
Advertisement
October 21, 2010 | 12:22 am
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg
I read a story yesterday that I didn’t really know what to do with. It was the first version of the Ginni Thomas story, and it was courtesy of The New York Times. (I spent the last hour looking for a cheesy media nickname for the “scandal”—you know, something like Apologygate or Mountains OuttAnitaHills.) For those who have missed the newest media darling, here’s a quick recap:
Little less than two weeks ago, almost exactly 19 years to the day after Anita Hill came forward during Clarence Thomas’ Supreme Court confirmation hearings with allegations of sexual harassment, Thomas’ wife, Virginia, called Hill’s office at Brandeis University and left a message asking her to apologize. Ginni Thomas later told the NYT that the early morning call was “an olive branch,” but it wasn’t. And, regardless, what I wanted to talk about was exactly what Thomas’ message said.
“Good morning Anita Hill, it’s Ginni Thomas. I just wanted to reach across the airwaves and the years and ask you to consider something. I would love you to consider an apology sometime and some full explanation of why you did what you did with my husband.
“So give it some thought. And certainly pray about this and hope that one day you will help us understand why you did what you did. O.K., have a good day.”
Pray about this ...Consider me a bit hypersensitive to guilt—it’s the Catholic and Jewish roots—but that’s laying it on a bit thick, don’t you think? It’s also an odd statement between two women whom, I presume, haven’t talked in two decades.
Calling someone to prayer is something that requires a relationship, especially when the call is sparked by a perceived wrongful act. (Shall we call it a sin?) So even if Ginni Thomas’ bizarre call to Hill was motivated by a sense that she was her sister’s keeper—and that’s a massive “if”—she really wasn’t in a place to do so.
11.3.12 at 6:40 am | Back to blogging in August 2013 ...
8.20.12 at 12:22 am | Reuters reports that coordinated prayers at ...
8.19.12 at 9:04 pm | In particular, when journalists are identifying. . .
8.18.12 at 9:56 pm | Running afoul of zoning ordinances and an. . .
8.18.12 at 8:33 pm | Some research suggests the numbers are rising but. . .
8.17.12 at 3:41 pm | At an anti-Israel rally in Tehran on Friday, the. . .
5.7.09 at 11:02 am | In an interview with Danielle Berrin ... (144)

4.11.10 at 9:04 pm | Not to pick on Lefty, who won the Masters today. . . (100)
11.6.07 at 3:28 am | (97)


We welcome your feedback.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com reserves the right to use your comment in our weekly print publication.
judaism israel christianity politics media islam los angeles barack obama entertainment anti-semitism america sports american jews evangelicals crime the law satire president 08 president 08 god personal john mccain holocaust sexuality war catholicism holidays books jesus europe atheism sarah palin bible academia science middle east death music california iran
November 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
| |||||||||