May 8, 2008 | 10:16 pm

Torture, Jews and Finkelstein’s ‘fact-finding’

Posted by Brad A. Greenberg

Follow me on

Norman Finkelstein

It’s hard to not set aside your mental faculties when sitting down for a lecture from Norman Finkelstein.

Probably American Jews’ least favorite American Jew, Finkelstein first made his name with “The Holocaust Industry,” in which he accused Jews of exploiting memories of the Holocaust for financial and political gain, and for Israel’s sake; it was well-reviewed by a few, such as Noam Chomsky and Raul Hilberg, and panned by the guy Finkelstein said inspired it, Peter Novick, who said it made “egregious misrepresentations” and “absurd claims.”

Last year, Finkelstein re-entered the spotlight with a beautiful pissing match with Alan Dershowitz of Harvard. With a little assistance from campus activists like StandWithUs, Dershowitz helped push DePaul University into denying its infamous academic tenure.

When I last heard Finkelstein speak, at Cal State Northridge in February, he was booed and hissed for about an hour by leaders of the Jewish Defense League (a group that, to be fair, might be able to make an anti-Semite out of Abe Foxman). His audience last night at UC Irvine was quite a bit more receptive. Having been invited by the Muslim Student Union, whose members have called for the destruction of Israel, Finkelstein kicked off Palestinian awareness week, which this year carries the theme, “Never Again? The Palestinian Holocaust.”

“Is Criticism of Israel Anti-Semitic” was the title of Finkelstein’s speech, but he didn’t get to that topic until minute 83 of his 101-minute address. Instead, he spent most of the time talking about the controversy surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which he said is “contrived, fabricated” to “deflect attention from, and sown confusion about, the documentary record”—one that he claims indicts Israel on just about every human-rights account.

Listening to Finkelstein, you get the impression that Jews really do run the world, and that, as Kevin MacDonald argues, anti-Semitism is just what they had coming. Of course, Finkelstein repeatedly reminded the audience that Jews like he were cast off like chaff for challenging the establishment.

I was drifting in and out, thankful to have a tape recorder, when he said something that caught my attention. On the topic of civilian casualties, Finkelstein indulged a criticism of a familiar target.

There is this journalist writing for The New Yorker magazine, now he writes for The Atlantic magazine; his name is Jeffrey Goldberg. And recently he came out with a book called “Prisoners,” and it was his account of his life in Ansar Three prison camp during the First Intifada. He was a guard in the camp. He also tortured Palestinians, which is to say he is the perfect expert for The New Yorker on the Israel-Palestine conflict.

Finkelstein went on to discuss a scene from the book in which Goldberg snaps at a Hamas official that at least Israeli soldiers don’t try to kill children. (You can hear more of the audio here.) Finkelstein claimed that, in fact, they do. But that is not the point I want to discuss.

I read “Prisoners.” In fact, I really enjoyed “Prisoners,” which I discussed here last summer. Though a mission of hope, the book is, in the end, a lamentation of Israel’s unresolved future and of Goldberg‘s time at Ketziot (AKA Ansar Three), where he served as a guard after making aliyah and living on a liberal kibbutz. What I couldn’t recall in his penance was any discussion of torturing Palestinian prisoners.

A good two hours later, as Finkelstein was being hurried from the podium to a book signing for his fellow travelers, I asked him where he had discovered this information. His answer: In Goldberg’s book.

“He said he sent people to the zinzana; he sent people to the refrigerator,” Finkelstein said. “That is an accessory to, or a, torture.”

Jeffrey Goldberg

Such deduction says a little something about Finkelstein’s insights into human-rights reports. Previously, Finkelstein had claimed that Goldberg was at least aware of the torturing that must have gone on at the prison camp.

Although admitting that he personally sent prisoners to the zinzana, and although liberal in his outrage at the “cruelty” of the tortures Palestinians inflicted on each other, Golderg rejects (albeit indirectly) the insinuation that he himself might be an accessory to torture, if not a torturer himself. When the guards needed “someone to go solitary” for a minor infraction of prison rules, Goldberg recalls at one point , “twenty Arabs immediately volunteered.” He processes this not as a demonstration of their solidarity and courage but rather as vindication that the “Arabs want to be our victim” and “the Geneva Convention said nothing about prisoners who asked to be punished.”

But this was a new indictment.

The zinzana, for that matter, was not described as a room where Palestinians were waterboarded. Translated in rough Arabic, the word means solitary confinement—something you would find at most any prison in the world.

Finkelstein’s scholarship has been discredited before; here are criticisms from the London Review of Books and the

right-wing

pro-Israel, some would say hawkish, groups CAMERA and StandWithUs. So I e-mailed Goldberg with the subject, “Finkelstein accuses you of torturing Palestinians,” and he immediately called my cell.

“That is just ridiculous. I never laid a hand on anybody,” Goldberg told me. “One of my principle roles there was making sure the prisoners had fresh fruit.

“Norman Finkelstein is a ridiculous figure and he is lying and purposely misreading my book. The dishonesty is stunning, but we’ve come to expect it. He is a malignant fantasist. I’d expect nothing less from Hezbollah’s foremost Jewish American spokesman.”

May 8, 2008 | 10:03 pm

How do American Jews love Israel?

Posted by Brad A. Greenberg

My boss, Rob Eshman, contributed a commentary to KPCC yesterday on Israel’s 60th anniversary. His argument was that most American Jews love Israel like little girls love Hannah Montana:

But the problem with crushes is that the instant our crush disappoints us, we become disillusioned. The problem with crushes is we overlook faults until they turn dangerous and tragic.

Israel at 60 is a wonderful achievement. But it also faces monumental problems that cannot be overlooked: it desperately needs to improve the quality of its democracy. It needs to narrow the gaps between rich and poor, between secular and religious, between Arab and Jewish Israelis. It needs to pursue agreements with its enemies. It needs to reject the ideologies that have mired it in the folly of settlements for the past 40 years.

And we who love Israel have to learn to scold it, to correct it, to not stay away out of disillusionment or keep quiet out of deference. The father of Zionism, Theodore Herzl, once said, “Nothing happens as one hopes, nor as one fears.” A real state in the real world doesn’t demand reverence, it demands we raise our voices and get involved.

Crushes are fine when we’re young. But Israel is turning 60; it’s time we grew up too.

Also on this topic, Shmuel Rosner wrote a piece Wednesday for Slate.com that recommends dropping the phrase “pro-Israel” because it is so widely used, it’s lost any meaning.

4 Comments — Leave your comment

May 8, 2008 | 2:07 pm

Long Beach professor justifies anti-Semitism

Posted by Brad A. Greenberg

I do not think Jews are living in 1938 Germany. But it really has seemed lately liked I’ve transitioned to the anti-Semitism beat. Besides posting several items on the topic during the past few days, I spent last night at UC Irvine, listening to a speech from Norman Finkelstein, who has certainly been called an anti-Semite, and that followed two weeks of researching and writing a profile of Kevin MacDonald, a psychology professor at Cal State Long Beach whose books have been compared to “Mein Kampf.”

In the above video, which is 41 minutes long, MacDonald appears on the TV program “Current Issues,” hosted by Palestinian American Hesham Tillawi. The focus of their conversation is the negative influence and clannish behavior of Jews. At the 17-minute mark, MacDonald describes his opinions, detailed in a three-volume series and subsequent essays that can be found at kevinmacdonald.net, as “rational” anti-Semitism.

MacDonald once served as an expert witness for Holocaust-denier David Irving, and many of his theories of Judaism as a “group evolutionary strategy” are controversial. The least palatable are that Judaism has a built in eugenics program—the study of Talmud, which, he claims, stemmed the reproduction of dumber members of the Tribe—and that anti-Semitism, even Nazism, were gentile responses to Jewish success.

He’s been on the faculty of Cal State Long Beach 23 years now, having achieved full tenure in 1994. But the university is under increasing pressure from some of MacDonald’s colleagues and outside organizations to denounce his writings, which, obviously, have very little to do with child psychology and, to his credit, have been kept out of the classroom.

Under the headline, “The Professor Anti-Semites Love,” MacDonald carries this week’s cover for The Jewish Journal. It’s a long profile—from his childhood in Oshkosh to the origins of his research to the contents of his books and the battle against him—so I’ll just mention now the biggest problem MacDonald has had: his anti-Semitic admirers.

As a warning, there will be some very vulgar language from someone who would like to see the fulfillment of the Final Solution:

Read more of this post

15 Comments — Leave your comment

May 8, 2008 | 12:35 pm

Obama: ‘Never waver in our unshakeable commitment to help Israel’

Posted by Brad A. Greenberg

Seeking to dispel rumors, and some news reports to the contrary, Barack Obama has stated several times that he is a passionate believer in a Jewish state in Israel. Obama has won the vote of quite a few Jews, but others remain unwilling to enter the fold. As Israel approaches its 60th anniversary, Obama pledged last night what sounds a lot like unconditional American support.

While threats to its existence have endured, Israelis have built their nation into a strong, vibrant democracy, with a prosperous economy, a rich cultural life, and a deep friendship with the United States that benefits both our peoples in so many ways. Even in hard times, Israelis have so much to be proud of. As the Jewish State continues to grow and prosper, the United States will always stand with Israel to ensure it can defend itself against threat of terrorism and violence, from as close as Gaza and as far as Tehran. We must never waver in our unshakeable commitment [to] help Israel achieve its goal of true security through lasting peace with its neighbors.

0 Comments — Leave your comment

May 7, 2008 | 10:35 am

Religion as a figment of human imagination?

Posted by Brad A. Greenberg

Ever wondered why animals don’t practice religion? It’s a fair question, especially when considering the multitude of beliefs humans have held. The answer, according to economist Maurice Bloch is that animals didn’t evolve the proper mechanics to imagine a universal order.

That leaves hanging a really strange chicken-and-egg question about creation and evolution, but it’s worth reading Bloch’s essay, published here in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B and discussed in this article on NewScientist.com. As you may have surmised from Bloch’s background, his article is based more conjecture than lab work:

Read more of this post

0 Comments — Leave your comment

May 7, 2008 | 9:43 am

Leading evangelicals to condemn group’s politicization

Posted by Brad A. Greenberg

Big statement coming from evangelicals today:

Conservative Christian leaders who believe the word “evangelical” has lost its religious meaning plan to release a starkly self-critical document saying the movement has become too political and has diminished the Gospel through its approach to the culture wars.

The statement, called “An Evangelical Manifesto,” condemns Christians on the right and left for “using faith” to express political views without regard to the truth of the Bible, according to a draft of the document obtained Friday by The Associated Press.

“That way faith loses its independence, Christians become `useful idiots’ for one political party or another, and the Christian faith becomes an ideology,” according to the draft.

The declaration, scheduled to be released Wednesday in Washington, encourages Christians to be politically engaged and uphold teachings such as traditional marriage. But the drafters say evangelicals have often expressed “truth without love,” helping create a backlash against religion during a “generation of culture warring.”

“All too often we have attacked the evils and injustices of others,” they wrote, “while we have condoned our own sins.” They argue, “we must reform our own behavior.”

The Evangelical Manifesto, to be presented at the National Press Club, carries a lot of the mainstream voices that teeter between liberal and conservative politics—a refreshing bit of news for a brand of Christianity that has become far too aligned with political power and the Republican Party.

Read more of this post

2 Comments — Leave your comment

May 7, 2008 | 2:03 am

Nuns prevented from voting

Posted by Brad A. Greenberg

In the comments to the post about the Israel Bible Quiz, Stan Meyer said that Jim Crow is alive and well. Maybe, maybe not. But at least the spirit of exclusionary laws were evident last night in Indiana when nuns were turned away from the polls for lack of ID.

The nuns, all residents of a retirement home at Saint Mary’s Convent near Notre Dame University, were denied ballots by a fellow sister and poll worker because the women, in their 80s and 90s, did not have valid Indiana photo ID cards.

(skip)

“It’s the law, and it makes it hard,” said Sister Julie McGuire, who was working at the polling place and had to explain to the nuns that they could not vote. “Some don’t understand why.”

Indiana requires voters who come to the polls show a photo ID issued by the state or the federal government. The law was pressed by Republicans citing voter fraud and opposed by Democrats and the ACLU, who argued that it would disenfranchise voters.

1 Comments — Leave your comment

May 7, 2008 | 1:52 am

Jew hatred grows as Jewish life does, too

Posted by Brad A. Greenberg

More from the anti-Semitism beat, the NYT has this interesting article about the rise of Jew hatred alongside burgeoning Jewish life in Hungary:

Read more of this post

1 Comments — Leave your comment

May 6, 2008 | 6:09 pm

It’s ‘alleged’ anti-Semitism: a-l-l-e-g-e-d

Posted by Brad A. Greenberg

Like the Wall Street Journal last week, the liberal Israeli daily, Ha’aretz, carried a story this week that convicted the Rev. Eric Lee of saying, “The Jews have made money on us in the music business and we are the entertainers, and they are economically enslaving us.”

Prominent California reverend and black activist Eric Lee has apologized for anti-Semitic comments he said last month at a Los Angeles event commemorating the assassination of Martin Luther King.

The Los Angeles Times on Friday reported a “reconciliation” meeting between the Pastor and Daphna Ziman - an Israeli-American philanthropist and the recipient of this year’s Tom Bradley Award for community service, for whose honor Lee made the keynote speech at an award ceremony in Los Angeles.

During his speech, Lee, the local president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, a civil rights group, is reported to have suddenly launched an anti-Semitic rant, stating that Jews have made money on blacks in the music business.

In fact, there has been much dispute, which I reported several times over, about exactly what Lee said. And the word missing from the above story is “alleged.” It is what Lee is “alleged” to have said. But Ha’aretz’ Shlomo Shamir, like so many people who read Lee’s apology, assumed, apparently without talking with Lee or Daphna Ziman, the Jewish philanthropist whose emailed account of Lee’s speech went viral.

The difference between Shamir’s news article and the Wall Street Journal op-ed by MLK’s former lawyer is just that: One was news and the other opinion. Both, though, need to be accurate.

Read more of this post

3 Comments — Leave your comment

May 6, 2008 | 3:50 pm

‘Not Israel’s deepest thinker’

Posted by Brad A. Greenberg

That was Jeffrey Goldberg‘s response to a comment Prime Minister Ehud Olmert gave him. It appears in this month’s Atlantic cover, and its good fodder for piling on:

I asked Olmert about a flaw of personal concern to me: Why is Israel less physically safe for Jews than America?

He answered: “I’ll tell you something that you have to realize, and this is the most important thing and this is the most significant thing. First of all, no people are safe anywhere, okay? Let me tell you, Jews are not safer in Israel than they are in other parts of the world, but there is only one place that Jews can fight for their lives as Jews, and that is here. They can fight as Americans, they can fight as Australians—but as individuals.” He banged on his desk. “Jews were persecuted, Jews were attacked, Jews were suppressed, Jews were killed. But they could never defend themselves as Jews.”

So the success of the American Jewish community doesn’t lessen the necessity for the state of Israel? “Never, never, no way,” he said. “By the way, Jews in Germany—and I don’t draw any comparison at all—Jews in other parts of the world were very successful all their lives, and that didn’t provide them with safety.”

The prime minister of Israel should be able to muster an argument for the necessity of his country without forecasting a Holocaust in America. His was a careless and cynical statement, one that supports the notion that he is not Israel’s deepest thinker.

4 Comments — Leave your comment

May 6, 2008 | 12:46 pm

NY Post: Financier allegedly bribed Israel’s Olmert

Posted by Brad A. Greenberg

A Long Island mogul is at the center of a sensational bribery scandal that could bring down embattled Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, The Post has learned.

Millionaire financier Morris Talansky—who runs an investment firm out of his tony home in Woodmere—allegedly passed money to Olmert while the politician was mayor of Jerusalem in the ‘90s, sources said.

In a highly unusual move, Israeli authorities have barred the country’s media from publishing Talansky’s name - revealed now in The Post - saying it could hamper their investigation. Israeli media has referred only to the involvement of an “American businessman.”

Talansky is apparently set to sing to Israeli authorities about his alleged role in the scheme, sources said.

“It looks serious, and it looks like they have a state witness” in Talansky, one source said.

Talansky - a philanthropist and political contributor to everyone from Rudy Giuliani to Bill Clinton - is in Jerusalem, where he has an apartment, preparing to head to a closed-door court hearing as early as today, sources said.

The 75-year-old was earlier questioned about the alleged scheme almost immediately after arriving in the country for Passover, and he implicated Olmert, sources have said.

It was unclear what the alleged payments to Olmert were for, but sources said they involved hefty amounts of cash.

Talansky repeatedly appears - sometimes under the nickname “The Laundry Man” - in the logs of financial dealings kept by Olmert’s longtime aide, Shula Zakan, a source said.

Olmert was grilled by investigators Friday. He has vehemently denied any wrongdoing.

Let’s see: A botched war against a terror outfit, an approval rating in the single digits, a reputation as spineless but arrogant. Olmert’s outlasted every good reason for a resignation so far. I wander what happens next.

1 Comments — Leave your comment

May 6, 2008 | 12:24 pm

Messianic Jew causes boycott call from Bible Quiz

Posted by Brad A. Greenberg

And you thought Jeopardy! was dramatic:

A group of religious Zionist rabbis have called for a boycott of this year’s International Bible Quiz after discovering that one of the four finalists from Israel is a Messianic Jew who believes Jesus is the true Messiah.

“Messianics are missionaries who proselytize in very sophisticated ways,” said Rabbi Shlomo Aviner, one of the rabbis calling to boycott the quiz.

“It is forbidden to give them legitimacy by allowing them to take part in the quiz.”

Other rabbis that have called to boycott the quiz include Shmuel Eliyahu, chief rabbi of Safed, Ya’acov Yosef, son of Shas mentor Rabbi Ovadia Yosef and Rabbi Tzvi Tau, head of Har Hamor Yeshiva.

The call to boycott the quiz came after Yad L’Achim, a haredi anti-missionary organization, discovered that one of the finalists, Bat-El Levi, an 11th grader from a high school in Pisgat Ze’ev, was a Messianic Jew.

Levi won this year’s national bible quiz for state schools and will be one of four finalists from Israel competing for the International Bible Quiz Championship on Independence Day.

The Education Ministry said in response to a query from The Jerusalem Post that the “Global Bible Quiz for Jewish Youth” was open only to Jewish pupils. Regarding Messianic Jews, the pupil in question was Jewish, and therefore, according to the ministry’s legal department, was not disqualified from participating.

That is an interesting argument made by the Education Ministry, because my understanding has been that most Jews consider Messianics to be Christians, not Jews. Messianics, generally, consider themselves to be Jews who believe in the divinity of and salvation offered by Yeshua; I’ve attended a few services and rarely heard the words “Jesus,” “Christ,” or “Christian.”

Read more of this post

6 Comments — Leave your comment