September 12, 2012 | 7:33 am
One of Israel's finest music hits of recent years was Alma Zohar's Indian Love Song, in which an Israeli woman gets a call from her faraway lover. "Mi amore, it's Miguel, I'm calling you in Israel just to say that I love you", Zohar sings (part Hebrew, part English – listen here). Yesterday, I was reminded of this song as I first heard about the Obama-Netanyahu phone conversation. Following a week of rhetorical friendly fire – Netanyahu demanding "red lines" on Iran, the US publicly rejecting such demand – the two leaders needed this call just to say that they love… well, that there's "no rift".
However, as I wrote (before the call was made) for this publication's print edition, the past week was not an easy one in US-Israel relations. Netanyahu seems to have climbed high up the tree and the administration seems reluctant to hand him a ladder – in fact, it seems to want to publicly humiliate him. Here's one paragraph from my article – which you are welcome to read it in full here:
When Clinton declares diplomacy to be the best option, Israeli officials hear the sound of perpetual delay that will lead to a bitter end. What Israeli decision makers are faced with, as the Obama administration so blatantly says no to military action, is an even starker choice: to trust an administration in which it has no trust, or to wait for an administration in which it might have some more trust (namely, for Mitt Romney to win the 2012 election), or to act promptly to defy the expectations that the Obama administration so manifestly aligned itself with.
Netanyahu was somewhat misleading when he angrily demanded of “those in the international community who refuse to put red lines in front of Iran” to understand that such position takes away their “moral right to put a red light in front of Israel.” Because what the Obama team was doing in the past week was not putting a red light in front of Israel — it was holding a red handkerchief in its face, to dare the bull to take action or be silenced. And one should just hope that war with Iran doesn’t start over issues of hurt egos. And one should just hope that the pressure on Iran will not be reduced over egos.
5.21.13 at 1:32 pm | What is Israel's real position on Assad? Why. . .
5.21.13 at 3:11 am | We bring you a daily round-up of the interesting. . .
5.20.13 at 3:26 am | Headlines & Reads: Kerry Begins ME Visit, Lapid. . .
5.19.13 at 7:55 am | The election race for Chief Rabbi is Israeli. . .
5.19.13 at 5:22 am | Headlines & Reads: Syria Prepared to Fire at Tel. . .
5.17.13 at 5:29 am | Another episode of our series of weekly video. . .
5.17.13 at 3:28 am | Headlines & Reads: Mass Ultra-Orthodox Protests. . . (586)
5.14.13 at 5:15 am | Shavuot is a great time to think about. . . (470)
5.19.13 at 7:55 am | The election race for Chief Rabbi is Israeli. . . (198)
We welcome your feedback.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com reserves the right to use your comment in our weekly print publication.
Jewish Ideas Daily
NY Jewish Week
Public Policy Polling
Sabato’s Crystal Ball
The Cook Report
The Jewish Channel
The Jewish Forward
The Monkey Cage
The Washington Institute for NE Policy
Walter Russell Mead