The God Blog

Email | Print | Text - Text +

August 20, 2008 | 10:51 am

Columnist: Rick Warren wins, America loses

Photo

“At the risk of heresy, let it be said that setting up the two presidential candidates for religious interrogation by an evangelical minister—no matter how beloved—is supremely wrong,“ Kathleen Parker writes in her column in today’s Washington Post. “It is also un-American.“

Since Barack Obama and John McCain appeared on stage at Saddleback Church on Saturday, the discussion has centered around who gave the most meaningful answers to the Rev. Rick Warren’s questions about good and evil, and whether McCain had an unfair advantage by speaking second.

It’s natural by now for someone to take the contrarian’s position and indicate a fundamental flaw in the whole process. But Parker has a very valid point. As I’ve said over and over again, the religious litmus for presidential office that developed during the past eight years is a very bad thing for American politics.

Randall Balmer, editor-at-large for Christianity Today writes about this evolution in “God in the White House,“ which he discusses on NPR’s “Fresh Air” today. (Audio and a book excerpt here.) And Parker gets it right when explaining why this should make us uncomfortable, and in indicating that we shouldn’t trust what we hear. She continues:

The past few decades of public confession and Oprah-style therapy have prepared us perfectly for a televangelist probing politicians about their moral failings. Warren’s Q&A wasn’t an inquisition exactly, but viewers would be justified in squirming.

What is the right answer, after all? What happens to the one who gets evil wrong? What’s a proper relationship with Jesus? What’s next? Interrogations by rabbis, priests and imams? What candidate would dare decline on the basis of mere principle?

Both Obama and McCain gave “good” answers, but that’s not the point. They shouldn’t have been asked. Is the American electorate now better prepared to cast votes knowing that Obama believes that “Jesus Christ died for my sins and I am redeemed through him,“ or that McCain feels that he is “saved and forgiven”?

What does that mean, anyway? What does it prove? Nothing except that these men are willing to say whatever they must—and what most Americans personally feel is no one’s business—to win the highest office.

Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in God for President | 8 Comments — Leave your comment

Tags: politics, religion, rick warren

Share this post: del.icio.us Favicondel.icio.us Digg FaviconDigg Facebook FaviconFacebook Google FaviconGoogle Reddit FaviconReddit StumbleUpon FaviconStumbleUpon Technorati FaviconTechnorati YahooMyWeb FaviconYahooMyWeb

COMMENTS

We welcome your feedback.

Privacy Policy

Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.

I completely disagree.  Faith is worldview and we need to understand our candidates worldview and how that worldview impacts their thoughts and actions.  If a man or woman is of Jewish faith I want to know how that impacts his or her political thinking.  To ignore the fundamental philosophical beliefs of our candidates is foolish.  Congratulations to Rick for doing a great job and allowing all Americans to get new insight into our candidates.

Comment by brett on 8/20/08 at 7:03 pm

The thing is, brett, we shouldn’t be interested in electing a priest or rabbi.  We should be interested in what the candidates think in terms of good secular governance, because neither you nor anyone else want a person of a different faith in office who will enforce the laws and uphold the Constitution based on their faith instead of yours.

Well, nobody _should_ want that.  Those who do want that (and I know they exist) are often not willing to suffer the consequences of a person of the “wrong” faith being elected, though.  If, that is, the “wrong” people are going to be granted the same leeway towards “faith-based governance” as the “right” people.

Or was Kennedy really governing as a proxy for the Pope?

Comment by Dave W. on 8/20/08 at 9:51 pm

Kathleen Parker’s artilces do not belong on the pages of
National Review. With her anti-Palin article, I
believe she should be on staff at Dailykos.
When Parker runs a city and a state ... and,
successfully fight’s corruption ... and gets a
9 billion dollar energy project for her state, and generates an 85% approval rating from her state,
maybe then her credibility, and opinion would be worth something.
Instead, she is merely a critic, who from the sidelines, has betrayed Republicans, and the readership of Nationalreview

Comment by Gina on 9/27/08 at 7:58 am

As I said elsewhere, stating religious views to religious groups are on the order of kissing babies and eating kishka and egg rolls and kielbasa in their neighborhoods. It is telling that nobody is taking the Bill Maher or P. Z. Myers approach to the question.

Comment by Ben Plonie on 9/27/08 at 5:58 pm

I have always believed that religious beliefs should be kept out of politics.  There are too many interpretations and religion can be a very argumentative topic.

Our country does not need these sorts of complications when it comes to Presidents, Governors, etc

Comment by steve r on 11/08/08 at 12:06 pm

Bloggers and swiftboaters were already saying Obama was the Antichrist; it was decent to let him speak for himself.
Faith is an important part of any leader’s character. Dubya and Reagan displayed little, and er bore the consequences.

Comment by hugh on 11/25/08 at 1:39 pm

I agree with Steve . Religion and Politics completely 2 different thing. But some people mix up this two things.

Comment by Litigation Document Management on 11/26/08 at 4:16 am

It has a lot to do with whether you believe that God creates the State, or that the State creates the god. But every interest group (Freedom of Assembly, remember?) has the right to ask what a candidate is likely to do for or against their interests. The answers can be trusted no more than any other political statement, and the best they can expect is that the candidate will stay off their backs and keep other people off their backs.

The obvious recent example of this is when Proposition 8 opponents tried to use brute government coercion to create a new right by fiat in order to encroach upon an essentially religious institution by enforcing a radical concept of marriage upon a fortunately insufficiently indoctrinated population.

The Prop 8 controversy is a good example. Marriage is a primarily religious statement that the State has mixed into.

Comment by Ben Plonie on 11/26/08 at 12:18 pm

Post a Comment

Name:  
Email:  
URL:  

Type the word you see below:

Comment:

About this Blog

Blog Home
About the Blogger(s)
Contact

RSS


Blog Archive

Blogs

Jewish Journal Blogs


Featured Stories

Cartoons
Where in the world is Joe Lieberman?

Los Angeles
Judge dismisses charges in ‘kidnap’ case

A Los Angeles Superior Court judge last week dismissed the criminal case against four Iranian American Jews. One woman and three men were accused of kidnapping and holding for ransom a man the defendants claimed had cheated them out of $100,000 in a business deal.

Israel
Palestinian civil war casts shadow over peace process

Until now it is unclear whether Obama and his advisers will address the internecine Palestinian conflict as a key component in their Middle East foreign policy. If they fail to confront this critical issue, we risk engaging in yet another failed round of diplomacy. And as we

Torah Portion
Lentil soup

Parshat Toldot (Genesis 25:19-28:9) Why does a mourner eat a round food? The circle represents the circle of life, and it is supposed to remind the mourner that life is cyclical: The tragedy of death that has stricken me today will strike my neighbor tomorrow.

Picks and Clicks
Calendar Girls Picks and Clicks Nov. 29 - Dec. 5: NFL to frum; Shiksa syndrome, ‘Waltz with Bashir’

Music
Danny Goldberg: Hangin’ with the ‘geniuses’ of rock ‘n’ roll

No one ever said the life of a rock 'n' roll star was easy, and if you're the one responsible for their success, keeping an artist both successful and happy can be no less daunting

World
African AIDS fight uses Israeli circumcision skills

The United Nations announced last year that the procedure could reduce the rate of HIV transmission by up to 60 percent. It was in Israel, with its experience performing adult male circumcision on a wide scale, that the international medical community found an unlikely partner

Films
Q&A with producer Jeff Silver: ‘Making fewer films is good’

" . . . Making fewer films is good, because there are too many films in the marketplace and too much pressure to perform in the first weekend. I think it's a market correction to have fewer movies out there, and maybe there will be more of a premium on originality. Right now, there's a lack of ideas in Hollywood. People are recycling ideas, not reinventing them . . . "

Singles
True confessions of an online dating addict #17: Things are not going well

U.S.
SF cops probing death of Israel activist—body found in elevator shaft

Daniel Kliman's body was found Monday in a San Francisco building where he was taking Arabic classes. It had been at the bottom of the elevator shaft since Nov. 25, building manager Brad Bernheim told the San Francisco Chronicle. There were no classes held last week, and the

Food
Postville Jewish community struggles to survive after raid

After former Agriprocessors executive Sholom Rubashkin was arrested earlier this month, Rashi Raices joined several dozen members of this town's Jewish community in volunteering the equity on their homes to guarantee his return to face trial.

Education
UCLA chancellor Gene Block tackles economy, civic responsibility

Block is known to his colleagues as a workaholic and multitasker but also wins praise for his patience and optimism. He displayed his patience and humor during an hour-long interview at his UCLA office and needs all his optimism to tackle the problems at hand.