September 3, 2008 | 11:09 am
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg

Just days after John McCain plucked Sarah Palin as his running mate, the Alaskan governor paid a visit to AIPAC to voice her support for Israel, something she definitely needed to do because of her support for Pat Buchanan’s 2000 presidential campaign.
Unlike McCain and Barack Obama, who dueled at AIPAC’s policy conference in June, Palin offered no sweeping statements regarding Jerusalem or Israel’s threat from Iran. She settled for the much more diplomatic commitment to “work to expand and deepen the strategic partnership between U.S. and Israel.“
Every legitimate candidate pays such respect to AIPAC and the U.S.-Israel relationship. But does she mean it? Considering McCain’s record, I’d imagine so.
We welcome your feedback.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
Advertisement
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
God's Blog
God for President
Book Bits
Caption Contest
Jewish genius
Strange science
Who is a Jew?
World of Worship
Advertisements

Advertisements
According to spokesman Josh Block (from the huffingtonpost), “... we were pleased that Gov. Palin expressed her deep, personal, and lifelong commitment to the safety and well-being of Israel.“
That’s what I am looking for. NOT the deep, abiding etc. close relaionship of the USA and Israel. Imporatnt as it is, it transient and dependent, Biden-style.