| |||||||||
June 29, 2009 | 8:59 am
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg

“Ruth Madoff: Homeless and without a hairdresser as husband gets 150 years in jail.”
Poor Ruth.
Earlier this month, The New York Times wrote in a profile of Ruth Madoff that “she has become perhaps the most vilified spouse of a financial rogue in history.” The Times continued in “The Loneliest Woman in New York”:
life was also ruined. Although no evidence has emerged to date that she conspired or even knew about her husband’s crimes, her plight has evoked no apparent public sympathy. She has been pilloried and turned into a pariah.
The wives of other notorious criminals, like Ivan Boesky, Michael Milken and Nicholas Leeson, endured rough social sledding but eventually emerged with new careers and new friends. It’s not as if they couldn’t still go out and have their hair done. There wasn’t quite the same pack of gleeful tabloid photographers as there was, say, when Mrs. Madoff bought cheese in the supermarket a few months ago.
By contrast, the public reaction to Mrs. Madoff has been white hot and vitriolic. Rightly or wrongly, she is viewed as an unrepentant beneficiary of ill-gotten wealth, a petite and well-dressed embodiment of the collective, bloated greed that helped topple the stock market and the housing industry.
“She’s perceived as the succubus to Bernie’s incubus,” said Prof. Richard A. Shweder, a cultural anthropologist at the University of Chicago. “She was inside a circle of people whose wealth has been sucked out of the system.”
The evidence: Ruth Madoff’s high-brow hairdresser told her to get her highlights elsewhere. And now, according to the the New York Post, Madoff, who last week agreed with federal prosecutors to sell their Manhattan apartment, can’t find a room for rent. No landlords want her; even using her maiden name isn’t helping.
“She has nowhere to go,” a broker told the Post. “No one wants someone with her name in their building. People like their privacy.”
11.5.09 at 4:42 pm | Concerns rise for Muslim Americans who . . .
11.5.09 at 8:35 am | In an episode about obnoxious Harley riders . . .
11.4.09 at 5:40 pm | The law school kick-offs a year analyzing . . .
11.4.09 at 1:32 pm | As if this saga couldn’t get any worse . . .
11.4.09 at 5:38 am | The director of a Texas office of Planned . . .
11.4.09 at 12:21 am | At the polls Tuesday, Maine voters repealed the . . .
11.4.09 at 1:32 pm | As if this saga couldn’t get any worse . . . (1810)
10.15.07 at 7:01 am | . . . (792)
12.24.07 at 3:25 pm | . . . (779)
We welcome your feedback.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
judaism israel christianity politics media los angeles barack obama islam anti-semitism entertainment america american jews sports evangelicals crime the law president 08 president 08 satire god personal john mccain sexuality holocaust war catholicism books atheism europe sarah palin jesus academia holidays science bible death california middle east music family
Advertisement
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
Oh please couldn’t get a hairdresser!!! Get up and fix your hair yourself you lazy, cunny windbag.
only 2.5 million, poor baby. she may end up like some of the others that had to park their motorhome, or couldn’t finish landscaping the pond.
This sounds eerie similar to another felon’s spouse. Did Barbara Amiel know about the real dealings of her husband Conrad Black. Barbara clearly has the smarts to get ahead without Conrad but marrying him did ensure that she could wear a different outfit every day of the year. This isn’t the first Bernie indicted for shady dealings Kornfeld was the other Bernie, he of Investors Syndicate. Oh we,, cherchez la femme!