September 8, 2008 | 9:04 am

When I first saw the headline—Palin’s Pastor Urges Flock to Pray for the Press—I thought: Well, prayer is meant to comfort the afflicted and the press do exist to afflict the comfortable, but has Pastor Larry Kroon really had it so bad over the past week that he needs God to reign in an unnecessarily intrusive press. My answer, despite some of the harsh portraits painted of Kroon, would be no.
But then I read the AP’s short dispatch on Kroon’s sermon yesterday, and I realized what a gracious host he has been to the droves of reporters who have come through town looking for political and theological dirt on Sarah Palin and who even sit through his sermons and then report on the most mundane of messages. (Conversely, The New York Times had a wonderfully written profile yesterday of how Palin’s Christian beliefs affect her politics: “Her foundation and source of guidance is the Bible,” the Times reported, “and with it has come a conviction to be God’s servant.")
The more forgettable example of religion reporting, tied to the headline, is after the jump:
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in 0 Comments — Leave your comment
9.3.08 at 12:31 pm | A surprising marriage ... (3346)
Why does a Jew care so much about Communion wafers, or Christianity? The writer of this article is Jewish, and many Jews today are either aethist or Reform. Not that it matters, Judaism has no business deciding or even commenting on what is holy or fulfilling vis a vis Christian practise of ...
By EG on 2008 08 04
scobra Apparently the Liberty was betraying Israeli to movements to Israel’s enemies who far outnumbered and outgunned Israel in an existential war so that the issues of what President Johnson was for or against or if the Liberty was in or over a line is irrelevant. I asked, if Israel sent a ...
By Ben Plonie on 2008 08 28
You seem to be having trouble with one of your eyes . . . Visine - gets the red ...
By Ben Plonie on 2008 06 28
5.14.08 at 6:05 am | It’s a $7 billion-a-year-business, and a secular New York Jew takes us deep ...
8.30.07 at 9:34 pm | The Jewish community finally admits that awful deeds were done upon the ...
8.16.07 at 1:11 pm | Yes, people find my Jewish name and Christian beliefs confusing, which is why The Forward asked for an explanation. Here it ...
5.8.08 at 10:07 am | Kevin MacDonald’s books about Jews have been compared to ‘Mein ...
12.14.07 at 11:16 am | One on one with the man behind “The Amazing Adventures of Kavailer & Clay,” “Yiddish Policemen’s Union” and “Wonder ...
11.26.07 at 1:21 pm | A college football ref talks dirty to the other ...
academia america american jews anti-semitism atheism barack obama books capitalism catholicism christianity crime death entertainment europe evangelicals family god holidays holocaust iran iraq islam israel jesus jihad john mccain judaism los angeles media middle east personal politics president 08 president bush president 08 satire science sexuality sports the law
Advertisement
September 7, 2008 | 1:21 pm

Despite Craig X Rubin’s legal problems, it appears Temple 420, the church he created, where cannabis is a sacrament, is still trucking . Many people are skeptical of Rubin’s sincerity of belief. It’s just another loophole, the logic goes, for smoking pot under the auspice of legal protections. Though Rubin has had no legal protections here:
“I JUST WANT TO GET THIS JAIL OVER WITH AND MOVE ON WITH MY LIFE AND FAMILY...I AM NOT A CRIMINAL....” Rubin wrote me in an email this spring, the most recent time we’ve spoken. “I PUT MY FAITH IN THE BIBLE...I KNOW THAT EVEN IF I DIE IN PRISON THAT JESUS IS THE RESURECTION...I MAY BE JEWISH, BUT I KNOW WHAT WHO I AM...AND THAT IS A FOLLOWER OF CHRIST (THEY CAN’T KILL US)...I KNOW THIS TOO...CANNABIS IS THE TREE OF LIFE....SO, LOOK WHAT IS HAPPENING...MILLIONS IN JAIL, ON PROBATION AND ON PAROLE...THEY DON’T CALL IT A MARIJUANA CHARGE...THEY CALL IT A PROBATION VIOLATION, BUT THERE ARE LITERALLY MILLIONS OF POOR AND DISENFRANCHISED PEOPLE IN JAIL FOR NOTHING MORE THAN MARIJUANA....BILLIONS OF DOLLARS WASTED...THE STOCK MARKET FALLING...THE GOVERNMENT TAPPING PHONES...LOOKS LIKE GERMERY ALL OVER AGAIN...AT LEAST TO MY FRIENDS WHOSE CHILDREN ARE BEING SEIZED FOR THEIR FAITH THAT CANNABIS IS A HEALING PLANT”
I’m not sure where Rubin is at (I’ve sent an e-mail to find out) but it looks like the use of pot for religious ceremonies, and the punishment that comes with it, has spread.
Dan and Mary Quaintance, founders of the Church of Cognizance, last month pleaded guilty in an Arizona federal district court to two marijuana-related charges. They will now pursue an appeal of the court’s refusal to dismiss charges against them on free exercise grounds. The Arizona-based church which has “monasteries” in members’ homes around the country, has as its motto: “With good thoughts, good words and good deeds, we honor marijuana: as the teacher, the provider, the protector.”
The difference between the Quaintances and Rubin, whose middle name really is X, is that the Church of Cognizance appears to worship marijuana, the giver of life. Rubin, by contrast, preaches from the Bible and prays to God, though one that includes a very different Tree of Life than most any theologians would recognize.
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in 1 Comments — Leave your comment
September 5, 2008 | 9:51 pm

Congratulations, Luke Ford. You’ve matriculated from the cover of The Jewish Journal to the Style pages of The New York Times. Luke appears there tomorrow courtesy of my former colleague Amy Klein, who spent several years as the object of his affection.
Amy’s column is called ”My Very Own Cyberstalker,” and it’s really, really good. Luke definitely knows how to create interesting copy. A healthy portion, including Luke’s disappointment at being interviewed by me and not Amy, after the jump:
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in 1 Comments — Leave your comment
September 5, 2008 | 4:58 pm
Now that he’s not running for president, I like Mike Huckabee a lot more. The former Arkansas governor sat down with Christianity Today’s Sarah Pulliam at the RNC yesterday. Here’s a snippet:
How does Sarah Palin’s candidacy change the race?
I think it’s really energized the base of the party and given people a reason to be excited about the ticket. There was a lot of anxiety about McCain picking Lieberman. He really gave people a reason to be not just accepting about the ticket. Everyone I’ve talked to is excited about the ticket. It’s a completely different atmosphere than it was a week ago.Do you think Palin’s pregnant daughter will change whether people will vote for her?
The way the media went after the daughter is the most shameful thing I’ve ever seen in my life. If anything, it just caused [evangelicals] to run to her. Everyone understands that the basis of being a Christian is that everyone has fallen short of God’s ideal. Everyone understands that. We do understand is that when there’s a problem or failures, the family sticks together. We saw a mother who gave her unconditional love to her daughter. That embodies what Christianity means. We all mess up, the issue is how we respond to it. What she showed us is exactly what we wanted to see in terms of a witness.(skip)
Do you think the issues that evangelicals care about have changed?
I think one of the things that is positive is that while they are still steadfast on life and marriage, but there’s a broadening of the issues. People are care about hunger, poverty, and diseases. It’s one of the things I’m very, very thrilled to see. I’ve advocated for a long time education reform, health care reform, and conservation. Those are issues that touch everybody.
How has your faith affected your policies?
In two ways. I don’t have to wake up every morning and think what do I want to believe today. You sense that public policy ought to be a direct result of your deep convictions, not just trends that you can pick up on through polling. I believe in my heart of hearts that sanctity of every human life is important. I don’t support traditional marriage because polls show I should. It’s the foundation of our society. In that way, I think it’s a part of shaping your views and the priorities you have.
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in God for President | 4 Comments — Leave your comment
September 5, 2008 | 3:07 pm

“The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.”
That passage comes from the 41st book of the Hadith, which contains the oral traditions of the Muslim prophet Muhammad. It is a historic passage that has long been identified as an innate source of anti-Semitism in Islam. And last month the provost at the University of Southern California required the Muslim Student Union remove the passage from a compendium of Islamic texts on the USC server.
“The passage cited is truly despicable,” Provost C.L. Max Nikias wrote in a letter to USC trustee Alan Casden.
I wrote about the action last month. But it’s now gaining new life because the Muslim students allege the university, at the urging of members of the Jewish community, censored their religious texts without speaking with them.
“We are outraged at the censorship of a complete religious and classic text without consulting us or any religious authority first,” the group said in the statement. “The ‘compendium’ is now incomplete. There are verses in many religious texts (be it the Torah or the New Testament) that when taken out of context can be taken as offensive.”
Certainly there are violent and offensive passages in the Tanakh. I’m particularly a fan of how Simeon and Levin avenge the raping of their sister, Dinah. But I can think of none in the Christian New Testament. More importantly, though, was that this passage, vile regardless of its tradition, was hosted on a university Web site. If members of the Muslim Student Association were prevented from displaying this passage on a private Web site, that would be an entirely different case.
(Thanks for the link, Web Guy.)
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in 4 Comments — Leave your comment
September 5, 2008 | 12:58 pm
Sadly, some people cannot afford a $1,000 surgery to save their pet’s life. On the other side of the coin, a New York man threw a Schwartzmanesque party for his dog, Elvis. Believe it: David Best called the $10,000 soirée a “Bark Mitzvah.”
Such a ceremony, though hardly a spiritual rite of passage, is not entirely unusual. (Read more here.) But spending that kind of green for a doggy’s big day, well, that’s just ridiculous.
Thanks to the GeekHeeb for sending this report along.
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in 0 Comments — Leave your comment
September 5, 2008 | 11:07 am

Last night I mentioned how I heard John McCain name-drop the Lord’s name several times during his speech. Today, The New York Times ran a graphic that looked at the words the candidates used in their speeches.
“As it turns out, GOP speakers invoked the name of God ("God") nearly twice as often Democratic ones, 43 to 22,” Mark Silk writes at Spiritual Politics. “But when it came to the tickets themselves, the invocations were tied: Biden and McCain, 8 each; Obama and Palin, 2. In other words, those candidates most identified with religion mentioned God least.”
Hmmm. I wonder why? I think we can guess pretty accurately.
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in God for President | 0 Comments — Leave your comment
September 5, 2008 | 10:53 am

I saw this tweet from AudioJT yesterday and I thought it was pretty beautiful:
“Old Anglican prayer - Lord, what we know not...teach us. What we have not...give us. What we are not...make us, for your sake… Amen”
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in 0 Comments — Leave your comment
September 5, 2008 | 9:55 am
My primary criticism of Bill Maher’s “Religulous” was that it argued apples (religious people) were absolutely bananas (insane) by almost exclusively focusing on kumquats (the strangest fruits you’ll ever eat). To Jon Stewart’s credit, he skewers his victims not by often choosing the biggest target but by trapping the leaders of our world in their own words.
The above video was brought to you by my wife, the liberal lunatic in our divided house sound thinker who keeps this reluctant Republican balanced.
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in 2 Comments — Leave your comment
September 5, 2008 | 5:56 am

I’ve been trying to avoid blog posts about Sarah Palin, who has dominated the content here for almost a week now, but The Web Guy sent me this gem from Jonathan Martin’s blog at Politico that was too good to pass up. It’s a reader email that takes aim at Palin’s community-organizing comment:
“Mrs. Palin needs to be reminded that Jesus Christ was a community organizer and Pontius Pilate was a governor.”
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in 2 Comments — Leave your comment
September 4, 2008 | 10:12 pm

I’m not much for political speeches, and wasn’t so mesmerized by John McCain tonight. Green-screen malfunction aside, I enjoyed hearing McCain drop the biggest name that’s been mentioned throughout the presidential election season: God.
McCain has had an at-best-tenuousrelationship with evangelicals, a relationship that a certain someone has really buoyed. Here’s the prayer McCain’s pastor, Dan Yeary, offered at the Republican National Convention tonight:
Almighty God, we are grateful for the gift called America. We are thankful for the freedom to celebrate what we are doing and have done this week. We have repeatedly invoked your blessing on our country. And as we do, we are reminded of the words you gave to Solomon: if my people who are called by my name will humble themselves and pray, and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, you will hear from heaven and heal our land.
So we pray, humble us Lord, humble us as a people to serve you, help us to seek your face alone. Give us the courage to turn from our self-centered, wicked ways. Hear us, oh Lord, as we ask you to heal our land. We ask you to still the storms … tonight that we ask that you protect our young men and young women who are protecting us from terrorism.
Lord, we ask a very special blessing on our brother John McCain. (cheering)
Father, we think that he has been prepared for such a time as this. We ask that you give him wisdom and courage, wisdom that comes from you, and courage that comes from his relationship with you. We ask your blessing and divine protection on Cindy and the children. May they see such honor and integrity in their parents that they rise up and call them blessed.Oh Lord, in humility, we ask that you remind us that we cannot put our country first unless you are foremost. For as Jesus taught his disciplines, thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever. Amen.
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in 0 Comments — Leave your comment
September 4, 2008 | 3:22 pm
Video footage of Jordan Farmar’s trip to Israel, courtesy of the one and only Elie Seckbach.
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in 0 Comments — Leave your comment
September 4, 2008 | 9:58 am

Focus on the Family leader James Dobson said last night that he’s come around on John McCain. Why is that so surprising?
Well, beside that fact that McCain is incredibly uncomfortable in a room full of evangelical Christians, Dobson said in February that he wouldn’t vote for McCain ”as a matter of conscience.” In July he changed his tune to tepid optimism. And then last night, before McCain’s running mate, Sarah Palin, whose Christian convictions have endeared her to a lot of my friends—Rhett Smith tweeted last night, “Sarah Palin, you had me at hello.”—Dobson’s organization sent this around:
Dr. Dobson: ‘If I Went into the Polling Booth Today, I Would Pull the Lever for John McCain’ ...."A genuine reformer. A deeply committed Christian.”
That’s how Dr. James Dobson, founder and chairman of Focus on the Family Action, described Gov. Sarah Palin, who joined Sen. John McCain’s presidential ticket Friday.
On a special Focus Action radio broadcast, Dr. Dobson said Palin has helped change his mind on McCain.
“If I went into the polling booth today, I would pull the lever for John McCain,” he said.
Editor’s note: I’m totally burnt out by blogging ad nauseum about Sarah Palin. I don’t care if Barack Obama drops Joe Biden in favor of getting Palin on his ticket, I’m not mentioning her in another post until at least Sunday.
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in God for President | 2 Comments — Leave your comment
September 4, 2008 | 9:37 am

I mentioned to a friend the other day that I knew girls in high school who got pregnant and kept the child and that I also knew of people, from wealthier families, who got pregnant and had their problem “taken care of.” What has made Bristol Palin’s pregnancy so surprising to me—beside the way social conservatives have rallied around her decision to marry and become a mother—is that the Palins went public with their daughter’s mistake. Though the Palins belong to that class of Americans whom you expect to keep quiet their indiscretions, they also belong to that subset of evangelical Christians who, from the looks of things, practice what is preached.
With this in mind, I found an article by Slate’s mad biology reporter and resident fertility expert, William Saletan, both intuitive and affirming. After doing some devil’s arithmetic, Saletan concludes that at least a few of the presidential and vice presidential candidates’ daughters since 1964 must have gotten pregnant out of wedlock. Why didn’t we hear about these women? His suspicion would be my own:
An unintended pregnancy rate of 6 to 7 percent, in a population of 37 women, means two to three pregnancies per year. Even if you discount the rate further, on the grounds that these are the wealthiest and best-educated families, the notion that none of these young women got knocked up before their parents’ nominations or elections is—pardon the term—almost inconceivable. If you’re a politician, and your daughter gets pregnant out of wedlock, you can be systematically excluded from the sample of nominees by self-selection, voters, or running-mate vetters. But not if the pregnancy never becomes known.
If any of these daughters conceived, but no pregnancy or birth was reported, what happened? One possibility is miscarriage. But the Guttmacher analysis suggests a different answer: Most unintended pregnancies in the higher income and education brackets end in abortion.
Remember that before you judge or poke fun at Sarah Palin. She’s not the candidate whose daughter messed up. She’s the candidate who didn’t get rid of the mess.
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in 0 Comments — Leave your comment