| |||||||||
September 11, 2007 | 7:08 am
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg

M.J. Rosenberg, director of policy analysis at the Israel Policy Forum, penned a piece last week that asks people to not be so knee-jerk about “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy,” whose authors argue, Rosenberg wrote, that the pro-Israel community’s advocacy is not always in the best interest of Israel or the United States.
I spent almost 20 years as a Congressional aide and can testify from repeated personal experience that Senators and House Members are under constant pressure to support status quo policies on Israel. It is no accident that Members of Congress compete over who can place more conditions on aid to the Palestinians, who will be first to denounce the Saudi peace plan, and who will win the right to be the primary sponsor of the next pointless Palestinian-bashing resolution. Nor is it an accident that there is never a serious Congressional debate about policy toward Israel and the Palestinians. Moreover, every President knows that any serious effort to push for an Israeli-Palestinian agreement based on compromise by both sides will produce loud (sometimes hysterical) opposition from the Hill.
Walt and Mearsheimer mostly limit themselves to exploring whether all this is good for the United States (and to a lesser extent, Israel). The question I ask today, and not for the first time, is whether this type of behavior is good for Israel. Forty years after the Six Day War, the occupation continues, the resistance to it intensifies, and Israelis in increasing numbers question whether they have a future in the Jewish state. Has “pro-Israel” advocacy consistently produced “pro-Israel” ends? At several critical moments, it most certainly has not.
Read those occasions here. There have, of course, been plenty who disagree with the possibility that Walt and Mearsheimer are philo-Semitic, constructively critical observers. But Rosenberg makes an important point, the same one actually that legendary muckraker Seymour Hersh made when I interviewed him for a piece that will run in The Jewish Journal next week. “This government and that relationship is really profound,” Hersh said, “and it is just very secret between us and Israel. It is not transparent, and that is not healthy for anybody.”
2.9.10 at 5:06 pm | A Toyota crashed into a synagogue in . . .
2.9.10 at 11:20 am | After a year in the White House, President Barack . . .
2.9.10 at 8:08 am | Transforming Los Angeles has been . . .
2.8.10 at 10:38 pm | The annual conference for young Jews will . . .
2.8.10 at 10:12 am | . . .
2.7.10 at 9:22 pm | The controversy that shouldn’t have been . . .
10.15.07 at 7:01 am | . . . (1011)
6.2.08 at 9:48 am | Despite so much talk to the contrary, Jews are . . . (892)
9.4.07 at 4:24 am | . . . (457)
We welcome your feedback.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
judaism israel christianity politics media islam los angeles barack obama entertainment anti-semitism america sports american jews evangelicals crime the law satire president 08 president 08 god personal john mccain holocaust sexuality war catholicism holidays books europe atheism jesus sarah palin academia science bible middle east death california family music
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
God's Blog
God for President
Book Bits
Caption Contest
Jewish genius
Strange science
Who is a Jew?
World of Worship
Advertisements