| |||||||||
December 22, 2008 | 3:17 pm
Posted by Tom Teicholz
Is it my imagination or has David Geffen been extremely silent as of late?
No mention of Geffen in any of the Save MOCA Discussion, despite one of the MOCA outposts being called The Geffen Contemporary.
No mention of Geffen in the LA Times imploding. Remember when he wanted to buy the paper?
No mention of Geffen in the Madoff fraud — Spielberg, yes; Katzenberg, yes; but no Geffen.
And no mention of Geffen in all the Dreamworks financing issues. Spielberg is going into his own pocket to buy out the slate from Paramount, and keep the company afloat until the bridge loans kick in. But no Geffen.
Strange, no?
For more of the Tommywood blog, click here
4.14.09 at 12:28 pm | Appeals court issues stay of Demjanjuk’s . . .
4.14.09 at 11:50 am | Demjanjuk taken from home by US agents to be . . .
3.6.09 at 11:28 am | Novelist and essayist Thane Rosenbaum’s had . . .
3.4.09 at 11:56 am | Tommorrow night (Thursday March 5), novelist, . . .
2.19.09 at 11:09 am | Controversy surrounds Caryl Churchill’s . . .
1.20.09 at 3:37 pm | . . .
4.14.09 at 12:28 pm | Appeals court issues stay of Demjanjuk’s . . . (16)
3.6.09 at 11:28 am | Novelist and essayist Thane Rosenbaum’s had . . . (14)
1.6.09 at 11:40 am | Books I actually read for pleasure rather than . . . (11)
We welcome your feedback.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
Advertisement
Not your imagination. I was just thinking about this over the weekend.