October 27, 2009 | 9:12 pm

A Time For Action

Posted by Sam Yebri

By: Ramin Rabieian

Last week, I attended a press conference at Beverly Hills City Hall, organized by Assemblymembers Mike Feuer and Bob Blumenfield.  They announced that they will introduce legislation prohibiting contracts between the State of California and companies with significant business in Iran’s energy sector.  Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons is extremely alarming to me and to most in my community, if not all.  To feel and realize the danger of a nuclear Iran, one should view Iran’s nuclear ambitions not as a desire to build nuclear plants but as a possible plot to reconstruct Auschwitz and Birkenau. 
Even though the importance and urgency of the situation outweighs anything else, a sense of pride and muted joy overtook me.  I was proud because among the three people who addressed the crowd about the legislation was my colleague, Sam Yebri, President of 30 Years After. Seeing Sam speak signaled a point that our activist efforts to bring attention to Iran’s dangerous ambitions during the past months were beginning to bear fruit.  A feeling of muted joy was unavoidable because, after all, despite the promise of this legislation to help keep the world safe, we are forced to tackle an evil originating from the land where I was born, where my ancestors lived for centuries, and from where our community derives so much of our culture and heritage.

The buzz surrounding the press conference surpassed the dozens in attendance as people asked me how it went or forwarded emails about it.  The most important thing is that my generation, the generation of 30 Years After, feels the urgency of the situation and is showing an interest and willingness to fight this fight.  After all, our confidence in the dangers of the situation do not derive solely from news reports, but also from the firsthand knowledge of our parents’ interactions with the Islamic Republic of Iran, which ultimately led to their exodus to America and abandonment of two thousand years of Jewish life in Iran.

The Middle East is very volatile— wars in Israel, the sporadic yet very real flirtation with revolution in Iran and bombings in Iraq.  It is the uncertainty in this region that can make things go from bad to worse in an instant and endanger thousands of lives.  But in the case of a nuclear Iran, it is no longer thousands but possibly millions of lives.  This is why both our Jewish values and basic human decency mandate that we challenge Iran’s nuclear ambitions with the same boldness and resolve that previous generations fought for civil rights in America.

In the coming months, 30 Years After will strive to lead and channel the community’s aspirations for involvement, by hosting events such as the one featuring former CIA Director James Woolsey at the Museum of Tolerance with United Against Nuclear Iran, by engaging community organizations and leaders regarding Iran, and heightening community awareness and activism at a diverse group of synagogues. The future success of our efforts is in the hands of our community, whose support we desperately need. 

RAMIN RABIEIAN IS A RECENT GRADUATE FROM CAL STATE NORTHRIDGE WITH A DEGREE IN FINANCE.  HE CURRENTLY MANAGES REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES AND INTENDS TO COMMENCE LAW SCHOOL NEXT FALL.

September 10, 2009 | 7:29 pm

LIVE BROADCAST: The Health care Debate

Posted by Jay Firestone

This is a recording of a live broadcast from Sunday, Sept. 13, 2009

“Health Care Reform: What it would mean to your practice, to our community and to Los Angeles.”

Find more videos like this on EveryJew.com

Find more videos like this on EveryJew.com

Find more videos like this on EveryJew.com

Find more videos like this on EveryJew.com

Find more videos like this on EveryJew.com

Find more videos like this on EveryJew.com

Find more videos like this on EveryJew.com

Speakers include:

Hon. William W. Brien, M.D.
Member of the Beverly Hills City Council
Chief of Staff, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
CA State Health Policy Commissioner

Howard A. Kahn
CEO, L.A. Care Health Plan
Chair, CA Association of Health Plans
Commissioner, Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability (Prop 63) Commission
Co-Convener, Children’s Health Initiative of Greater Los Angeles

Sarita A. Mohanty, M.D.
Assistant Professor, USC Keck School of Medicine
Los Angeles County Public Health Commissioner
Medical Director, COPE Health Solutions

Larry Greenfield
Fellow in American Studies at the Claremont Institute
Executive Director of the Reagan Legacy Foundation.

7 Comments — Leave your comment

September 1, 2009 | 3:08 am

The Role of Technology in Diplomacy

Posted by Sam Yebri

The Role of Technology in Diplomacy
Nicole Farnoush

Social networking sites like Facebook and the now popular Twitter have hurriedly and indispensably integrated themselves into the daily lives of millions of users.  Not only do these sites connect peers socially, they have emerged as a global stage of what some might call gruesomely beautiful togetherness.  Case in point: The Iranian Elections.

The Iranian government cracked down on communication on the infamous Election Day.  The regime shut down email and text messaging services, depriving opposition leaders and peaceful protestors of their most effective organizing tools. 

When Iranian authorities clamped down on conventional communication and banned Western journalists from covering political demonstrations, sites such as Facebook and Twitter were able to provide media outlets critical information.  Resourceful social networking users found ways to evade government snooping by programming their Web browsers to contact a proxy—an Internet server that transmitted their connection through another country.  More importantly, these sites afforded individuals a firsthand glimpse into what was transpiring in Iran from the most credible source of all: its people.  Links to reports and photos from marches throughout Tehran, both peaceful and gruesome, spread virally into the homes of millions.  Activists, students, teenagers—people from all walks of life—shared their disgust for the footage that appeared on their computer screens.  Thousands of individuals changed the color of their avatars to green to signify their support for freedom in Iran.  Commentators even labeled such spontaneous anti-government demonstrations as the “Twitter Revolution.”

While the White House took a careful, hands-off approach, the U.S. State Department ensured that sites like Twitter stayed up and running for Iranians to use them.  The rationale behind this was simple.  This was about the Iranian people and giving their voices a chance to be heard. 

In fact, social networking sites provided information that was so vital to cover the rapidly developing events in Iran that conventional media such as CNN not only relied on Twitter and Facebook posts but actually based their television news coverage on them. 

Media coverage of events in Iran has recently died down.  However, it is essential to recognize the empowerment of cyber activism for people living under undemocratic governments. 

The beauty behind these social networking sites was and still is their resilience against censorship.  Where the Internet was banned, other means to communicate emerged.  With the overabundance of outlets to which these posts may appear, censorship seems almost impossible. 

Twitter “tweets” and Facebook updates from Iran have echoed throughout the world.  Where government officials closed one door, the youth opened another.  THIS is what makes social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter so powerful and why they became so crucial after the elections.  The revolution may not be televised.  But with enough bandwidth, it can be followed on Twitter. 

Nicole Farnoush serves on the Board of Directors of 30 Years After.  She earned her Master’s Degree in City Planning and Economic Development and a Bachelor of Science in Policy, Planning and Development from USC.

8 Comments — Leave your comment

July 20, 2009 | 2:59 am

Looking Back and Looking Forward

Posted by Sam Yebri

by Michael Yadegaran

The events of the past month should be a source of great pride for all Iranian Jews.  Following the elections of June 12th, we have witnessed pro-reform protests the likes of which we have not seen since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.  The popular uprising follows a heavily scrutinized election that most Western countries believe was illegitimate.  What began as anger over the Islamic Republic’s failure to declare Mir-Hossein Mousavi the victor quickly turned into protests in favor of overthrowing the Islamic Republic and its clerical hierarchy.

Multiple elements of this uprising distinguish it from any previous student demonstration or popular uprising since the Islamic Revolution.  Protesters were stunned by the death of “Neda,” a peaceful Iranian female activist who was brutally gunned down by Iran’s ruthless Basij secret police.  Neda’s death serves as a symbolic rallying cry on two fronts: she was both a woman and part of Iran’s large population of pro-reform youth.  Besides Neda, we see countless protesters willing to give their lives for a free Iran.  The majority of protesters are in their twenties, and have had enough of the oppressive policies of the Islamic dictatorship that has controlled their entire lives.

For any staunch supporter of Israel, Iran is the single greatest threat to Israel’s existence in recent history.  One month ago I returned from a mission to Israel with 22 young Iranian Jewish leaders from 30 Years After.  In our meetings with high-ranking Israeli officials such as MK and former Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz, Former Mossad Director Efraim Halevy, and MK Yoel Hasson, we witnessed a deep concern of a nuclear Iran. 

When protests broke out after the June 12th elections, I felt a need to show my solidarity with the Iranian protestors.  I looked for a pro-active way to support the uprising, and found myself marching in front of the Federal Building in Los Angeles multiple times over the past month.  However, rallies only go so far.  It is time for our policymakers to meaningfully challenge a regime that supports terrorism, brutally oppresses peaceful protesters, and advocates genocide.  The global community has given the Iranian uprising a resounding vote of confidence; it is time for our leaders to do the same.

One important tangible step that our local leaders can take in isolating the regime is by economic divestment.  To disincentivize corporations from doing business with Iran, it is vital that we demand divestment of our tax dollars from corporations that continue to inject capital into Iran’s economy.  Such isolation will not only paralyze the Iranian economy, but it will also prevent the Iranian regime from obtaining the technology it uses to crush and censor dissent. 

This Tuesday, July 21st, the Los Angeles Country Board of Supervisors will consider a resolution proposed by Michael Antonovich and Zev Yaroslavsky encouraging the County Pension Board to divest from companies doing business in Iran’s energy sector.  Divestment from the LA County Pension Fund - one of the largest public Pension Funds in the Country - will send a powerful message to Iran and to all companies that do business with the rogue regime.  30 Years After encourages its members to join in the audience to show support for this significant initiative and demand that Los Angeles not invest our tax dollars in supporting the Iranian government. 

The hearing will take place on Tuesday, July 21st at 9:30 am, Board Hearing Room 381B, Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration, 500 West Temple Street, Los Angeles 90012.

In addition, in 2008, the German corporation Siemens sold technology to Iran that the Islamic Regime used to intercept and catalog e-mails, telephone calls and Internet data. This technology was utilized in the brutal crackdown on post-election demonstrations.  On July 23rd, the Los Angeles MTA Board will vote on whether to open the bidding to Siemens on a $300 million contract to make rail cars for the Los Angeles subway.  Please contact each of the MTA Board members below and demand that our tax dollars not support corporations that are directly facilitating censorship and oppression in Iran:

o Ara Najarian
Chair
Mayor, City of Glendale
500 N. Central Ave., #940
Glendale CA 91203
ajn51esq@yahoo.com

o Don Knabe
First Vice Chair
Los Angeles County Supervisor
500 West Temple Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
(213) 974-4444
(213) 626-6941 fax
dsommers@lacbos.org

o Antonio R. Villaraigosa
Second Vice Chair, LACMTA
Mayor, City of Los Angeles
200 North Spring Street, Room 303
Los Angeles, CA 90012
(213) 978-0600
(213) 978-0750 fax
mayor@lacity.org

o Michael D. Antonovich
Los Angeles County Supervisor
500 West Temple Street, Room 869
Los Angeles, CA 90012
(213) 974-5555
(213) 974-1010 fax

o Diane DuBois
City Council Member, Lakewood
5050 Clark Avenue
Lakewood, CA 90712
Phone: 562-866-9771
Fax: 562-866-0505

o John Fasana
City Council Member, Duarte
1600 Huntington Drive
Duarte, CA 91010
Phone: 626-357-7931
FAX: 626-358-0018 CM
fasanaj@accessduarte.com

o José Huizar
City Council Member, Los Angeles
200 N. Spring Street, Room 465
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Phone: (213) 473-7014
Fax: (213) 847-0680
Ana.Cubas@lacity.org

o Richard Katz
City of Los Angeles
Mayor Appointee

o Gloria Molina
Los Angeles County Supervisor
500 West Temple Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Phone: (213) 974-4111
Fax: (213) 613-1739
molina@bos.lacounty.gov

o Pam O’Connor
City Council Member, Santa Monica
1685 Main Street, Room 209
Santa Monica, CA 90401
(310)458-8201
(310)458-1621 fax                    
pam.oconnor@smgov.net

o Mark Ridley-Thomas
Los Angeles County Supervisor
500 W. Temple Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
(213) 974-2222
(213) 680-3283 fax
markridley-thomas@bos.lacounty.gov

o Rita Robinson
City of Los Angeles
Mayor Appointtee

o Zev Yaroslavsky
Los Angeles County Supervisor
500 West Temple Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
(213) 974-3333
(213) 625-7360 fax
zev@bos.lacounty.gov

It is time to stand together against this regime; 30 years of oppression is enough.  As our brothers and sisters in Iran have been chanting—“Azadi! Azadi!” (Freedom! Freedom!)

—Michael Yadegaran is a History student at the University of California, San Diego and a member of the Board of Directors of 30 Years After. 

To learn more about Siemens’s ties to Iran and the upcoming MTA Board hearing, see: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jul/17/siemens-risks-losses-due-to-iran-ties/?feat=home_cube_position1 and http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124562668777335653.html.

1 Comments — Leave your comment

June 14, 2009 | 9:15 pm

Memories from Iran: 30 Years After

Posted by Sam Yebri

The scenes coming out of the streets of Tehran in the aftermath of Friday’s Iranian elections remind many Iranian Jews now living in Los Angeles of their last memories before they fled their native land: students taking to the streets, protesting the current regime and seeking to bring about a change.  But that is where the similarities end.  Today’s students are seeking that the democratic will of the people be respected, no longer seeking to force their will upon the people.  Chants of “Death to America” and “Death to Israel” have been replaced for a moment by “reformist” candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi’s supporters’ chants of “We Want Freedom” and “We Want Our Votes Back.”

Having now lived in history’s greatest experiment with democracy for 30 years, Iranian Jews living in Los Angeles support the Iranian people’s struggle towards a true and transparent democracy.  Recent developments in Iran, however, have called into question the truth and transparency of this most recent election.  With a government clampdown on the Internet, media and cell phone communications, and their ongoing refusal to permit international observers, the recent election results will be difficult, if not impossible, to verify.  Although a Mousavi victory is unlikely to bring about any immediate and significant policy changes in Iran with respect to their pursuit of nuclear weapons or their stance towards Israel and the United States, such a victory may encourage a new attitude amongst Iranian youth and to challenge their government to become a responsible member of the international community.

At the very least these recent elections have served to further expose the true face of the Iranian regime.  Even for those who have served as regime sympathizers and apologists, such as Roger Cohen of the New York Times, duplicitous election results and scenes of students being beaten simply for wanting their votes to be counted should leave no room for sympathy and apologies on behalf of the Iranian regime.  In his most recent op-ed published on June 14th, Roger Cohen states, “I erred in underestimating the brutality and cynicism of a regime that understands the uses of ruthlessness.”  Although such an observation is crystal clear to those Iranian Jews living in Los Angeles, it is now becoming clear to those like Roger Cohen who had been duped by the Iranian regime like many of Iran’s own citizens.

Although Iranian Jews living in Los Angeles are under no illusions that the chants of “Death to America” and “Death to Israel” will come to an end with a Mousavi victory, there is a belief that a free and fair election will bring the voices of more moderate elements of Iranian society to the forefront.  With that will come hope that these deafening chants may slowly fade into the past.

And as for young Persian Jews in Los Angeles, they are speaking out in force . . . on Facebook.  Select status updates from the last 48 hours include: 

thinking about putting the bar exam on hold to lead revolution in iran—- eat it mahmoud!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is a little graphic. Not for the faint of heart. Is this freedom? To get BEATEN for protesting?!
If by robust you mean fraudulent.. then yes good job prez
  by re-electing ahmadinejad, iran is committing suicide. no one, not even the mullahs are stupid enough to believe israel is gonna stand by and let iran wipe her off the map.
is proud of Iranians for not taking this injustice lying down
democracy?  hitler was elected democratically. so was hamas in gaza. and now ahmadinejad? why do our presidents wish to spread democracy so badly? bush and obama have it all wrong.
Doesn’t look like a landslide victory to me…
Ahmadinejad and his regime calling in every chance they have to destroy the Israeli state with all jewish people inside, we cant let it happen again
Get up, stand up: stand up for your rights!
Is glued to satellite tv watching protests and listening to eye witness reports from Tehran….
“Rivals in Iran Both Claim Election Victory”—I know this is a sensitive topic, but LOL!

Finally, for a critical briefing on the Iranian election and Iran’s nuclear program, please join 30 Years After Thursday June 18th at the Simon Wiesenthal Center as we host former CIA Director James Woolsey (http://www.30yearsafter.org/pdf/iran-nuclear-bomb.pdf).

Raymond Zolekhian and Sam Yebri are co-founders of the Iranian-Jewish civic action organization “30 Years After” (www.30yearsafter.org).  Zolekhian, a graduate of UCLA and Harvard Law School, and Yebri, a graduate of Yale University and USC Law School, are attorneys in Los Angeles.

2 Comments — Leave your comment

April 16, 2009 | 11:02 pm

That’s Where The Debate Is Going

Posted by Sam Yebri

Last week, we and three senior officials of the Jewish Federation met with a senior editor of The Los Angeles Times editorial page.  We arranged the meeting to express widespread criticism among members of the Los Angeles Jewish community of editorial decisions by the Times regarding Israel.  Specifically, we focused on the newspaper’s decision to publish an opinion piece by Hamas political deputy Mousa Abu Marzook on January 6, 2009, during the peak of the Hamas War.

In his piece, Marzook dismissed Israel’s response to Hamas’ indiscriminate rocket fire as a “preemptive strike” and “simpl[e] aggression . . . designed to sow terror and loose anarchy.”  In his sole reference to rocket fire from Gaza, Marzook claimed that only one Israeli had been killed in the six-months prior to the conflict.  The Times ran, then later corrected this outright lie.  Marzook also slammed calls for Hamas to recognize the right of Israel to exist as “hollow,” given Israel’s “murderous onslaught” and “military occup[ation].”

We asserted that publishing such a piece in the Times lends credibility to the views and actions of Hamas.  The editor, however, pointed to the democratic election of Hamas in Gaza and the favorable views of some world leaders towards Hamas, including President Jimmy Carter.  We understand the journalistic obligation to publish a broad spectrum of viewpoints and to let the marketplace of ideas rebut those views that some find pernicious.  But, our freedom of speech and freedom of press must be used responsibly.  This is especially true given that Hamas’ ultimate aim is the murder of Jews and the destruction of Israel.  Disseminating the views of a senior Hamas leader in a mainstream newspaper furthers those objectives.

Our conversation returned often to the larger issue of context.  We debated whether the average reader is aware of the founding Charter of Hamas or of Marzook’s terrorist history.  The Hamas Charter calls for the “obliteration” of Israel and its replacement with an Islamic state and quotes from the infamous Protocols of the Elders of Zion.  Marzook, meanwhile, is no political official, but a man the United States government indicted as conspiring to fund terrorism and listed as a “Specially Designated Global Terrorist.”  The editor noted that the Israeli media prints much more controversial pieces.  That argument is, of course, a straw man.  Every Israeli reader is aware that Hamas is committed to the death of innocent Jews; Israelis live daily in the shadow of Hamas’ terror.  Not all American readers are similarly aware of Hamas’ genocidal goals.  Publishing a piece by Marzook with a byline that fails to mention his admitted aim of killing Jews is akin to publishing a piece by former senatorial candidate and former KKK “Grand Wizard” David Duke with a byline that identifies Duke solely as a “political candidate.”  Doing so is misleading and dangerous.

The editor, a thoughtful journalist who to his credit welcomed our meeting, assured us that neither he nor his editorial board treats the decision to publish pieces by Hamas lightly.  We discussed the decision by The Washington Post to run an editorial critical of Hamas alongside an opinion piece by Hamas foreign minister and founder, Mahmoud al-Zahar.  Whether The Post’s decision was designed to avoid meetings like ours or reflected the newspaper’s desire to make a bold statement about the terrorist organization, it seems unlikely that Hamas would submit any pieces to The Post in the future.

Recently, The Los Angeles Times ran a pair of dueling opinion pieces: “Zionism is the Problem” by Ben Ehrenreich and “Is Anti-Zionism Hate?” by Judea Pearl.  We maintained that the editorial decisions of The Times frame debates on important issues—as evidenced by the Ehrenreich and Pearl pieces—and shape how policymakers view those issues.  The editor responded that while newspapers may to some extent frame debates, they also follow debates.  He then made a startling observation—that whether Israel should continue to exist as a Jewish state or whether Hamas’ grievances are valid and justified . . . “that’s where the debate is going.”

If that is true, anyone who values Israel as a bastion of freedom and democracy and a historical homeland for the Jewish people should be concerned.  That after sixty years and countless wars and conflicts the very right of the Jewish people to peace and autonomy is being revisited reflects an incalculable failure:  the failure to stand up effectively to Israel’s critics.  Our failure to speak up in a united and consistent fashion enables former American Presidents to label Israel an apartheid state, American diplomats to blast the “dishonor” and “indecency” of the “Israel lobby” when they are passed over for government positions, and the President of the United Nations General Assembly to accuse Israel of “genocide” for defending its citizens from rocket fire.

If indeed newspapers like the Times follow the debate and that is where the debate is going, our community must speak up.  If you disagree with something that a newspaper publishes, write a letter to the editor (for the Times, email letters@latimes.com).  Submit opinion pieces.  Request meetings with newspaper editorial boards.  Our silence, especially after a piece like Marzook’s, is deafening.

We are in danger of losing the debate.  If we do, we have no one to blame but ourselves.

David Peyman and Sam Yebri are co-founders of the Iranian-Jewish civic action organization “30 Years After” (www.30yearsafter.org).  Peyman, a graduate of UCLA and Harvard Law School, and Yebri, a graduate of Yale University and USC Law School, are attorneys in Los Angeles.

0 Comments — Leave your comment

March 1, 2009 | 4:07 pm

test

Posted by Sam Yebri

This is the first post for 30 Years After.

1 Comments — Leave your comment