|
|

Advertisement
September 16, 2007 | 12:30 pm
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg
| Tweet |
In this 20-minute Q & A with the Hoover Institution, atheist spokesperson and journalist Christopher Hitchens takes on “the appalling insinuation that I would not know right from wrong if I was not supernaturally guided.”
I can’t embed the video, but here is the link. Let me know what you think.
5.25.12 at 4:02 pm | Judge Wilken held that the Defense of Marriage. . .
5.24.12 at 9:49 pm | Though Maryland does not recognize same-sex. . .

5.24.12 at 2:43 pm | Maybe the most racist job posting you've ever. . .

5.23.12 at 7:19 pm | The former MLB star is pushing 40 but isn't done. . .
5.22.12 at 10:28 am | Christianity Today reports that .... . .
5.21.12 at 9:03 pm | Harold Camping had predicted that .... . .

11.26.11 at 12:14 pm | A new book of essays provides .... . . (1361)

5.24.12 at 2:43 pm | Maybe the most racist job posting you've ever. . . (222)

12.13.11 at 12:24 pm | What was really behind Matisyahu shaving his. . . (180)


We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
judaism christianity israel politics media islam los angeles barack obama entertainment anti-semitism america sports american jews evangelicals crime the law satire president 08 president 08 god personal john mccain holocaust sexuality war catholicism holidays jesus books europe atheism sarah palin academia science bible death middle east california music iran
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
God's Blog
God for President
Book Bits
Caption Contest
Jewish genius
Strange science
Who is a Jew?
World of Worship
Blogs
Bloggish-mobile
Foodaism-mobile
Hollywood Jew-mobile
Jews and Mormons-mobile
Keeping it Real-mobile
Keeping the Faith-mobile
Morethodoxy-mobile
Nice Jewish Doctor-mobile
Rosners Domain-mobile
Tattletales-mobile
The God Blog-mobile
The Ticket-moblie
Leisure-mobile
Multimedia-iPad
Photos-iPad
Videos-iPad
Passover Reader
| |||||||||
Smart discussion. It’s a shame that kind of stuff doesn’t seem to air on television.
I do take as simplistic some of the questions of the interviewer. The “If we’re all just atoms then whence morality” line is abhorantly facile.
The world is made up of structures on top of structures, and to boil things down to a baser structure is to conveniently discard the actual context that the question should address.
“But officer, if laws are just made up of letters on paper… you can’t give me a ticket!”
“But doctor, if cyanide is just protons, neutrons and electrons, just like pork chops, I can’t possibly be poisoned.”
“But mr loan officer, money is just ink and paper…. I’ll trade you a whole phonebook for some of your green!”
To boil it down to a lower structure in ANYTHING is to ignore, puposefully, the relevant rules, economy, culture, physics, biology, sociology, morality, social-norms, laws, and whatever else that actually exerts driving forces on the situation in question.
Whence MORALITY? Tell it to the judge “But your honor, I wasn’t stealing the movie. I just took some spare photons and turned them into electrons with my camcorder!”
It’s such a transparant DODGE that I don’t know how self-respecting intellectuals can peddle it. Such reasoning wouldn’t cut it in court, but aparantly it works just fine in theology.
and apparently I can’t spell apparently.
I always identified with C.S. Lewis’ argument that God must exist because how else could man feel an innate sense of right and wrong. I still believe that it is an imprint of God, but Anonymous makes a valid point. We can’t say: Yes, man recognizes the difference between good and evil, therefore God is real.
That may be the reality, but proving one doesn’t prove the other.
Hitchens is a smart man and an interesting voice in this arena. But, in general, I find to be too antagonistic toward religion, and too cynical because of the violence and hatred it inspires.