Quantcast

Jewish Journal

 

Netanyahu’s approval rating: The decline continues

by Shmuel Rosner

August 22, 2012 | 10:42 am

Benjamin Netanyahu (Photo: Reuters)

It has not been a good summer for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It began with something close to euphoria, as the coalition was broadened to include the Kadima Party and reach a near-record 94 ‎mandates. But the coalition did not exactly thrive: Kadima was forced out when agreement on the ‎draft of Haredi men could not be reached – not exactly what the public wanted. And other ‎issues also started to erode Netanyahu’s previous support. While the social protest movement wasn’t ‎able to accomplish something that even remotely reminiscent to last year’s successes, the ‎government made life harder for itself by imposing necessary but never popular austerity measures ‎on the public. Taxes are going up, services are being cut. The public – already fearful of the ‎consequences of possible armed conflict with Iran – can be forgiven for its lack of confidence. As you ‎can see in our Netanyahu Approval tracker, the result is a continued decline in Netanyahu’s numbers. ‎He now barely clears 30% approval - not long ago he was above 50%.‎

Take a look at Prof. Camil Fuchs’ graph (this graph is an ‎exclusive J Meter feature), followed by some ‎more comments: ‎

Photo

‎1.‎ An election is not what Netanyahu wants right now. Considering his low approval numbers, and the closing gap between the ‎right and left wing blocs (you can see the blocs and the analysis in our often-updated Poll Trend tracker), ‎Netanyahu has every reason – and the votes – to dismiss any thoughts of election until another, better time. This ‎is ironic if one considers the fact that elections would have been held in about two weeks, had Netanyahu not pulled ‎from his hat the last minute agreement with Kadima leader Shaul Mofaz.

‎2.‎ Mofaz wanted the agreement because he needed time to get organized and try to recover politically. In a ‎sense, he got what he wanted: the immediate elections were postponed and the threat of looming elections was much ‎lessened. But the recovery of his image is another story. One of the only comforting aspects for Netanyahu of having such a low ‎approval rating is that no other leader comes close to be able to challenge him ‎for the top job at this time.‎

‎3.‎ I’m one of those who thinks that any decision on Iran will not be greatly influenced by the approval ratings of the prime ‎minister. For one, because I’m not enough of a cynic to think that a decision of such magnitude will be ‎determined by the PM’s popularity at any given moment. But also because I really don’t think popularity matters on this issue. Netanyahu is a politician, and I never expect politicians not to think about the politics of every ‎decision they make. But as a skilled politician, Netanyahu knows that the politics on Iran will be simple: if the ‎public considers action to be successful, the prime minister gains. If action is deemed unsuccessful, he loses. Since ‎Netanyahu isn’t going to launch an operation if he doesn’t see an opening for success, he doesn’t have to think ‎much about politics when he ponders Iran.‎

 

How the ranking is determined

• The index is primarily based on published polls from four media ‎sources: Dialog-Haaretz, the Panels Institute, Channel 10 television ‎and the Dahaf Institute. It will be updated regularly at Rosner’s ‎Domain; we will add relevant polls from other sources as we go ‎along.‎
• The wording of the relevant question in the Dialog-Haaretz and ‎Channel 10 polls was, “Do you approve or disapprove of Benjamin ‎Netanyahu’s performance as prime minister?” (the literal translation ‎from the Hebrew version is “satisfied” and “not satisfied,” rather ‎than “approve” and “disapprove”).‎
• The Panel Institute polls asked respondents to grade the prime ‎minister’s performance on a scale of 1 to 10. The Dahaf polls asked ‎respondents to evaluate the prime minister’s performance using five ‎categories: very good, good, mediocre, bad and very bad.‎
• The two linear regression models were fitted to the Panels and the ‎Dahaf polls’ data, with the response variable being the proportions of ‎the dichotomous variable with the categories “approve” and “disapprove.”‎‎

The data plotted here contains a combination of results from both individual polls and from averages of several polls as follows

    • Whenever the time lapsed between two polls is substantial, the plotted data contains the results from the individual polls. The poll date is marked on the horizontal axis.
    • When several polls all were conducted within a relatively short period of time, the plotted data contains the average of the results of the polls conducted within that time period. The dates of the first and the last polls in the relevant period are marked as intervals on the horizontal axis

 

More from the J Meter

Obama’s foreign policy approval

Obama’s overall approval rating

Polls: An attack on Iran?

Projection: Jewish members of the House

Projection: Jewish members of the Senate

The Israel Factor

Israel Favorability

Tracker Pixel for Entry

COMMENTS

We welcome your feedback.

Privacy Policy

Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.

Terms of Service

JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.

Publication

JewishJournal.com reserves the right to use your comment in our weekly print publication.