| |||||||||
November 5, 2008 | 6:48 pm
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg
I friend told me a few months ago that she felt bad for Sarah Palin. She had been elevated too high too quickly, and the move would likely cost her a promising political career. Agreed, though I don’t think that is a bad thing.
I’ve blogged more than many of you would like about Palin during the past 10 weeks. I’m glad to say goodbye to the Alaska governor. First, though, please indulge this post, courtesy of Fox News’ campaign reporter Carl Cameron.
It turns out Cameron had been told some very embarrassing things about Palin, but on the condition that he not report them until after the election. Well, that day was today. Here’s what Cameron said:
CAMERON: There was great concern in the McCain campaign that Sarah Palin lacked a degree of knowledgeability necessary to be a running mate, a vice president, and a heartbeat away from the presidency.
We are told by folks that she didn’t know what countries were in NAFTA — the North American Free Trade Agreement. That being Canada, the U.S., and Mexico. We’re told that she didn’t understand that Africa was a continent, rather than a series — a country just in itself. A whole host of questions that caused serious problems about her knowledgeability.
Also turns out Palin refused media training before her disastrous interview with Katie Couric. No surprise there. For a reminder, watch the video after the jump:
11.20.09 at 4:22 pm | Vivid Entertainment wants to distribute Prejean’s . . .
11.19.09 at 10:48 am | A New Mexico soccer plays gets violent on the . . .
11.18.09 at 1:51 pm | The home of The Family is losing . . .
11.18.09 at 12:40 pm | These aren’t the kind of prayers you offer for an . . .
11.17.09 at 9:11 am | . . .
11.17.09 at 7:00 am | Heaven and hell on ESPN . . .
10.15.07 at 7:01 am | . . . (597)
6.2.08 at 9:48 am | Despite so much talk to the contrary, Jews are . . . (570)
10.27.09 at 6:00 am | The number of invitation I get to picket . . . (266)
We welcome your feedback.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
judaism israel christianity politics media los angeles barack obama islam anti-semitism entertainment america american jews sports evangelicals crime the law president 08 president 08 satire god personal john mccain sexuality holocaust war books catholicism atheism europe jesus sarah palin academia holidays science death california middle east bible music family
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
Yet another case of bash Palin first and ask questions later. You may consider Cameron a qualified journalist, but doesn’t the anonymous sourcing fail the smell test? Cameron is the means, the scoop is the opportunity, now for the motive:
Let’s ask ourselves: Who lost the election by a landslide?
It was NOT McCain and Palin.
In the face of
- A disastrous Republican adminstration approval rating,
- A Democrat with the appeal of a legendary historic sweep
- Being outspent between SIX to one over the course of the last two years and two to one for the Presidential campaign alone (a betrayal of Obama’s agreement with McCain)
- An insane, fumbled and suspicious buildup of multiple staggering economic crises and especially immediately upon McCain/Palin’s post-convention bounce
- Sheer greater numbers of Democratic and minority voters
- A relentless, outrageous and corrupt media campaign against Palin that has not stopped yet.
- Etc.
... in the face of all that, McCain and I say at least as much Palin brought out a popular vote to within two percent of the opposition. A few more votes in complacent Republican states such as Alaska itself (where they easily won by two to one), or flipping just half of the difference would make it a tie.
No, it was the Republican campaign staff and strategy that failed unforgivably. The landslide was electoral, not popular. But these highly paid a$$holes are all looking for jobs, and what will they put on their resumes? They HAVE to smear Palin or accept that responsibility.
But Cameron is not professional enough to tell us that his information is written on toilet paper. Such stupid charges. btw, the name Carl Cameron is known to every Jew-hater as the man who spread innuendos (from unnamed sources again) about Jewish spying and involvement in the 911 attacks.
And speaking of unnamed sources, looky here
A note (ostensibly) from a former Obama staffer. All good stuff, but here is about Palin:
Palin remains a formidable political threat, and they won’t let up on her.