October 19, 2006
Trailer for 'Suicide Killers.' Click on the big arrow to play.
The first person I met at the Liberty Film Festival preview was a riled up Asian American man with a pompadour, who quickly explained to me what was wrong with Hollywood: It is a vast liberal conspiracy.
"But the founders of the studios were conservative," I said, thinking of the Goldwyns, the Warners and the Mayers.
"Yes," he said. "But their children are communists."
The Liberty Film Festival, now in its third year, aims to present and promote the work of conservative filmmakers who, according to the organizers, are ignored, persecuted and otherwise absent from "Hollywood."
I put Hollywood in quotes because its meaning, as the evening at the Luxe Bel Air Hotel wore on, was elusive.
The Festival, said Mike Finch, executive director of the David Horowitz Freedom Center that sponsored the event, "is a voice for sanity. [Hollywood's] not just for the far left. All these viewpoints deserve to be heard in Hollywood."
For him, Hollywood seemed to mean Westsiders who work in the entertainment industry and read the Huffington Post.
"It's really important that we have films going out with the conservative viewpoint," said actress Govindini Murty, who organized the festival with her husband Jason Apuzzo. "Because Hollywood is making a major effort on the left to undermine the war on terror."
For her, Hollywood seemed to mean documentary filmmaker Michael Moore. But Moore himself railed against "Hollywood" when Disney refused to release his controversial documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11." A bit later, Murty referred to "Hollywood's" love of documentaries "that undermine the military. They are all extremely radical, very anti-Israeli."
Here she had me stumped. This clearly wasn't the Hollywood of "Saving Private Ryan" and "The Marine," which opened this week. And I couldn't think of any anti-Israel Hollywood films. Which made me think that for Murty, "Hollywood" means anyone who won't make movies she likes, or, perhaps, that she's in.
This is the festival's third year, and it has grown substantially since its founding, last year attracting some 3,500 viewers. This year's event will be held Nov. 10-12 at the Pacific Design Center in West Hollywood.
About 100 people gathered at last week's preview to meet the organizers and get a taste of the 28 films on offer.
If the trailers are telling, I suspect there will be a lot of documentaries and some uneven features with a kind of look-ma-I-have-an-Apple quality. There will be some violence -- I saw terrorist body parts splattered in something resembling POM -- but no sex or nudity. At Liberty, "conservative" means Christian, and Christian means Family Research Council.
The most promising documentary appears to be "Suicide Killers," by the Algerian-born Israeli filmmaker Pierre Rehov. The Arabic-speaking Rehov infiltrated a terrorist cell to provide a firsthand look at the people who perpetrate such inhuman crimes.
But the night's preview was less about these movies and more about why "Hollywood" would never want to make them.
It took me a beat -- as they say in Hollywood -- but eventually I realized where I'd heard that same complaint: from liberals in Hollywood, from Asians in Hollywood and Latinos in Hollywood. From screenwriters and actors and union members and women and newcomers and old-timers in Hollywood. Heck, I'd even heard it from Jews in Hollywood.
Because here's the truth: Hollywood doesn't make anybody's film.
Zillions of people dream of making a movie. But the studios only release a couple of dozen each year.
Chances are excellent your film -- whether it's about a Chinese lesbian dockworker who stands up to a right-wing corporate conspiracy, or about a blogger from Duluth who brings down a left-wing Washington conspiracy -- isn't going to be one of them.
The five top-grossing films of 2005 were "Star Wars-Episode III," "The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe," "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire," "The War of the Worlds" and "King Kong." There's not a political plotline in the bunch -- unless you count Narnia's Christian polemic.
Hollywood's primary, overriding focus is on making movies that do big box office. That explains how this week, Paramount Studios tapped Oliver Stone, the bane of the Michael Medved School of Wholesome Cinema, and Cyrus Nawasteh, whom Clintonites despise for writing "The Path to 9/11" to make a movie version of "Jawbreaker," about the CIA in Afghanistan. Ideology, shmideology -- go make us a hit.
But none of this realmovietik puts conservative tushies in the Liberty Festival seats, so Murty and the other speakers resort to victimhood and conspiracy. Several speakers referred to left-wing Jewish billionaire investor George Soros' reported interest in buying the 59-film library of Dreamworks. "Soros has taken over the Democratic Party," said Finch, "and is now making a major play to take over Hollywood. But [Murty and Apuzzo] are gonna beat George Soros."
Since when is buying the DVD rights to "Gladiator" "taking over Hollywood"?
All these ill-defined, overheated intimations of evil Hollywood are where the Liberty folks lose me. They begin to join thematic forces with the Internet cuckoos, for whom "Hollywood" means only one thing: the Jews. For centuries Jews were kept outside society's gates. But in the industry they created and in which they are still heavily represented, Jews are often the gatekeepers. And though the Liberty folks stand with Israel and against anti-Semitism, their antagonism toward an amorphous, conspiratorial "Hollywood" has a discomfiting resonance.
The conservatives at Liberty should ease up on the rhetoric. The twin gods of Hollywood are talent and a track record. If you have those, you're in, no matter how repellent your ideology, or your actions. Just ask Mel Gibson.