November 20, 2013
Why Israel Failed on Iran
If negotiations in Geneva produce an agreement between the international community and Iran, it will not be an agreement Israel supports. It will be an agreement that most Israelis – government officials as well as citizens – believe will get Iran closer to achieving its goal. It will be an agreement that will get Israel closer to failing to achieving its goal.
Every discussion of a possible Israeli failure should begin by making a distinction between two types of failures. The current failure: the failure to convince the world (namely, the US) not to sign a deal with Iran; and the possible future failure – not yet set in stone – to ultimately halt Iran’s military nuclear program.
Let’s begin with the ultimate goal, the one shared by the US and Israel: stopping Iran from becoming a nuclear military power. Has Israel already failed? According to its own admission, failure has become more likely in recent weeks. Israel claims that the proposed deal with Iran is bad, that such a deal will embolden Tehran, weaken the force of the sanctions and hurt the effort to curb the Iranian nuclear program. Yet, failure isn’t yet a fait accompli. Why?
1. Because Israel might be wrong – namely, it might still discover that its grim assessment of A. the deal, or B. Iran’s true intentions, was erroneous this time.
If the deal is not as bad as Israel believes it is, it will lead to more negotiations, and to a final deal in which Iran will accept reality and dismantle its military nuclear program. Or it can lead to another crisis in negotiations followed by even more determined international action against Iran.
If Israel is wrong about Iran – the new and more moderate Iran presented to the world in recent months – the deal will surely work.
2. Because even if Israel is right, the world might discover it soon enough to correct its course. This can happen for many reasons, chief of which is an Iranian miscalculation of America's intentions.
3. Because Israel might still have the ability to act against Iran on its own. Naturally, the climate for taking such action is far from ideal, and questions about Israel's military abilities keep casting doubt on the seriousness of Israeli leaders’ threats to take action. Nevertheless, if Israel has the ability to act, and if its leaders believe that the result of action – as troublesome as it might be – is still preferable to doing nothing, they might just act. In such case, measuring success, or failure, would have to wait.
So the discussion about Israeli failure should really focus on its failure to persuade the rest of the world not to sign the deal it believes to be bad. For this too there are three possible reasons:
Why bother with this tiresome breakdown of Israel’s policies in recent years? This has merit because – as we’ve already said – the failure thus far isn’t necessarily the end of the story. Iran still hasn’t acquired a nuclear bomb, and assessing Israel’s options for the road ahead requires understanding the true reasons for its lack of success in pursuing the current course.
JewishJournal.com is produced by TRIBE Media Corp., a non-profit media company whose mission is to inform, connect and enlighten community