October 1, 2013
What the $%#@ is happening?
I’m writing this 17 minutes after the Federal government shut down — for the first time in 17 years. I remember clearly the last time this happened. It was stupid and superfluous and self-destructive then. It’s stupid, superfluous and self-destructive now.
The Tea Partier Republicans set this in motion — they actually planned its implementation months ago. You can go online and hear them at rallies back in the Spring promising to close down Washington, D.C. “Shut it down!” their audiences chanted back.
More mainstream Republican leaders went along with the demands of the far right. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor and Speaker John Boehner knew it wouldn’t work, knew it was dumb, knew Cruz and his ilk will likely hurt Republicans in the next election cycle — but went along.
If only they were the only victims.
Prior to zero hour, the Jewish Council for Public Affairs circulated a letter on Capital Hill calling on lawmakers to support a federal budget agreement and avoid a government shutdown
“Spending cuts should not unfairly target the most vulnerable among us,” Jared Feldman, JCPA’s vice president and Washington director, wrote. “We urge you to strengthen anti-poverty efforts and restore opportunities for all Americans. It is critical that Congress come together cooperatively and civilly in this effort. Regardless of the outcome, a cantankerous and divisive process is unacceptable.”
The shutdown will hurt thousands of furloughed Federal workers. It will disrupt numerous services, including research at the National Institute of Health, and it will likely suspend the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children, which provides food, health care referrals and nutrition education for pregnant women, new mothers and their children.
Because, you know, those heart disease researchers and low-income children are sucking this country dry.
[David Suissa: We should shut down the hysterics]
The shut down, which Tea Partiers and their enablers are promoting as a fiscally responsible way to thwart the implementation of Obamacare, will actually end up costing a couple billion dollars, not to mention a few points on the Dow. If it continues for too long, the nation’s entire economy could backslide.
And if that’s not bad enough, the whole debacle may actually pay off for the people who cooked it up.
In recent polls, Sen. Ted Cruz shot ahead of his potential 2016 Presidential contenders. Because of his Seussian 23-hour speech denouncing a funding bill the President could sign, Cruz “now has more credibility with the GOP base than the folks who have been leading the party for years,” according to outsidethebeltway.com.
This would all make sense if, at the end of this nightmare, Cruz would stare into our eyes, and say, like Walter White in “Breaking Bad” did to Skyler: “I did it for me!” At least that would be honest. But like Walt’s alter ego, Heisenberg, Cruz has convinced himself he’s leading this charge for the greater good. Seriously, even in “Breaking Bad” the meth dealers respected the Feds.
It may sound petty, given the enormity of this debacle, to point out here that a Republican Party taken over by anti-government nihilists can kiss winning the Jewish vote goodbye. Granted, it’s a small vote, but it comes with the added benefits of activism, donations and a couple of swing states.
Why do I say that? Because Jews, it turns out, like good government. Stable government in democratic nations have enabled them to prosper and practice their faith freely. Effective, accountable government protects minority rights and property and creates the conditions for prosperity, including investment in and support of those less fortunate—which turns out to be good for all.
I’m assuming Eric Cantor, who is Jewish, knows this, which is why at press conferences he looks like a kid being dragged in front of the principal.
It’s why — little known fact — the Republican President who garnered the largest percentage of the Jewish vote in the modern era was Dwight D. Eisenhower.
Yes, he was a bit dull and unconscionably complacent on civil rights, but consider his achievements, as Stephen Ambrose enumerates them in his biography: Instead of dismantling the New Deal, as more strident Republicans wanted, the number of people receiving Social Security benefits doubled under Eisenhower’s administration. He balanced the budget, froze military spending and refused to lower taxes. He kept New Deal regulatory commissions in place. Public works expenditures exceeded those of Truman or FDR—projects that included the Interstate Highway System and the St. Lawrence Seaway. He refused to sell off public lands or open wilderness areas to mineral development. He stopped nuclear testing in the atmosphere. He avoided all military entanglements.
“The United States never lost a soldier or a foot of ground in my administration,” Eisenhower said. “We kept the peace. People asked how it happened. By God, it didn’t just happen, I’ll tell you that.”
All that investment, all that government — and Eisenhower presided over the greatest decade of American prosperity in the twentieth century.
In 1956, Eisenhower received 40 percent of the Jewish vote—a number that hasn’t been topped since. Even more telling, he campaigned and got that vote while delivering to Israel a series of punishing measures and blistering statements in response to its collusion with Britain and France in the Suez Campaign.
Call it ancient history. Call it a distant fantasy. But if Republicans want to come close to that accomplishment, it’s not the government they need to shut down, but Ted Cruz.