|
|

Advertisement
July 7, 2008 | 11:17 am
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg
| Tweet |
In light of the hype surrounding the unveiling of an ancient tablet that suggests some Jews were expecting the messiah to rise from the dead after three days, Mollie at GetReligion has some strong words for the media’s affinity for sensationalizing any report that will supposedly—supposedly—shake the bedrock of Christianity:
There is nothing the media like more than to sensationalize undeserving stories. Usually this involves either the disappearance of young, attractive white women or alleged revelations about Jesus. in the latter category, we’ve read that Jesus walked on an ice floe (not water), that he wasn’t crucified in the manner in which people think, that Jesus’ father was a Roman soldier named Pantera, not Joseph, and that Jesus didn’t die on the cross so much as pass out after being doped up.
Usually these stories “break” around major Christian holidays. Remember Easter 2006? When National Geographic argued that Judas was unfairly maligned by Christians? The story was covered far and wide by all the major media outlets. Two years later, the news that National Geographic rushed the story and engaged in shoddy scholastic work (daemon translated as “spirit,” etc.) was not covered in any way approaching the same degree.
The latest example shows the difficulty journalists have in resisting the shock angle on stories. A completely legitimate and interesting story gets turned into yet another thing that is supposed to shake the very foundations of Christianity. Come on! Enough already! Or can the media at least come up with a better spin, hoax or overblown discovery?
(skip)
Um, newsflash to the New York Times. Christians pretty much think the entire story of Jesus life, death and resurrection is part of a “recognized Jewish tradition” at the time. In other words, Christians read much of the Old Testament as prophesying about Jesus. They see Jesus as the fulfillment of those prophecies.
She makes some great points. Read the rest of her post here.
2.9.12 at 2:19 pm | A video that is sure to get some attention. . .
2.8.12 at 6:08 pm | Like many Californians, Seventh-day Adventists. . .
2.8.12 at 2:40 pm | Robin Tyler, a Jewish activist, and Diane Olson. . .
2.8.12 at 2:24 pm | Romney's faith is so interwoven with his identity. . .
2.7.12 at 9:15 pm | Mollie Ziegler Hemingway and Amy Sullivan debate. . .
2.7.12 at 4:46 pm | In affirming that the California voter-passed. . .
11.26.11 at 12:14 pm | A new book of essays provides .... . . (1015)
2.8.12 at 6:08 pm | Like many Californians, Seventh-day Adventists. . . (299)
2.8.12 at 2:40 pm | Robin Tyler, a Jewish activist, and Diane Olson. . . (212)

We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
judaism israel christianity politics media islam los angeles barack obama entertainment anti-semitism america sports american jews evangelicals crime the law president 08 satire president 08 god personal john mccain sexuality holocaust war holidays catholicism books europe jesus atheism sarah palin academia science bible middle east death california family music
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
God's Blog
God for President
Book Bits
Caption Contest
Jewish genius
Strange science
Who is a Jew?
World of Worship
Blogs
Bloggish-mobile
Foodaism-mobile
Hollywood Jew-mobile
Jews and Mormons-mobile
Keeping it Real-mobile
Keeping the Faith-mobile
Morethodoxy-mobile
Nice Jewish Doctor-mobile
Rosners Domain-mobile
Tattletales-mobile
The God Blog-mobile
The Ticket-moblie
Leisure-mobile
Multimedia-iPad
Photos-iPad
Videos-iPad
| |||||||||
Yes, she makes some great points. We in the Orthodox Jewish community face this kind of thing all the time - “Hey, didja hear about the Orthodox gay Rabbi?” “No, but there’s an Orthodox rabbi who proposes dividing Jerusalem” “How about the Orthodox rabbi who says there are many valid paths to God” “That’s nothing - I know an Orthodox guy who says God doesn’t care if you eat ham and eggs for breakfast dadadadada…”
Likewise, Ben Plonie posts on the God Blog here http://www.jewishjournal.com/thegodblog/item/was_jesus_resurrection_culturally_expected_20080706/#comments
“It doesn’t look to me like there is enough definite information to generate meaningful debate or hand-wringing.” etc. Good readin’.
True dat, BP.
And before I forget, thanks for the links to http://www.getreligion.org, never seen it before.
“Holy Hannukah! Orthodox Judaism seems a little underrepresented there, B-Man!” Hehehe…
Your article “The media and Jesus mythbusters” points to an article by Mollie at GetReligion, which says that the Gabriel stone shows the Messiah’s resurrection to be part of a “recognized Jewish tradition.”
If as she says, “there might be a reference to the “prince of princes” rising from the dead after three days” in the tablet, does it refer to part of the scriptures? How does Biblical scholar Israel Knohl conclude that since the tablet resembles Daniel in discussing Gabriel and a prince of princes, it therefore must be talking about a Messiah who dies and resurrects in three days? Does the book of Daniel lead him to that conclusion because Daniel 9 predicts the Messiah’s death? If so, then why does Knohl claim “a suffering messiah is very different from the traditional Jewish image of the messiah as a triumphal, powerful descendant of King David.”
Why does Molly say that prophecies in Isaiah and Psalms are about the Messiah, instead of God’s servant Israel, or David? Knohl says that Jesus’ “mission is that he has to be put to death by the Romans to suffer so his blood will be the sign for redemption to come… This is the sign of the son of Joseph.” How is martyrdom a sign of the son of Joseph, and is Knohl admitting that scriptures say that a Messianic “son of Joseph” would be killed?
How do we know that his mission “to shed blood is not for the sins of people but to bring redemption to Israel?”
It is interesting reading your articles on the GodBlog about the scriptures and the Messiah’s resurrection, Brad. After reading them and other articles, I have come to think that the scriptures predict that the Messiah would resurrect, and wrote about it on my blog rakovskii.livejournal.com
And, depending on your view of John 10:22, I would like to wish you a Happy Feast of the Dedication and a Happy Hanukkah, brother!
All the Best!