressions maintains international charity efforts that are second to none. But the dark side of this is a mentality that often too easily slides into rationalizations for acts that cannot be rationalized, with the idea that the end justifies the means.”

Azriel Fellner, a Conservative rabbi who was raised in a Modern Orthodox home and educated at an Orthodox yeshiva, blames the “insularity” of groups like the 75,000-strong Syrian-Jewish community.

Such insularity “is part of the fundamental reason they think they can do things like that,” said Fellner, the former religious leader at Temple Beth Shalom in Livingston, N.J.

“They don’t think they can be judged by anybody else,” he said. “They also feel self-righteous about everything they do—that somehow they’ve got the key to true Jewish belief and true Jewish law and anyone who deviates from that—even other Orthodox groups—do not match up to who they are. They feel not only insular but also protected against other people’s judgments, and that is dangerous stuff.”

A spokesman for the fervently Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America says such analyses ignore the positive sides of tightly knit Orthodox communities.

“One of the premises of the haredi community is that it can be stronger and more effective by being insular and protecting our families and children from the influences of the outside world,” Rabbi Avi Shafran, Agudah’s director of public affairs, said in an e-mail interview. “There is something to be said for that, but on the other hand, the result of that is you are not challenged by outside thinking and the norms of the broader community.”

In recent weeks, Shafran says he has been pained by reports of haredim rioting in Jerusalem in protest of various rulings by Israel’s secular authorities, and now by accusations of wrongdoing by American rabbis.

“There is no question that the recent reports create a sense of shame in us all. But at the same time, we are enjoined by Jewish tradition to not assume guilt on the basis of accusations,” said Shafran, referring to the corruption probe.

The accusations against fellow religious Jews “reflect negatively on us as divine signals that something is in fact amiss in our lives,” he said. “When we all are living as we should be, we believe, such things cannot happen.”

Adrienne Asch, director of the Center for Ethics at Yeshiva University, said Jewish communities must confront an ethos that seeks to protect wrongdoers from outside scrutiny.

“It is time for Jews to face the fact that there are criminals among them, just as there are criminals everywhere else,” she said. “We should not be protecting criminals for fear of persecution. We should be speaking out for what is fair and just.”

At the same time, Jews must be confident enough to treat wrongdoing as the issue, as opposed to what the “outside world” thinks.

“Jews are powerful people,” Asch said. “We have got to stop acting as if every terrible thing someone does is a public relations nightmare for Jews, as if we are all about to be persecuted if one person does a bad thing.”

But the potential for persecution is on the mind of Etzion Neuer, director of the Anti-Defamation League’s New Jersey region.

“It is predictable that anti-Semites will come out on the Internet. This case was no exception,” he said. “Unfortunately, issues such as this are fodder for professional anti-Semites.”

While the Jewish community is “not immune” from criminal behavior, Neuer said, he found especially troubling “the visual of a haredi man with long beard and a black yarmulke in handcuffs under arrest. It will be salacious for many anti-Semites, and we have to be vigilant about the way the media convey this message.”

Shafran viewed the media coverage through a different lens.

“The fact that among the arrested in such a major operation were not only visibly Jewish Jews but rabbis was not one any of us could reasonably expect the media to ignore,” he wrote in the e-mail. “It does us no benefit to blame the media here.”

Of special concern to Asch, a bioethicist, were the charges against Levy Izhak Rosenbaum, who is accused of buying kidneys from poor people for $10,000 apiece, then reselling them to the desperately ill for as much as $160,000.

“What he is charged with is trying to buy and sell organs with desperate people,” Asch said. “The important word is ‘desperate.’ Why should people make money by losing parts of their bodies? They compromise their health.

“Why are people buying organs? Because there is not an adequate supply,” she said. “It is very disturbing.”

Focus turns to ways norms may reinforce improper conduct Read More »