September 11, 2007 | 7:08 am
M.J. Rosenberg, director of policy analysis at the Israel Policy Forum, penned a piece last week that asks people to not be so knee-jerk about ”The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy,” whose authors argue, Rosenberg wrote, that the pro-Israel community’s advocacy is not always in the best interest of Israel or the United States.
I spent almost 20 years as a Congressional aide and can testify from repeated personal experience that Senators and House Members are under constant pressure to support status quo policies on Israel. It is no accident that Members of Congress compete over who can place more conditions on aid to the Palestinians, who will be first to denounce the Saudi peace plan, and who will win the right to be the primary sponsor of the next pointless Palestinian-bashing resolution. Nor is it an accident that there is never a serious Congressional debate about policy toward Israel and the Palestinians. Moreover, every President knows that any serious effort to push for an Israeli-Palestinian agreement based on compromise by both sides will produce loud (sometimes hysterical) opposition from the Hill.
Walt and Mearsheimer mostly limit themselves to exploring whether all this is good for the United States (and to a lesser extent, Israel). The question I ask today, and not for the first time, is whether this type of behavior is good for Israel. Forty years after the Six Day War, the occupation continues, the resistance to it intensifies, and Israelis in increasing numbers question whether they have a future in the Jewish state.
Has “pro-Israel” advocacy consistently produced “pro-Israel” ends? At several critical moments, it most certainly has not.
Read those occasions here.
There have, of course, been plenty who disagree with the possibility that Walt and Mearsheimer are philo-Semitic, constructively critical observers. But Rosenberg makes an important point, the same one actually that legendary muckraker Seymour Hersh made when I interviewed him for a piece that will run in The Jewish Journal next week.
“This government and that relationship is really profound,” Hersh said, “and it is just very secret between us and Israel. It is not transparent, and that is not healthy for anybody.”
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in 0 Comments — Leave your comment
We welcome your feedback.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
academia america american jews anti-semitism atheism barack obama books capitalism catholicism christianity crime entertainment europe evangelicals family god holidays holocaust iran iraq islam israel jesus jihad john mccain judaism los angeles media middle east personal politics president 08 president bush president 08 sarah palin satire science sexuality sports the law
Advertisement
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
God's Blog
God for President
Book Bits
Caption Contest
Jewish genius
Strange science
Who is a Jew?
World of Worship
Advertisements
VideoJew Jay Firestone is back with the second 'volume' in his VideoGuide to L.A. This week -- driving around town
Parshat Ha'azinu (Deuteronomy 32:1-32:52) It isn't nice to say, but if I were hanging out in the desert with my friends -- all excited about moving in to a land of milk, honey and great falafel -- and an old man with a stutter insisted on "speaking into our ears" a weird doom