Advertisement
July 10, 2007 | 5:05 am

This is a gripe I will return to throughout the 2008 presidential election, in which hopefuls already are pandering to Americans’ desire to connect religiously with the commander-in-chief (probably because of this). I personally think it is dangerous to put too much stock in anything pols say. That goes double when they’ve talking about religion, something they know you want to hear but have no means for measuring their sincerity.
That being said, proceed at your own peril with this 2,093-word story in the New York Times about how Sen. Hillary Clinton’s Christian faith taught her to forgive and much, much more.
âWe all have things that oftentimes weâre upset about, or ashamed of, or feel guilty over, and so many people carry these enormous burdens around,â Mrs. Clinton said in a recent interview. âOne of the great gifts of faith is to let it go.â
The themes of wrongs, forgiveness and reconciliation have played out repeatedly in Mrs. Clintonâs life, as she has endured the ordeal of her husbandâs infidelity, engaged in countless political battles and shared a deep, mutual distrust with adversaries.
Her Methodist faith, Mrs. Clinton says, has guided her as she sought to repair her marriage, forgiven some critics who once vilified her and struggled in the bare-knuckles world of politics to fulfill the biblical commandment to love thy neighbor.
Mrs. Clinton, the New York senator who is seeking the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, has been alluding to her spiritual life with increasing regularity in recent years, language that has dovetailed with efforts by her party to reach out to churchgoers who have been voting overwhelmingly Republican.
Mrs. Clintonâs references to faith, though, have come under attack, both from conservatives who doubt her sincerity (one writer recently lumped her with the type of Christians who âbelieve in everything but Godâ) and liberals who object to any injection of religion into politics. And her motivations have been cast as political calculation by detractors, who suggest she is only trying to moderate her liberal image.
âMany people have developed opinions about her,â said John C. Green, senior fellow at the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. âSenator Clinton has a long history of involvement in religious matters and appears to be a person of deep and sincere faith, but a lot of people donât perceive her that way.â
Obviously her husband and Monica Lewinsky are not far from the story, from Clinton’s tales of trials overcome. Thematically, the article ends right where it began.
âThe whole idea of the new covenant was really a new relationship with God, a sense that we could be forgiven, that we could seek both personally and through our relationships with others that gift of forgiveness,â she said. âItâs instrumental in life.â
(A Google image search for “hillary clinton praying“ doesn’t turn up photos of the senator in prayer but instead, it appears, web pages for people praying she doesn’t end up in the White House.)
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in 1 Comments — Leave your comment
We welcome your feedback.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
Advertisement
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
Parshat Vayechi (Genesis 47:28-50:26) God is constantly evolving, constantly becoming, and so should we.
Brad A. Greenberg reports from today's pro-Israel rally outside the Federal Building in Westwood.
What else explains the collective amnesia on display?
Clinton’s commebnts on “wrongs, forgiveness and reconciliation” seem to cheapen what religion is supposed to be about. While the Christian faith may see all as sinners, it is not rational to see their faith as a “Get Out Of Jail Free” card to be used regularly like an ATM. If there is no real contrition by the wrong-doer then where is the lesson. How does life progress for the good of the soul and man when these sins are erased through personally prescribed “indulgences”?