The Memo

December 28, 2008 | 7:13 am

Both Pollard and Milken merit pardons

Posted by Dean Rotbart

Photo

A Jewish Journal reader, Daniel E. Goodman of Valley Village, contends in this week’s Letters to the Editor that the paper and I are shameful for writing about a presidential pardon for Michael R. Milken when Jonathan Pollard “is actually rotting away in jail and really does need our help.”

Goodman is correct that I used my opinion column in the current issue of The Journal to argue on behalf of Milken, without mentioning a word about Pollard.  He is wrong, however, on several important points.

“Pollard deserves a write-up for a presidential pardon more than Michael Milken ever will,” Goodman argues. 

But the two cases are linked and prioritizing one over the other misses their common, inextricable elements. 

Both Pollard’s conviction and Milken’s involve selective punishment; both call into question the very fairness and objectivity of the U.S. justice system; both are unprecedented in the severity of their prosecution and both involve men who one can fairly argue were singled out, at least in part, for being Jewish.

If President Bush can hand out only one pardon before he leaves office, then I agree with Goodman that Pollard’s need is more pressing than Milken’s, especially given that Pollard remains incarcerated in the most squalid conditions.

But Goodman should understand there is no need for the President to make a choice between two deserving applicants.  Both men deserve pardons and deserve them now.

For those who are genuinely curious, the main reason that I didn’t write a ‘Pardon Pollard’ column instead of my ‘Pardon Milken’ column is that I didn’t know what more I personally could say about the compelling case for Pollard that hasn’t already been eloquently expressed by so many others.  For a solid sampling, please visit www.jonathanpollard.org.  At least in the case of Milken, I have seen a positive side of him that few others have documented in the press.

My closest encounter with Pollard came in November 2006, when I had the opportunity to interview his wife, Esther, for a live Sunday night radio show I hosted on Los Angeles’ 870 KRLA called Israel This Week.  I was joined in that conversation by Dr. Donald Salem, a Los Angeles Zionist who has closely tracked the Pollard case from the very beginning.  Those of you who know Dr. Salem know him to be a walking encyclopedia on Israel and its enemies.

Although it has been more than two years, the show still serves as a good refresher on the Pollard case. You can hear the entire Israel This Week program by clicking on this link.

If Dr. Salem’s and my interview of Esther Pollard makes one core point, it is that justice for Jonathan goes well beyond justice for one man.  It goes to the heart of America’s relationship with Israel, a key strategic ally.  As Esther notes, anyone who cares deeply about Israel and its future must also become an active advocate for Pollard’s freedom.

To learn more about ways you can help free Pollard, please visit www.freepollardnow.com.

2 CommentsLeave your comment

COMMENTS

We welcome your feedback.

Privacy Policy

Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.

I will not comment on Israel or our special relationship with her. And, I do not know enough about the Milken case to express any thoughts. What does bother me is the behavior of my government; I do not like it. I do not like it a lot.

Call me old fashion, but I have no idea where lying, slime balls like Caspar Weinberger and his ilk come from. Nobody elected them.

I also have to ask myself why the Rosenbergs were the only spies ever executed in peacetime and why Pollard was the only spy ever sentenced to life for friendly espionage. The common denominator seems to be they were Jewish.

Comment by William Northrop on 12/29/08 at 9:52 am

On his last full day as President, Mr Bush stayed out of sight at the White House and placed a dozen telephone calls to current and former world leaders to thank them for working with him over the past eight years and for their hospitality when he visited.
The only world leader to comment on Mr Bush’s outreach, Mr Peres, praised Mr Bush’s support for Israel and the March 2003 invasion of Iraq, saying: ‘Had the world acted against Hitler the way you did against Saddam Hussein, the lives of millions would have been spared.’
Because of Peres’s role - as the Prime Mnister during most of the time that Pollard engaged in espionage, and as the Prime Minister who helped ensure that the US government could successfully prosecute Pollard - Peres had the moral obligation to do more than his predecessors to get Pollard out of prison. Peres’s high standing in the Western world gave him the unique ability to win the ear of an administration that had not shown any interest in softening its position as to Pollard. It is apparent that Peres was speechless regarding Pollard when Mr. Bush telephoned. The saddest part is that the Israeli public let him get away with it. On January 19, 2009, Jonathan Jay Pollard was not listed on President George W. Bush’s final list of Presidential Pardons.

Comment by beth on 1/20/09 at 2:47 am

Post a Comment

Name:  
Email:  
URL:  

Type the word you see below:

Comment:

About this Blog

Blog Home
About the Blogger(s)
Contact

RSS


Blog Archive