| |||||||||
January 7, 2009 | 12:47 pm
Posted by Tom Tugend
The victims of Bernard L. Madoff’s fraud includes no small number of boldface names and institutional investors.
There are Hollywood moguls Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg, financiers Fred Wilpon and Henry Kaufman, and actors Kevin Bacon and Kyra Sedgwick.
Then there were banks like HSBC and Banco Santander, and nonprofit groups including Yeshiva University and the Robert I. Lappin Charitable Foundation.
But a number of average-Joe investors have discovered that they, too, had money invested with Madoff. Their retirement funds, family trusts, and other savings usually found its way to Madoff through “feeder” funds, some of which were run by friends, acquaintances, or financial advisers.
Since they were not direct investors with Madoff, their status in recovering any money is uncertain. But there is no doubt that they, too, are victims of what appears to be the greatest Ponzi scheme in history.
Here’s my story:
In 1992, when I was 67 years old, I unexpectedly found myself with some extra cash on hand. During the preceding half century, I had served in three wars, earned a master’s degree, married, bought and paid off a house, and put three daughters through college.
I had started my fulltime working life in 1950 as a copyboy and later reporter on the San Francisco Chronicle and then, for over 30 years, was simultaneously a science writer at UCLA and a freelance journalist. My wife, Rachel, had worked full or part-time during much of that period.
We had bought a hillside house in suburban Los Angeles in 1968 and were close to paying off our mortgage.
Our two older daughters had married, were working and raising their own families, and our youngest child was independent, and likely to marry in the near future.
As a family, we were always quite disciplined about the household budget. As a matter of principle, we never got into debt and we paid off our credit card balances in full every month.
I wasn’t exactly a tightwad, we traveled frequently overseas, but, as my daughters like to remind me, when they were kids and scrawled drawings, I made them use BOTH sides of a blank sheet.
So in 1992, Rachel and I found ourselves with an extra $25,000 in the bank and decided to invest it, but knew enough to know that we knew nothing about the market.
So we turned to a trusted friend, whom we shall call Phil, who was our sometime lawyer and a fellow volunteer in local political campaigns. Phil had many years of successful investment experience, and although $25,000 was pretty small potatoes in his league, we insisted that we wanted into the game.
Thus I became one of some 99 limited partners in Caroline Investment Co. Phil told me that the partnership had consistently returned 15 percent to 16 percent a year, sometimes as much as 20 percent, and added that he had millions of his own money in the fund.
But he warned me that even he, with decades of experience, had no idea how the partnership managed to generate such high and steady returns.
Phil sent me a 73-page document, which I never read closely until after I learned about my link to Bernard Madoff. In the papers, I have learned that Caroline was a limited partner in the Lambeth Fund, operated entirely by Beverly Hills investor and arbitrage maven Stanley Chais, whom Phil had known for many years.
Chais, in turn, passed on the funds in Lambeth, Caroline and other partnerships to an unnamed brokerage and investment firm in New York. That firm, we learned since, was Madoff Investments; Chais had known Bernie Madoff for decades, but the name never appeared in any papers and was unknown to Phil.
For years, this opacity didn’t matter. Like most small-time amateur investors, with a full work and family life, I had happily watched as my stake steadily grew. Even with 25 percent of the profits going to Chais and 5 percent to Phil for their administrative work, I averaged an annual net return of 10 percent to 14 percent.
This compounded rapidly, since I didn’t need the income to make ends meet. Since my investment was in the form of an I.R.A. account, I didn’t have to withdraw money until I was 70½ years old and started receiving mandatory minimum distributions.
I had about $150,000 accumulated in Caroline on Dec. 11, when I received an e-mail from Phil, which started, “I have some terrible news for us.”
The shocking news, of course, was that Madoff had been arrested for fraud and that the many millions Phil and his daughter, a successful Los Angeles restaurateur, had been wiped out, as had Chais’ Lambeth Co.—and my $150,000.
Sure the loss hurts, and with the simultaneous devaluation of our house, we have dropped plans to move into an upscale retirement community.
On the upside, our mortgage is paid off, I still earn money as a journalist, and I get Social Security. Although my retirement-savings plan with the University of California is sinking like a stone, I’m pretty confident that my wife and I will not go hungry.
I take some irrational satisfaction from the thought that, for the first time in my life, I’m in the company of so many millionaires and billionaires, and we are all going down together on the same financial Titanic.
The real losers, I’m afraid, will be the families of my three daughters, and my eight grandchildren, to whom I will now leave a rather meager monetary inheritance.
This report was initially published on Portfolio.com, the Web site of Conde Nast Portfolio Magazine
11.10.09 at 9:36 am | It’s time for another Madoff auction, and this . . .
10.22.09 at 8:55 am | Is Madoff a Jewish Tony . . .
10.16.09 at 8:32 am | . . .
10.13.09 at 8:48 am | Madoff gets in prison . . .
10.13.09 at 8:38 am | . . .
8.12.09 at 3:24 pm | Bernie didn’t just screw his . . .
12.21.08 at 1:20 pm | Haters are having a field day, but not . . . (68)
12.17.08 at 3:51 pm | The tribalism of Hollywood means Jews go down . . . (45)
10.22.09 at 8:55 am | Is Madoff a Jewish Tony . . . (37)
We welcome your feedback.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
madoff jewish prison bernard ponzi money victim bernie thief fraud debate jew butner jail bernie madoff bail aei holocaust maddof auction swindlers list bruce friedman thursday sec arrives defraud fleece jacket bernie madoff's secretary spills his secrets dlg comedy central sentence memorabilia swindler friedman charitable foundation bernie madoff fight cramer convicted villaraigosa tony shalhoub elie
November 2009
October 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
Advertisements
If I were in your shoes, I would be fit to be tied too, but I think the better part of my mind would hold on to the reality that your problems as a human being, the things that keep you from greater closeness with your wife, kids, even grandkids, are, as they are for all of us, not financial.
The story is incomplete without Mr. Tugend informing the readers of two additional facts: (1) what was the value of the account when he began taking the minimum mandatory distributions at age 70 1/2? and (2) how much in minimum mandatory distributions did he actually receive over the course of the past 12 or 13 years. (If Mr. Tugend was 67 in 1992. He would have turned 70 in 1995 and would have had to take his distributions in the year he turned 70 1/2 which would have been either 1995 if he was born in the first half of the year or 1996 if born in the second half) Assuming that Mr. Tugend received at least $2000 per year, he has had a complete return of his principal. However, since the most recent amount before the fraud was exposed, showed he had $150,000, I suspect the amount he was receiving as minimum mandatory withdrawals greatly exceeded $2000 and may have been greater than the interest earned which was at least $15,000 and could have been as high as $21,000 per year, plus a reduction of the principal. These figures will allow the reader to assess any loss that Mr. Tugend incurred.
Dear Sir:
I am sorry for your blind trust and eventual loss of your hard earned income. I would suggest you contact an attorney and follow not only the prosecution of Bernie but the investigations of his family involvement. His brother and sons held director or higher positions with this firm. I am an industry professional, hedge fund manager, options specialist with 20 years experience.
Theone thing I am 100% certain of is this guy Did NOT and could NOT have perpetrated this crime without assistance. This family, in my opinion; were all directly involved and knowing the end was near, have developed a plan to put all the blame on the leader, to allow the family to limit numbers sent to jail and keep the loot.
All monies this family took out of these businesses for the past 10-20 years should be viewed as illegal, receipt of stolen property. Additionally, any money used to defend them with high priced lawyers should be viewed as money recieved as stolen property..
I am outraged at the lack of outrage…
God bless you
Michael
As I read this story, it sounds like Mr. Tugend is out only $25k (his original investment), not $150k as he claims.
If you buy a house for $500k dollars, it increases in value to $1.5 million, but then the market falls and you sell it for what you originally paid, $500k, did you lose $1 million. I think not.
If Tom had put the $25k into the S&P 500 Index Fund in 1992, it would be worth about $50k today. So worst case scenario he is out $50k, again not $150k.
There are two basic questions you have to ask yourself are how much risk you can tolerate, and how liquid you need your assets to be.Usually young people can tolerate a lot risk. If you’re saving for your retirement (which could be 35 years off) its ok if you have one bad year of returns on your investments, as long as you average a good return. But if you’re saving up for something specific in the short term, like law school or a house, you really want to be sure that you’re going to get a steady return over the next few years.