|
|

Advertisement
November 30, 2011 | 6:30 pm
Posted by Rabbi Shmuley Boteach
| Tweet |
I have watched with mild amusement as the debate surrounding the beliefs of Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman have gained steam. Aren’t the Mormons weird fanatics? Should we trust people who have such strange beliefs with high office?
This is an interesting question coming from my Evangelical brothers and sisters, whose belief that a man, born of a virgin, was the son of God, only to die on a cross, and then be resurrected — a belief that is, with all due respect, not exactly the most rational belief either. It is equally interesting coming from Orthodox Jews, like myself, who believe that the Red Sea split, a donkey talked to Balaam, and the sun stood still for Joshua.
But it is equally strange coming from evolutionists like Richard Dawkins who have said, without a single shred of evidence, that life on our planet may have been seeded by space aliens. Even those evolutionists who reject Dawkins’ faith in extraterrestrial life have a belief system of their own, namely, that intelligent life somehow evolved capriciously and accidentally from inorganic matter, even though the possibility of complex organisms evolving without guidance is mathematically nearly impossible. This is how Julian Huxley, who stemmed from the world’s most famous family of evolutionary proponents, put the probability of the evolution of a horse: “A proportion of favorable mutations of one in a thousand does not sound like much, but is probably generous … and a total of a million mutational steps sounds a great deal, but is probably an understatement. ... With this proportion, we should clearly have to breed a million strains (a thousand squared) to get one containing two favorable mutations, and so on, up to a thousand to the millionth power to get one containing a million. … No one would bet on anything so improbable happening … And yet it has happened!” Yes, even men of science can believe things that can be construed as highly irrational.
Now, do I believe that Joseph Smith found ancient tablets written in reformed Egyptian in upstate New York, that Jesus Christ appeared to the people of South America as recorded in the Book of Mormon, or that when a Mormon dies he becomes a god and gets his own planet? No. Respectfully, I do not. Nor should it matter. It is what a person does, rather than what he believes, that counts. It took four years for the Dalai Lama to be identified as the reincarnation of his predecessor in a process that to Western eyes can appear highly arbitrary. Yet, the Dalai Lama remains one of the most respected men alive because of his commitment to world peace and good works.
Misguided attacks on groups like the Mormons stem from a willful desire on the part of many to fraudulently identify people with a different faith system as fanatics and, therefore, a brief discussion of religious fundamentalism is in order.
The most confusing story of the Bible involves God’s commandment to Abraham to sacrifice his son, Isaac. What was the God who would later declare that all human — and especially child — sacrifice to be an abomination, thinking?
The most insightful commentary I have seen on this story comes from the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, who says that the key to the story is to see Isaac not as an individual but as a religion. Who was Isaac? He was Judaism. He was the person who would continue Abraham’s belief system. With his death, everything that Abraham had taught in terms of his rejection of paganism and the belief in one God would be lost.
The test, therefore, was this: Would Abraham follow God’s commandment to kill off his religion or would he put his religion before God’s will? What really mattered to Abraham? God or Judaism? And if they were to be put in conflict, what would he choose? The religious fanatic is the man or woman who has ceased to serve God and has begun worshipping his or her religion, making that faith into yet another false idol. Religion is solely the means by which we come to have a relationship with our Creator. But when it becomes a substitute for God, it becomes soulless and fanatical, seeing as there is no loving deity to temper it. It is in this light that we can understand why an Islamic fundamentalist is so deadly: In order to strike a blow for the glory, not of the deity, but of Islam, he is even prepared to go against God’s express commandment not to murder.
Hence, our concern need not be with a person’s faith in public office. It does not matter if he or she is Jewish, Evangelical, Mormon or Muslim. What does matter is whether the person’s faith is focused on relating to God and, by extension, caring for God’s children, or whether that person sees the purpose of his or her high station to promote a particular religion. It is easy to identify the difference. People who are in a relationship with God are humble and do their utmost to refrain from judging others. Their proximity to a perfect being reminds them of their own fallibility. Their experience of God’s compassion leads them to be merciful and loving. But those who worship a religion are arrogant and think they have the only truth. They are dismissive of other people’s beliefs and maintain that advancing the cause of their religion is more important than life itself. The rabbi in Israel who recently made the strange comment that soldiers should face a firing squad rather than listen to a woman sing is a classic example of this heresy.
Those who worship their religion evince the classic characteristic of cult members. Whereas a real faith system is empowering and makes one strong and capable of operating outside one’s own faith community, cult members can only identify with other members of their group and require the environment of the cult in order to function. They don’t have beliefs. Rather, they take orders.
I see none of these characteristics in Mitt Romney or Jon Huntsman — who graciously hosted me along with my guest, Elie Wiesel, in the governor’s mansion in Utah a few years back — or any of my countless other Mormon friends. All should be judged on their merits as people and politicians, whatever their faith and whatever their beliefs.

5.1.12 at 9:38 am | I had already twice hosted Benjamin Netanyahu –. . .

4.19.12 at 1:56 pm | Last week I held a press conference at The. . .

4.19.12 at 1:49 pm | When I lived in England I got used to my British. . .

4.4.12 at 12:58 pm | No greater tragedy can befall parents than having. . .
3.19.12 at 12:43 pm | Hamid Karzai recently called the brave and. . .

3.5.12 at 11:54 am | B’nai Brith Canada is an organization whose. . .

2.24.12 at 10:28 am | I came on to Michael Coren’s TV show in Canada. . . (20)

2.23.12 at 1:54 pm | Today I had what was probably the most unpleasant. . . (17)

2.28.12 at 10:41 am | My much-publicized dispute with Canadian TV host. . . (14)





We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
rabbi shmuley rabbi shmuley boteach israel storyblog opinion bloghome religion rabbi shmuley boteac kosher jesus nation anthony weiner politics twitter shmuley boteach shmuley world rabbi shmuley michael coren michael coren eric cantor jesus benjamin netanyahu war obama mormon christianity marriage shmuley rabbi judaism pope pius xii republican palestine jewish president netanyahu barack obama new york britain jews and christians church rabbi shmuley on sun
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
| |||||||||
God continue to bless you for this wisdom that you have shared and for your open heart to see good in others!
—-You make me happy that there is even just the legend that the grandmother of my father (I’m 63), who we have not been able to trace farther back, was of Jewish descent. Shalom!!
A voice of wisdom and prudence. Thank you many times over.
Thank you, Rabbi Shmuley, for your message of tolerance and understanding.
Much of the “weirdness” of Mormonism is attributable, of course, not to what we actually believe, but to misrepresentation of our beliefs, as is also shamefully characteristic of Antisemitism.
So surely you meant to point out that “when a Mormon dies he becomes a god and gets his own planet” is actually just such a canard. It is simply not that simple! Joseph Smith said, “It is not all to be comprehended in this world; it will be a great work to learn our salvation and exaltation even beyond the grave.” http://bit.ly/vIDhL3
Tracy Hall Jr
hthalljr’gmail’com
Not to belabor the point, but we don’t claim to know where in the Western Hemisphere the resurrected Christ appeared to the Nephites. Many scholars favor Central America.
To encourage religious literacy and understanding, I recommend any of the interesting, accurate, erudite, non-proselyting writings of two respected, observant LDS scholars, Richard Bushman and Terryl Givens. Oxford’s “Very Short Introduction” series includes Book of Mormon (RB), and Mormonism (TG.) For greater depth: “By the Hand of Mormon: The American Scripture that Launched a New World Religion” (Oxford, TG) and “Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling” (Knopf: RB).
Tracy Hall Jr
hthalljr’gmail’com
Correction: Switch the authors of Oxford’s “Very Short Introduction” series. (Mormonism: RB; Book of Mormon: TG)
such a beautiful and insightful piece. thank you!
Thank you for your beautiful article. If everyone had such an unbiased, tolerant and unjudgemental opinion of various belief systems, this world would not be filled with such prejudice and hatred. I remember your interview(s) with Doug Wright on KSL TV in Utah some years ago, and how impressed he was with you and I myself wanting to read more of your writings. And yes, I am a Mormon! Thanks, and keep up the good work!
Josie Neville
What’s underneath the magic Mormon underwear? - Exposed http://www.squidoo.com/mormon-church
In answer to Mr. Widemouth:
“What’s underneath the magic Mormon underwear?”
Our bare skin.—Just kidding!
It is actally symbolic and sacred. We wear this after making covenants with the Lord in the temple as an outward sign of commitment to Him. It all stems back to O.T. times, if you are at all familiar with that. As example, when the priests of Aaron wore certain symbolic clothing, etc. as they also had the “law of circumcision” for instance, as an outward symbol of commitment to God and to live his commentmands.
Josie Neville
Sorry for the typo in the word “actually!”
Josie Neville
Thank you, Rabbi, for your thoughtful article—especially your insight on the Islam extremist view of murder. Very enlightening. Now, if one reads the Book of Mormon, rather than relying on uninformed statements about it, one would find more clarity and less confusion. For example, God never intended that Abraham would kill Isaac. It was an object lesson. That’s why He provided a ram in the thicket. This was deeply symbolic, which is the whole point of what God was teaching Abraham. You will find the meaning of God’s lesson to Abraham in Jacob 4:4,5 in the Book of Mormon.