| |||||||||
May 1, 2009 | 12:04 pm
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg
Prosecutors today asked a federal judge to drop the charges against two former top AIPAC staffers accused of conspiring to obtain, and then disclosing, classified information. JTA reports:
In a statement Friday, the acting U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia said restrictions on the government’s case imposed by Judge T.S. Ellis III made conviction unlikely.
“Given the diminished likelihood the government will prevail at trial under the additional intent requirements imposed by the court and the inevitable disclosure of classified information that would occur at any trial in this matter, we have asked the court to dismiss the indictment,” Dana Boente said.
The motion all but guarantees a dismissal.
“Intent requirements” refers to an earlier Ellis ruling that the government must prove that Keith Weissman, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s former Iran analyst, and Steve Rosen, its former foreign policy chief, intended not only to assist Israel but to harm the United States.
Weissman and Rosen were charged under a rarely used section of the 1917 Espionage Act that makes it a crime for civilians to receive and distribute closely held defense information. Both men were later dismissed by AIPAC, with the organization claiming the two had violated its rules; Rosen has filed a multimillion dollar lawsuit against AIPAC.
Reached by phone, Rosen told JTA he was “ecstatic” and was “still absorbing a life-changing moment.” He said he had been on the phone Friday morning nonstop with family and friends.
“There was a great injustice here, but thank God we live in a country where the courts can correct this kind of injustice,” he said.
I wonder what this means for Rep. Jane Harman.
Jeff Stein, the CQ columnist who broke the Harman story, just wrote that “the Justice Department’s decision to drop espionage charges against two pro-Israel lobbyists will certainlypour jet fuel on conspiracy theories burning up the blogosphere.” And I’m sure he’s right. Jews and conspiracy theories have a storied, albeit painful, history.
More to come on this. One of my editors is promising that Michael Berenbaum will have “analysis and inside info” at the Bloggish staff and contributor blog this afternoon.
3.21.10 at 8:48 am | A little religion in the NCAA basketball tourney . . .
3.19.10 at 11:09 am | In response to a student body resolution . . .
3.18.10 at 8:52 am | Domestication of dogs traced to Middle East . . .
3.18.10 at 5:12 am | . . .
3.17.10 at 2:32 pm | Grab a barf bowl . . .
3.17.10 at 12:57 pm | The ancient city is under siege . . .
10.15.07 at 7:01 am | . . . (473)
6.2.08 at 10:48 am | Despite so much talk to the contrary, Jews are . . . (449)
3.18.10 at 8:52 am | Domestication of dogs traced to Middle East . . . (353)
We welcome your feedback.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
judaism israel christianity politics media islam los angeles barack obama entertainment anti-semitism america sports american jews evangelicals crime the law satire president 08 president 08 god personal john mccain holocaust sexuality war holidays catholicism books europe atheism jesus sarah palin academia science bible middle east california death music capitalism
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
God's Blog
God for President
Book Bits
Caption Contest
Jewish genius
Strange science
Who is a Jew?
World of Worship
Surprahz, surprahz.
Hmmm, “Intent requirements” refers to an earlier Ellis ruling that the government must prove that ...[they] intended not only to assist Israel but to harm the United States.”
Can we get that ruling invoked for Jonathan Pollard? How about a pardon, Prez?