Quantcast

Advertisement

The God Blog

May 1, 2009 | 2:18 pm

StandWithUs gets signatures for UCSB prof investigation

Posted by Brad A. Greenberg

Within five minutes of publishing the previous post about the UC Santa Barbara professor under fire for his strong criticism of Israel, I received this e-mail from the pro-Israel campus organization StandWithUs:

The StandWithUs petition supporting the University of California- Santa Barbara (UCSB) investigation of a professor’s possible violations of faculty conduct codes has been overwhelmed with endorsers. Released on April 30 at 5:00 PST, the petition had over 1,500 signatures by 10:00 AM May 1.  StandWithUs expects thousands more signatures from around the world and will deliver t he petition to UCSB administration in May.

StandWithUs is an international Israel education organization.  The petitions, sample letters to UCSB administration and background information can be found at:  http://standwithus.com/rup/ucsb.asp?tab=5

“People are genuinely concerned because crucial principles are at stake. This case is a litmus test of whether professors can exploit their positions of authority to impose their political prejudices on students or whether the university truly will remain a place where all points of view can be comfortably and responsibly discussed.  That is the reason we support the administration and wrote this petition,” stressed Esther Renzer, international president of StandWithUs.

On January 19, Professor William I. Robinson used one of his class e-mail lists to send inflammatory comments, an article, and lurid photos that equated Israel and Nazi Germany. He admitted they were unrelated to the course. Two students dropped the class and filed grievances against Robinson for violating the Faculty Code of Conduct by intruding material unrelated to the course, exploiting his position of authority to foist one extreme point of view, and using a university class e-mail list for political purposes.

When UCSB administrators decided to formally investigate the violations, Robinson’s supporters launched a campaign to oppose it. They claim they are defending academic freedom, but they are undermining it, according to StandWithUs. The Faculty Code guidelines that Robinson may have violated are designed to uphold academic freedom.

Robinson’s supporters also claim that he is being accused of anti-Semitism merely because he criticized Israeli policies. “This is disingenuous,” stated Roberta P. Seid, PhD, StandWithUs education/research director. “Robinson’s e-mail demonized I srael, its founding, and its history. The university should be concerned about the degradation of academic standards when professors present such polemics as reasonable analyses. But that is not the case against him.  The case is that he inappropriately used university resources to impose and promote his personal political prejudices, stifling students’ ability to critically examine controversial issues.  I’m sure he would be glad that the Code of Conduct safeguards are in place if a homophobic or racist professor took the liberties he took to influence students.”

StandWithUs launched the petition also to protect the right of students to register grievances against faculty without fear of hostile faculty reactions. “Robinson’s supporters’ assault on the students’ complaints could disempower other students with grievances and intimidate them into silence,” said Roz Rothstein, StandWithUs international director.

“The politicization of academia is a serious problem today. We applaud the UCSB administration for trying to uphold standards of academic freedom and responsibility. They are under a lot of pressure, and our petition lets them know that tens of thousand of people support them and their commitment to ensure that the university remains what it should be—a place for the critical examination of ideas, facts, and values,” said Rothstein.

For more, check out the profile of StandWithUs that I wrote last year.

4 CommentsLeave your comment

COMMENTS

We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.

Privacy Policy

Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.

Terms of Service

JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.

The quality of discussion on this topic is high. I would just point out that academic freedom implies freedom of academic-quality material, that meets standards of an ethical approach to the truth. Robinson may be an ‘academic’, but his actions do not meet those standards; he does not have the freedom to disseminate lies. Your profile on Stand With Us was great and lays out the issues of intimidation and abuse in proper perspective; that is flowing from the professor to the students. In that article you also include a reference to http://www.columbiaunbecoming.com/ which had features of the same type of problem.

Comment by Ben Plonie on 5/03/09 at 1:07 am

To follow up on Ben’s comments, this is a relationship of power—the power (grades, recommendations) that a faculty member has over his/her students.  This can lead to intimidation of students in the face of inappropriate propagandizing by faculty. 

In addition, academic freedom does not give one the freedom to disseminate either hate speech or out-and-out lies.  Holocaust denial would not fall under the rubric of “academic freedom”.  And the grossly inappropriate comparison of, on the one hand, Israel’s defensive actions against an enemy that had lauched tens of thousands of rockets, and on the other, the industrial killing machine that was Nazi Germany, certainly doesn’t measure up to any reasonable standards of truthfulness.

Comment by DrMike on 5/03/09 at 10:58 pm

Excellent. The actual argument that Stand With Us and the David project makes is that suppression of academic freedom is a one-way street; the other way, from power down to the powerless students. Universities provide the academic freedom for the consumer public to benefit from, not to hand out condoms for entrenched radicals to practice ‘safe propaganda’.

Comment by Ben Plonie on 5/04/09 at 7:26 am

This is not a case of academic freedom or even an isolated incident of an overzealous liberal self-hating jew getting carried away with his power (which he clearly mis-used).  This is part of a concerted effort by the arabs/palestinians to use our own educational systems to win the minds of our children.  I have seen it in campuses across the US, and particularly on the UC campuses where the foreign students are funded by “saudi money” to terrorize and intimidate the jewish students on campus.  The Saudi money is used to fund Middle-eastern studies programs, and the “arab-friendly” professors are given “grant money”.  This is just another side of Jihad, and our liberal Ivory Tower teachers play right into their hand.  This is not a case of jewish students over-reacting—this is a case of students being so fed up with the continuous intimidation of anti-Isreal sentiment being fostered by the arab students and supported by the profs.  Guess who Robinson’s supporters are—Palistinian and Arab students.  What a surprise.

Comment by concerned parent on 5/06/09 at 11:11 pm

Post a Comment

Name:  
Email:  

Type the word you see below:

Comment:


About this Blog

Blog Home
About the Blogger(s)
Contact

RSS


Blog Archive






Newspaper

Serving a community of 600,000, The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles is the largest Jewish weekly outside New York City. Our award-winning paper reaches over 150,000 educated, involved and affluent readers each week. Subscribe here.

© Copyright 2012 Tribe Media Corp.
All rights reserved. JewishJournal.com is hosted by Nexcess.net. Homepage design by Koret Communications.
Widgets by Mijits. Site construction by Hop Studios.

counter fake hit page