|
|

Advertisement
October 29, 2008 | 10:02 pm
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg
| Tweet |

The Los Angeles Times was flooded with phone calls today. When I tried to reach Editor Russ Stanton, it seemed his phone had been left off the hook; it went straight to voicemail. His phone number had been listed on an incalculable number of conservative blogs, and angry readers were calling to demand that the paper release a videotape it mentioned in an April article titled, “Friends of Palestinians See a Friend in Obama.”
The article described a 2003 farewell dinner for scholar Rashid Khalidi, an at times harsh critic of Israel. The evening carried a few verbal assaults on Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians, and present for these protests was Khalidi’s friend, Barack Obama. The Times broke this story in April, but some folks have become convinced that because the paper refuses to release the video they must be covering up something (i.e. Obama drinking the blood of a Jewish child).
Yesterday the McCain campaign demanded the paper release the tape. Today John McCain, who likened an evening with Khalidi to a neo-Nazi rally, and Sarah Palin accused the Times of protecting Obama. Forget the fact that McCain once chaired an organization that gave $500,000 to Khalidi’s Center for Palestine Research and Studies. Meanwhile, the Internet has gone nuts.
The most ridiculous move has been the republishing, over and over, of a supposed scoop from the hitherto unknown Doug Ross, who claims to have been told from someone in the know just what Obama can be heard saying on the tape:
Saw a clip from the tape. Reason we can’t release it is because statements Obama said to rile audience up during toast. He congratulates Khalidi for his work saying “Israel has no God-given right to occupy Palestine” plus there’s been “genocide against the Palestinian people by Israelis.”
It would be really controversial if it got out. That’s why they will not even let a transcript get out.
If that was true it would be controversial—though anti-Zionist Jews agree with the first statement and Benny Morris with the latter. That is neither here nor there. The reality is this drama, like so many this year, play off the electorate’s most prejudicial fears.
After parroting Ross’ quotes, Little Green Footballs offered this:
“Caveat: I can’t vouch for the accuracy of this. However, it certainly would explain why the LA Times is suppressing the video.”
Talk about reaching a conclusion without establishing your premise.
I’m not saying the L.A. Times is being an exemplar of transparency here. I imagine the paper has its reasons; I just wish they explained it a bit more clearly—like why exactly they can’t release a transcript, which a spokeswoman told me there was no plan to do.
5.25.12 at 4:02 pm | Judge Wilken held that the Defense of Marriage. . .
5.24.12 at 9:49 pm | Though Maryland does not recognize same-sex. . .

5.24.12 at 2:43 pm | Maybe the most racist job posting you've ever. . .

5.23.12 at 7:19 pm | The former MLB star is pushing 40 but isn't done. . .
5.22.12 at 10:28 am | Christianity Today reports that .... . .
5.21.12 at 9:03 pm | Harold Camping had predicted that .... . .

11.26.11 at 12:14 pm | A new book of essays provides .... . . (1333)

5.24.12 at 2:43 pm | Maybe the most racist job posting you've ever. . . (221)

12.13.11 at 12:24 pm | What was really behind Matisyahu shaving his. . . (177)


We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
judaism christianity israel politics media islam los angeles barack obama entertainment anti-semitism america sports american jews evangelicals crime the law satire president 08 president 08 god personal john mccain holocaust sexuality war catholicism holidays jesus books europe atheism sarah palin academia science bible death middle east california music iran
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
God's Blog
God for President
Book Bits
Caption Contest
Jewish genius
Strange science
Who is a Jew?
World of Worship
Blogs
Bloggish-mobile
Foodaism-mobile
Hollywood Jew-mobile
Jews and Mormons-mobile
Keeping it Real-mobile
Keeping the Faith-mobile
Morethodoxy-mobile
Nice Jewish Doctor-mobile
Rosners Domain-mobile
Tattletales-mobile
The God Blog-mobile
The Ticket-moblie
Leisure-mobile
Multimedia-iPad
Photos-iPad
Videos-iPad
Passover Reader
| |||||||||
Brad, It is so obvious it’s absurd. Dinners that a guy like Khalidi are guests of honor of invariably turn in to anti-semitic/ anti-Israel exercises. If it wasn’t they would have released the tape. But it was and they won’t. You could have a picture of Obama in a storm troopers uniform wearing a kaffiyeh at a testimonial for Samir Kuntar. And 75% of American Jews would still vote for the guy. Why, because he is a Democrat.
Mr. Pearlman—you are clearly anti-Obama (maybe you believe he is a secret Muslim??), but I would ask you how you then justify that John McCain’s organization (he was the chairman) gave Khalidi and his Palestinian studies organization several grants, including one of almost half a million dollars. Is this qualitatively “better” than Obama attending a farewell dinner for Khalidi?
It just appears to me that a) some Jews are looking for excuses, no matter how weak, to justify not voting for Obama on grounds other than personal economic selfishness, and/or b) some Jews are so prejudiced against Muslims and Arabs to the degree that they can not tolerate any contact with them at all. In either case, McCain’s huge financial contribution to Khaledi and the Center for Palestine Research and Studies certainly appears to more egregious than Obama’s merely attending a single rubber chicken dinner event.
I haven’t heard anyone mention that perhaps the LA Times knows what it is doing. Ms. Sullivan’s response to the allegation that they (LA TIMES) had been in the tank for Obama in suppressing the tape, was that in fact they had been the paper to release the story, and she was going to let the story speak for itself.
Well, I suggest she really meant that, knowing that what we DON’T see in its fullness is far more damaging to Obama than the unknown.This way the LA Times is still alligned with the popular liberal candidate, but has effectively hobbled his reputation and effectiveness….not just in this campaign…but should he be elected. The Jewish population are all abuzz over this….you can be sure. And anything that touches our Jewish citizens….deeply influence the Christians which are not limited to the right.
Jeffrey Ellis
You have it backwards. McCain’s one-time grasping at straws allocation to Khalidi’s think-tank for research does not compare to the years-long personal and political and professional and financial realtionship Obama has had with Khalidi AND his wife, including multiple instances of major funding to their anti-Israel programs.