| |||||||||
June 30, 2009 | 6:42 pm
Posted by Rob Eshman

Julius Genachowski
The new head of the FCC is a smart Jewish boy.
How smart is Julius Genachowski?
According to his Wikipedia bio:
Genachowski grew up in Great Neck, New York and received his B.A. in history in 1985 magna cum laude, from Columbia College, Columbia University, where he was an editor of the Columbia Daily Spectator. He received his J.D. in 1991 from Harvard Law School, where he was a notes editor at the Harvard Law Review[2] when it was headed by Barack Obama, who graduated in the same year. After graduating from Harvard, also magna cum laude, Genachowski clerked for the Honorable Abner J. Mikva on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, and then at the U.S. Supreme Court for two years, for Justices William J. Brennan and David Souter.
And how Jewish?
Again, from Wikipedia:
His parents are Eastern European Jews who survived the Holocaust.[9] His cousin, Menachem Genack, is an Orthodox rabbi and the CEO of the Orthodox Union Kosher Division.
Pretty funny that the media guy has the long and very Jew-y name, while the rabbi has the short, Anglicized name.
I’m impressed with the man’s experience:
Genachowski was Chief of Business Operations and a member of Barry Diller’s Office of the Chairman at IAC/InterActiveCorp. He had previously served on the Boards of Directors of Expedia, Hotels.com and Ticketmaster.[2]
He is a co-founder of LaunchBox Digital and Rock Creek Ventures.[3] He is also a special advisor at General Atlantic and a member of the Boards of Directors at The Motley Fool, Web.com, Mark Ecko Enterprises, and Beliefnet. He was appointed to the board of JackBe in April 2006.
Genachowski serves as a board member of Common Sense Media, a leading organization seeking to improve the media lives of children and families; and as an advisory board member of Environmental Entrepreneurs (E2). He also recently helped found the New Resource Bank, the country’s first commercial “green bank.”
He seems to understand new media, which I assume means he wants to create a media landscape that allows for a multiplicity of voices and points of view, and that expands, rather than shrinks, the promise of democracy.
In other words, I hope he treats the FCC with as much respect as Howard Stern always did.
Respect? Didn’t Howard spend hours trashing the FCC, insulting its chairmen, detailing its abuses and mistakes?
Yes. That’s not because he thought it was worthless—it’s because he believed in it, and was angry that it wasn’t living up to its potential.
People misunderstood Howard Stern’s fight against the FCC—and I’m speaking as someone who still plays tennis in a shtunky white T-shirt that says, “FREE STERN” on one side and “F the FCC” on the other.
Howard is not an anarchist—he’s a conservative. He saw the forces of the radical religious right tampering with America’s bedrock values of free speech and free enterprise, and it enraged him. The FCC’s battle against him outraged his sense of fairness. By trying to stop Howard from saying “vagina” on air—but not trying to stop the corporate takeover of the airwaves, or focusing on more important things—like the economy or war or the environment—the government was abdicating its true responsibilities. Decency? The word “vagina” is a lot more decent than 35 million people without health insurance.
It seems that President Obama’s new choice for FCC chair is a step in the right direction toward restoring decency where it has been most sorely missing—in government.
Here’s what Genachowski told his staff he will focus on, according to The Wrap:
“As the country’s expert agency on communications, it is our job to pursue this vision of a more connected America, focusing on the following goals:
Promoting universal broadband that’s robust, affordable and open.
Pursuing policies that promote job creation, competition, innovation and investment.
Protecting and empowering consumers and families.
Helping deliver public safety communications networks with the best technology to serve our firefighters, police officers, and other first responders.
Advancing a vibrant media landscape, in these challenging times, that serves the public interest in the 21st century.
Seizing the opportunity for the United States to lead the world in mobile communications.
These are just some of the goals we will pursue in the days ahead.How we will work will be central to what we can achieve.
We will be fair.
We will be open and transparent.
Our policy decisions will be fact-based and data-driven.”
2.2.10 at 1:55 pm | . . .
1.28.10 at 3:54 pm | . . .
1.26.10 at 11:25 am | Another Stern Secret: . . .
1.11.10 at 1:23 pm | Howard Rule: Speak Your . . .
1.9.10 at 8:44 pm | . . .
1.7.10 at 7:31 am | . . .
7.7.09 at 4:29 pm | Howard Stern has mother issues…thank . . . (20)
1.11.10 at 1:23 pm | Howard Rule: Speak Your . . . (16)
6.26.09 at 12:33 pm | A spirited defense of Howard . . . (15)
We welcome your feedback.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
howard stern artie lang drugs mitch fatel jimmy carter tracy millman artie lange hospitalized jewish seagle steven seagel jewish artie lange howard stern howard stern keith ablow mitch fatel howard stern israel stern steve langford tmz hospitalized lawman steven seagal jewish john melendez artie lange sick sick keith ablow greg fitzsimmons jews millman suicide attempt artie lange suicide seagal steven seagal lawman howard stern stuttering john artie lange
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
I find it interesting that you mention the new head of the FCC in your blog, because I get a sneaking suspicion that Howard may be considering some sort of comeback to terrestrial radio. Lately he mentions how “if” he was to come back to terrestrial radio he would retain his crown in a second. A point which is all too true. It’s just getting very close to the end of his contract and he smells the blood in the water and the potential for a double whammy on both satellite and terrestrial. I just don’t see him retiring at the end of this contract, there’s too much at stake for Sirius if he were to quit. Maybe Sirius could buy terrestrial stations in key markets, clean the show up, and make beau coup dollars.
Like you, I’m very curious what Howard will do, but unlike you, I don’t know enough to even begin to speculate. This is how little I understand the radio business: I bought Sirius stock at $6.00/share. Only someone blind to the realities of the industry would have done that.
I do know Howard keeps saying he would never go back to TR, so if he does he would certainly have a lot of backpedaling and explaining to do with his listeners.
At the same time, I do see Sirius and Apple cutting deals, broadband going into more and more homes, people launching their own programs out of their basements and getting people to pay for podcasts, even as the quality of Howard’s advertisers goes from mattresses to Mangroomers to penis enlarging pills. That’s not a reflection on Howard’s quality, which is as high or higher than ever, but on the realities of media ad sales these days (something I do, alas, know about, as we are entirely funded through ads). I think there’s still a lot of creative outlets Howard can tap to reach his audience with or without Sirius, and I have no doubt he’s thinking through them…..
My thoughts and sympathy go out to you for buying the stock at $6.00. Just to let you know, you’re doing a really good job with this blog. I had heard them talking about this on the show, but it was my wife who doesn’t even listen to the show who got me to read this. Keep up the good work.
I enjoy the blog and love the show, but I can’t believe you called Howard a conservative. Although he has an ocassional conservative opinion, he is very liberal, from his support of Hillary and Obama, to his beliefs on abortion, gay rights, etc.