Jewish Journal


May 30, 2012

by Shmuel Rosner

May 30, 2012 | 2:59 am

Iranian technicians at the Fordo enrichment plant (Photo: Reuters)

Computer Viruses Won’t Stop Iran

Cyber attacks such as Stuxnet or the newly uncovered Flame virus will only delay the inevitable ‎diplomatic breakthrough or military action on Iran’s nuclear program, writes ‎Jonathan Tobin in Commentary Magazine. ‎

‎[N]o one should be fooled into thinking a virus will ultimately stop Iran’s ‎nuclear program if the regime is determined to persist in its goal. Any ‎technological attack will spawn a defense and a counter-attack. Though ‎Flame may give Israel and/or the West a temporary advantage in the cyber ‎war being conducted with Iran, it cannot by itself or even in combination ‎with other covert activities such as assassinations, solve the problem. ‎

Will Iran Retaliate for the Latest Cyberassault?‎

The Iranian regime is learning from its enemies and could be planning an ‎assault of its own, writes Babak Dehghanpisheh in Time.  ‎

The Iranian government has long anticipated this digital conflict and has tried to ‎assess both external and internal threats. As part of its readiness for this kind of ‎conflict, Tehran has reportedly spent $1 billion to boost its cyber-defense and offense ‎capabilities in recent months. That has included the purchase of sophisticated ‎monitoring software from ZTE, a Chinese telecom company, as well as filling the ‎ranks of the Iranian Cyber Army with tens of thousands of recruits, according to ‎some officials. The Cyber Army is believed to be linked to the Revolutionary Guard.

When Israel had a champion at the UN

Writing in the Jerusalem Post, Peter Collier pays tribute Reagan’s UN envoy Jeane ‎Kirkpatrick, a great friend of Israel who battled the institutionalized anti-Israel ‎sentiment.‎
‎ ‎

Kirkpatrick defended Israel by her unyielding critique of what it faced at the UN. ‎Charging that diplomacy regarding the “Arab- Israeli conflict” at the world body “has ‎nothing to do with peace, but is quite simply a continuation of war against Israel by other ‎means,” she said that the UN, as a result, had become a place where “moral outrage was ‎distributed like violence in a protection racket”; a place where Israel is regularly and ‎routinely attacked for manufactured crimes amidst deafening silence “when 3 million ‎Cambodians died in Pol Pot’s murderous utopia… when a quarter million Ugandans died ‎at the hands of Idi Amin… and when thousand [sic] of Soviet citizens are denied equal ‎rights, equal protection of the law; denied the right to think, write, publish, work freely or ‎emigrate.”‎

Arabs search for stable political systems

Rami G. Khouri of the Daily Star compares the responses of four governments of the ‎Arab world to their peoples’ demands for reform. ‎

Four countries in particular – Syria, Jordan, Egypt and Lebanon – capture the ‎different ways that Arab societies have responded to demands for change. None ‎of them has been perfect. The two extremes of political evolution are Syria and ‎Jordan. In Syria, the state and some of the smaller armed opposition groups use ‎extreme violence against civilians, while the majority of opposition supporters ‎demonstrate peacefully for a change of regime. No progress is possible on a ‎dialogue-based reform program because there is no trust between the ‎government and opposition, and international intervention via the United ‎Nations or other means is unable to forge a successful political reform process.

Time for U.S. leadership ‎on Syria

The editorial board of the Washington Post calls on President Obama to end his ‎procrastination on the spiraling violence in Syria.

The reality is that the killing in Syria will continue, and the threat to vital U.S. ‎interests across the Middle East will grow, until Mr. Obama stops counting on the ‎likes of Kofi Annan and Vladimir Putin to spare him from the responsibility that ‎should be shouldered by a U.S. president. The longer he waits, the greater the ‎cost — in children’s lives, among other things. ‎

Where the Arab Spring Began

Michael J. Totten of the World Affairs Journal visits Tunisia, where people have opinions ‎on everything from Israel to Stalin.

Tunisia is moderate and even liberal compared with other Arabic-speaking ‎countries, but the place still suffers from a heady case of Israel ‎Derangement Syndrome. More than half the people I interviewed ‎complained about Israel at least once even when I didn’t ask about it. Not a ‎single one of these people - not a one - based their complaint in reality. They ‎were jousting with a fantasy Israel that only exists in their minds. ‎


Tracker Pixel for Entry


We welcome your feedback.

Privacy Policy
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.

Terms of Service
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.

JewishJournal.com reserves the right to use your comment in our weekly print publication.


The Israel Factor