|
|

Advertisement
August 2, 2008 | 1:01 pm
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg
| Tweet |

A new image from boingboing
The original image of this creature, seen here, left people a bit breathless. Was it a dog with a beak or a sea turtle with long legs? Were we glad it was found dead on a Long Island beach and not alive in Manhattan like the lice in “Cloverfield?” Was its appearance the beginning of The End?
Relax. Armageddon is not upon us, and from the looks of this new image of the Montauk Monster, the curious creature was nothing more than a badly decomposed dog.
That was, of course, the most obvious explanation early on. For more background and Monty the monster’s Jewish connection, read GeekHeeb.
2.9.12 at 2:19 pm | A video that is sure to get some attention. . .
2.8.12 at 6:08 pm | Like many Californians, Seventh-day Adventists. . .
2.8.12 at 2:40 pm | Robin Tyler, a Jewish activist, and Diane Olson. . .
2.8.12 at 2:24 pm | Romney's faith is so interwoven with his identity. . .
2.7.12 at 9:15 pm | Mollie Ziegler Hemingway and Amy Sullivan debate. . .
2.7.12 at 4:46 pm | In affirming that the California voter-passed. . .
11.26.11 at 12:14 pm | A new book of essays provides .... . . (1696)
2.8.12 at 6:08 pm | Like many Californians, Seventh-day Adventists. . . (325)
2.9.12 at 2:19 pm | A video that is sure to get some attention. . . (318)

We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
judaism israel christianity politics media islam los angeles barack obama entertainment anti-semitism america sports american jews evangelicals crime the law president 08 satire president 08 god personal john mccain sexuality holocaust war holidays catholicism books europe jesus atheism sarah palin academia science bible middle east death california family music
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
God's Blog
God for President
Book Bits
Caption Contest
Jewish genius
Strange science
Who is a Jew?
World of Worship
Blogs
Bloggish-mobile
Foodaism-mobile
Hollywood Jew-mobile
Jews and Mormons-mobile
Keeping it Real-mobile
Keeping the Faith-mobile
Morethodoxy-mobile
Nice Jewish Doctor-mobile
Rosners Domain-mobile
Tattletales-mobile
The God Blog-mobile
The Ticket-moblie
Leisure-mobile
Multimedia-iPad
Photos-iPad
Videos-iPad
| |||||||||
HELLO PEOPLE LOOK AT THIS PIC, AND LOOK AT THE FIRST PIC. THEY ARE 2 DIFFERENT PICS. THIS CURRENT PIC IS OF A DEAD DOG. IF U WANT PROOF, LOOK AT THE TEETH AND MOUTH: THIS ONE HAS 2 SIDE TEETH LIKE A DOG AND THE MONTAUK MONSTER HAS A BEAK!!!
Use common sense here - obviously this is a badly decomposed dog. There is no beak, but what looks like a beak is clearly the decomposition of the dog’s snout. Just imagine a hairless dog - end of story.
WOW PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
clearly the first set and second set of photo’s are diffrent beasts!!!! the second set is just a dead dog! and by the looks of it the second set of photos where released to make people think its a dog, i think the first set was a raccoon, or something from the gov.&/or plum island.
It’s the same animal, just a different angle that makes the nose bone appear more beak-like. Take a look at the darker discoloration of the “beak” angle. You can see the same discoloration where it begins from this angle. It’s simply the exposed bone where the dog’s nose used to be. Take a look at a canine skull and you will see what I mean. Everyone so wants to believe in something outrageous that they refuse to see the facts. There was never a beak.
OK. YOU IDIOTS!! Its a DOG. My case…
1. it has FUR under its neck
2. It has the same teeth as a dog. Most likely a scavenger picked his nose or face off.
3. You know how hair still grows after your dead? Well those growths coming out of th hands might be its nails. THEY GROW TOO! Look at the hands without the growths. It looks like a dogs paws!!
4. Its back feet resemble a dogs
5. It has been decomposed so it doesn’t really LOOK the same. Though lots of the thigns about it are EXACTLY what a dog would look like.
6. It resembles a pit bull or a boxer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We thought its ears (it HAS ears) were set pretty far back from the face, but I showed my friend a picture of a pit bull. It was an EXACT twin to the one above. If any scientist are reading this, we’d just like to tell you we’re 12. Me and My friend figured this all out by a guess from one of our mothers. She said “Oh well it kinda looks like a dog to me.” And we figured out all the rest. REALLY. Look at this picture. ITS A PIT BULL.
Someone probably had a dog who died, put it in the ocean, and it washed ashore. OOORRRRRR it drowned in the water. Or something natural killed it. It IS a dog. A turtle is a possible choice but TURTLES DON’T HAVE FUR.
As you can tell, many people are believing its a dog..i also believe this BUT i dont think its a dog of our known knowlegde..Its face does NOT have a dip in it.The feet are webbed, and i have taken apart a dog in science class, the nose does NOT look like that underneath, clearly, its a new breed.
Nails do not continue to grow after one dies. Death is a process; and just as the body bloats after death, cuticles begin to recede causing nails to appear as if they are still growing. Your case is valid, as it IS your opinion. My own opinion remains to be seen, however I do not 100% believe it to be a dog. I do not 100% believe it to be anything in particular. I will not say it IS a dog, because I was not there to identify the poor creature (given that it is indeed real and not simply a hoax,) and I will not sit here at my computer and study a picture and out right declare it as any one thing. Thoughts, ideas, maybes, “it looks like” and “what if’s” are fine. Pretending I know what it is and telling everyone else they are idiots for continuing to wonder…well…that’s just silly.
Could this be the terrible result of an pit bull fight that did not go as the owner wanted it to??? :(
this is not a DOG!! this is some kind monster! we need more info on it!
Sure looks like a Pit Bull or similar mix to me. We have a Pit Bull, and it has large “fingers” and claws, very pronounced front leg muscles, and a thin pointed tail, just like this animal.
Next time (hopefully) they will keep some tissue and have it tested.