I used to worry about encountering a mud puddle, anxious that he might try to put his coat over it and encourage me to walk on it, resulting in an extremely well-intentioned disaster for both me and the coat. He also insisted on walking between me and the curb, because he said that was the tradition in days of old, to protect the woman from the dangers of the road.
"But what if someone comes at me from the other side and pulls me into an alley?" I wondered. (We're not together anymore.)
I'm a pretty big sucker for romantic gestures, but there's something so antiquated about a level of consideration that puts the "court" back in courtesy. I'm all for courtesy. If someone wants to hold the door for me, bevakasha (please). I hold doors for many people -- men and women -- in the course of a given day, and I'm pretty sure I'm not dating most of them. If "all the people of Israel are responsible for one other," then why wouldn't we treat each other with respect, regardless of our marital status and with or without chivalry?
According to Wikipedia (the modern writer's research tool, indispensable despite questions as to its accuracy) chivalry is "related to the medieval institution of knighthood ... usually associated with ideals of knightly virtues, honor and courtly love." Originally from the French (chevalier: one who rides a horse), today, chivalrous is "used to describe courteous behavior, especially that of men towards women."
Today's chivalry, if it exists at all, would have to be very different in action, if not in principle, from its medieval progenitor. One JDatersAnonymous.com reader said that for her, chivalrous behavior would consist of "asking for a woman's number and calling her."
She related that she had e-mailed someone on JDate, who responded with "I'm not a computer person, you call me."
She found this e-mail "disturbing."
"Whatever happened to chivalry?" she asked. "Whatever happened to the man asking for the woman's phone number and calling her? I find that JDate and other online sites are killing romance and chivalry."
While I might find it personally inconvenient (or even annoying) when someone claims to "not be a computer person" in today's technology age, I understand that not everyone prefers the same mode of communication. Some people are not "phone people," but they get over it because they have to in order to communicate. If the profile interested her and if she felt comfortable, I advised her to be a little more forgiving. If it was so important to her that he make the first call, she should offer her number. Or she could tell him that she's more comfortable handing out her number after a few e-mail exchanges. That reframing still indicates her interest, but also conveys that she'd like him to initiate communication.
Another reader went on a date with someone who did not pick her up and didn't offer to buy her a beverage or anything to eat. To her, chivalry was simply "when the male picks the female up and walks her home. It means she feels cared for. It means she is offered a bite to eat [does not need to be expensive] or at least a drink."
If chivalry is dead, it's because of a conspiracy -- with shots coming from the men in the book depository and the women on the grassy knoll and maybe some communist sympathizers -- rather than a lone gunman. We wonder how today's more equal social and economic ladder between men and women changes the rules of courtship. Some women are uncomfortable with chivalry, while others expect it. Men never know what's expected of them. And everyone's confused.
Maybe chivalry is not about holding a single door open or paying a dinner check. It's about being made to feel like someone would ride a horse to get to you, and then treat you with respect even above the normal level they'd show a stranger, transforming your relationship with that person to a different level, one that's more special -- a love for the ages and a courtship of connection.
Courtesy The Jewish Week.