November 6, 2009 | 3:10 pm
Posted by Albert Fuchs, M.D.
Last week I lamented that we can prevent so few cancers. Cervical cancer screening is one of the success stories of prevention. Regular pap smears can drastically decrease the risk of cervical cancer and makes death from cervical cancer virtually unheard of.
Cervical cancer is a sexually transmitted disease, caused by human pappilomavirus (HPV). Pap smears check for telltale changes in the cervix that happen after HPV infection. Over many years these changes lead to cervical cancer.
But while potentially life-saving for some women, other women can not benefit from pap smears and should not have them. A study in this issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine interviewed physicians about the kinds of patients to whom they would recommend pap smears and found that many doctors perform pap smears on women for whom it is not helpful.
Below is a summary of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for pap smears. More details are available by following the links below.
Like all good things, the benefit is derived from judicious use. Even though in other women the test is crucial, performing pap tests on women who can not benefit from it is just bad medicine. It falsely reassures women that they are taking care of themselves. It wastes patients’ time and scarce resources. And it ultimately decreases physician credibility.
Wall Street Journal Health Blog: Who Should Get a Pap Smear?
Annals of Internal Medicine article: Specialty Differences in Primary Care Physician Reports of Papanicolaou Test Screening Practices: A National Survey, 2006 to 2007
Important legal mumbo jumbo:
Anything you read on the web should be used to supplement, not replace, your doctor’s advice. Anything that I write is no exception. I’m a doctor, but I’m not your doctor despite the fact that you read or comment on my posts. Leaving a comment on a post is a wonderful way to enter into a discussion with other readers, but I will not respond to comments (just because of time constraints).
We welcome your feedback.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com reserves the right to use your comment in our weekly print publication.
11.22.13 at 8:45 am | Why vaccines still matter even in developed. . .
11.15.13 at 1:55 pm | A revolutionary shift in deciding whom to treat.
11.8.13 at 8:32 am | The first cases of polio in over 14 years. . .
10.25.13 at 1:04 pm | Hydrocodone combination medications will be more. . .
10.18.13 at 2:03 pm | Concierge doctors and the future of American. . .
10.4.13 at 1:29 pm | A new study finds difficulty thinking even a year. . .
2.4.11 at 10:59 am | The FDA recently issued a warning about. . . (1214)
3.15.13 at 10:38 am | The FDA warns about a popular antibiotic. (44)
4.26.13 at 4:53 pm | A bird flu strain gets the attention of public. . . (26)