
Advertisement
March 20, 2012 | 2:14 pm
Posted by David A. Lehrer
Ten days ago Community Advocates wrote an op/ed in the Los Angeles Times decrying a recently passed statute that authorized the state to survey all judges and judicial applicants in California as to their sexual orientation. We commented that the law was “pernicious in its application and insidious in its potential impact.”
In today’s editorial the Times agreed,
State lawmakers may have had the best of intentions when they approved legislation last year to require that California judges be asked in an annual demographic survey about their sexual orientation. The goal was to assess diversity on the bench. Instead,
the Legislature has inappropriately and ineffectively intruded into the private lives of judges
(emphasis added).
A good portion of the judiciary seems to think so too. Answering all or any of the survey questions is optional, and 40% of those who responded opted not to answer the question about sexual orientation, according to the recently released survey, which also queried jurists about their race, ethnicity and gender. The Administrative Office of the Courts — the staff agency to the Judicial Council of California — is required by the law to collect the information on all judges and judicial officers in the state. The data are released in the aggregate, arranged by court systems, not by individual jurists; no one is identified. However, in some small jurisdictions, that anonymity may be meaningless. For example, in the Mariposa court, both judges who responded to the survey declined to say whether they are heterosexual, gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender. Overall, 672 judges and officers, from the Supreme Court to the trial courts, declined to answer. An additional 1,005 did answer the question. (Nineteen said they were lesbian, 17 said they were gay, and one answered transgender.)
...
This was an ill-conceived attempt at promoting diversity on the part of the Legislature (emphasis added).
Read the full story here.

5.16.13 at 3:52 pm | An issue that affects families every day, alters. . .

5.8.13 at 2:45 pm | Most Americans have learned to resist. . .

4.23.13 at 2:52 pm | We should recognize and praise the tolerance that. . .

4.12.13 at 3:16 pm | Interesting speakers across a wide array of. . .

4.10.13 at 11:15 am | Urging that gender criteria should be. . .

3.12.13 at 1:21 pm | By many measures, teenagers today are faring. . .

5.8.13 at 2:45 pm | Most Americans have learned to resist. . . (140)

5.16.13 at 3:52 pm | An issue that affects families every day, alters. . . (64)
7.29.09 at 7:24 pm | Young black men commit murder at ten times the. . . (24)



We welcome your feedback.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com reserves the right to use your comment in our weekly print publication.
los angeles bloghome food trucks food trucks la race aclu food truck citizenship doj cuneiform racial discrimination afhu school nutrition racism emily bazelon islam food los angeles glbt racist president school bully proposition 209 muslims in america lgbt implicit bias ron paul pelosi uc wall street journal nypd demographics unit obama getty villa demographic study greuel university of california immigration unmanned aircraft akkad racial american friends of the hebrew university
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
| |||||||||