|
|

Advertisement
February 22, 2012 | 11:53 am
Posted by Jonathan Kirsch
| Tweet |

Prof. Timothy Snyder
The study of history may strike some readers as a sedate subject. Now and then, however, an historian comes along who can really shake things up. Timothy Snyder is one such scholar, and I am excited to announce that we will all be afforded an opportunity to meet Snyder in person when he appears as part of the ALOUD series at the Los Angeles Central Library on Tuesday, March 6, 2012, at 7:00 p.m.
Snyder, a professor of history at Yale University, boldly reframed the conventional narrative of the Second World War and the Holocaust in “Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin,” a landmark book that reminds us of the crucial but often overlooked role of Poland and Eastern Europe in that tragic era. When I reviewed “Bloodlands” in The Jewish Journal, Snyder’s provocative take on the Holocaust sparked a lively debate among our readers.
Snyder’s latest work is “Thinking the Twentieth Century” (Penguin, $35), but his role in the book is a bit unusual. The primary author is the late historian Tony Judt, an influential mover and shaker who did some impressive reframing of his own, and the byline is given as “Tony Judt with Timothy Snyder.”
But the byline conceals a poignant story. At 62, Judt was stricken with a degenerative neurological disorder while working on “Thinking the Twentieth Century,” and it was clear that he would be unable to complete the book. Snyder came to his rescue by recasting the book as a conversation between the two scholars — a conversation that amounts to an impressive intellectual achievement but also a touching encounter between two good friends at the end of one man’s life.
“I washed my hands in very hot water,” Snyder writes of their daily work sessions, which took place in Judt’s New York apartment during the final stage of his illness. “Tony suffered terribly from colds in his condition, and I wanted to be able to grasp his hand.”
What is preserved in the book that Judt and Snyder created together is a unique encounter between two lively and provocative minds, “a contemplation of the limitations (and capacity for renewal) of political ideas,” as Snyder puts it, “and of the moral failures (and duties) of intellectuals in politics.” Like the earlier work of both men, “Thinking the Twentieth Century” casts a new light on what we are tempted to regard as familiar terrain and allows us to see things that have been hidden from us until now.
Timothy Snyder will be featured in the ALOUD series at the Los Angeles Central Library, 630 W. Fifth Street, Los Angeles, CA 90071, at 7:00 p.m. on March 6, and it will be my honor and pleasure to serve as his interlocutor. Precisely because I have already read “Thinking the Twentieth Century,” I can promise that Snyder’s remarks will be spirited and perhaps a bit unsettling.
I am proud that the two of us will share a stage, but thanks to Snyder’s extraordinary friendship and colleagueship with Tony Judt, his late co-author will be there in spirit, too.
For more information and reservations about the event, visit the website of the Library Foundation of Los Angeles.
Jonathan Kirsch, author and publishing attorney, is the book editor of The Jewish Journal. He can be reached at books@jewishjournal.com.

4.7.12 at 10:29 am | Of Peter Beinart’s much-attacked book, “The. . .

4.1.12 at 8:14 am | For fans of Dora Levy Mossanen, author of the. . .

3.14.12 at 9:18 am | The Encyclopedia Britannica is going out of print. . .

3.2.12 at 5:44 pm | Leon Uris may have been best known as a novelist. . .

2.23.12 at 1:02 pm | Tragically, we are still obliged to keep the. . .

2.22.12 at 11:53 am | Now and then, an historian comes along who can. . .

11.29.11 at 5:44 pm | Even a futurist as famous and accomplished as Ray. . . (94)

11.2.09 at 12:56 pm | History and fantasy are the stock-in-trade of. . . (52)

11.25.09 at 6:12 pm | My very first experiment in the deconstruction. . . (26)






We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
July 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
| |||||||||
There is a profound ideological issue avoided by the analysts from the left who decry the abandonment of “democratic values” (and democracy itself) evidenced by the presence of settlers in the area known as the West Bank. Do you not see that there is an element of choice expressed by those very Palestinians who are the alleged victims of the imputed “non-democratic” structure of the Israeli government. You make the assumption that the principle of democracy in a sovereign state has been supposedly contaminated by these settlers who are being treated as bona fide full beneficiary citizens of their country while Palestinians (that is, non-Israelis) falling inside the same borders are not so considered. The choice of course is that of the Palestinian leadership to position their own people as in permanent conflict with the so-called occupying power, ipso facto, not eligible for being defined within the purview of Israel and therefore victims of its “apartheid” or even “fascistic” value system, to argue your position ad absurdum. Cannot you political thinkers on the left understand that the criteria of democracy for a beleagured Israel may be (and must be)different than the standards of democracy enjoyed by pluralistic countries not surrounded by those who want it destroyed. A democracy that embraces its dissident enemies from withn cannot stand long enough to remain democratic. When Palestinians and their sponsoring Moslem friends accept the reality of a Jewish State in their region, peace can then negotiated so that those within and outside its borders may embrace each other either in separate two states, one Moslem the other Jewish, or even under a federalist concept of governemnt under Israel. Until then, to assume that Israel’s criteria of democracy must be the same as those “theorists” who live without fear in New York, Paris, or London is to dream on in a world which will never achieve its utopian goals. Jonathan, sadly, your embrace of Beinart’s suppositions is just a lot of poltical moralistic fluff.
Irving S. White, PhD