|
|

Advertisement
May 23, 2008 | 12:24 am
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg
| Tweet |

Look beyond the kissing dudes to the folks protesting the ruling of California’s Supreme Court regarding same-sex marriage. The message reminds me of another guy nobody takes seriously.
By the way, it was nice to see Mollie at GetReligion shares my frustration with the poorly reported, knee-jerk news features about how Christians were struggling with and celebrating the court’s decision.
5.25.12 at 4:02 pm | Judge Wilken held that the Defense of Marriage. . .
5.24.12 at 9:49 pm | Though Maryland does not recognize same-sex. . .

5.24.12 at 2:43 pm | Maybe the most racist job posting you've ever. . .

5.23.12 at 7:19 pm | The former MLB star is pushing 40 but isn't done. . .
5.22.12 at 10:28 am | Christianity Today reports that .... . .
5.21.12 at 9:03 pm | Harold Camping had predicted that .... . .

11.26.11 at 12:14 pm | A new book of essays provides .... . . (1356)

5.24.12 at 2:43 pm | Maybe the most racist job posting you've ever. . . (222)

12.13.11 at 12:24 pm | What was really behind Matisyahu shaving his. . . (179)


We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
judaism christianity israel politics media islam los angeles barack obama entertainment anti-semitism america sports american jews evangelicals crime the law satire president 08 president 08 god personal john mccain holocaust sexuality war catholicism holidays jesus books europe atheism sarah palin academia science bible death middle east california music iran
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
God's Blog
God for President
Book Bits
Caption Contest
Jewish genius
Strange science
Who is a Jew?
World of Worship
Blogs
Bloggish-mobile
Foodaism-mobile
Hollywood Jew-mobile
Jews and Mormons-mobile
Keeping it Real-mobile
Keeping the Faith-mobile
Morethodoxy-mobile
Nice Jewish Doctor-mobile
Rosners Domain-mobile
Tattletales-mobile
The God Blog-mobile
The Ticket-moblie
Leisure-mobile
Multimedia-iPad
Photos-iPad
Videos-iPad
Passover Reader
| |||||||||
Both the protesters and the homophiliacs are correct; marriage is a religious issue. As long as society and religious institutions were on the same page it was fine, now that society has changed religions must suck it in and sacrifice a government-sponsored definition of marriage. While religious institions may be free to recognize what they wish, the government should only recognize marriages for couples producing children (or those who specifically have produced children). Not for sterile or celibate or gay couples. Or groups. Or herds or prides or gaggles.
it is too good because they do not spoil the life of a female & they can enjoy their sexual life according to their wish.
A history teacher once told me “It is the responsibility of the majority to protect the minority from the majority.” It seems that the majority has been remiss in its responsibility here.
We have learned to fly the air like birds and swim the sea like fish, but we have not learned the simple art of living together as brothers.
Martin Luther King
The only reason your history teacher said that is because the reverse is too obvious. Don’t the majority have a right to be protected from the minority?
Why is it a lack of protection to deny homosexuals a non-existent right to marriage? They got a dismissal of of criminality and they got tolerance. Marriage is not something they need above what they have, it is something they are forcing on everybody else. We don’t want to recognize their relationships as equivalent to normal ones.