|
|
|
Advertisement
Nation
December 11, 2011
Gingrich sticks by Palestinian comment, draws rebukes from GOP candidates
| Tweet | Share |
|
Republican presidential candidate former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA) makes a point during the Republican Party presidential candidates debate at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa on Dec. 10. Photo by REUTERS/Jeff Haynes
Republican presidential front-runner Newt Gingrich stood by his assertion that the Palestinians are an “invented people,” drawing criticism from other GOP candidates.
“Is what I said factually correct? Yes. Is it historically true? Yes,” Gingrich said during a GOP debate Saturday night in Iowa. “We are in a situation where every day rockets are fired into Israel while the United States—the current administration—tries to pressure the Israelis into a peace process.”
“Somebody ought to have the courage to tell the truth,” he continued. “These people are terrorists, they teach terrorism in their schools.”
Gingrich added that “it’s fundamentally the time for somebody to have the guts to say enough lying about the Middle East.”
He first made the “invented people” comment in an exclusive interview with The Jewish Channel.
In response to Gingrich’s comments at the debate, U.S. Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) said, “That’s just stirring up trouble.”
Many prominent Jewish Republicans view Paul as an isolationist whose opposition to tough anti-Iran actions and foreign aid, including for Israel, would be bad for the Jewish state. But Gingrich also drew criticism from GOP candidates with records of strong support for Israel.
Mitt Romney, who stands first or second in most polls, said he agreed with Gingrich’s comments about Palestinian terrorism, but said the former House speaker went too far in publicly questioning Palestinian peoplehood.
“I happen to agree with most of what the speaker said,” Romney responded. “Except by going and saying that the Palestinians are an invented people. That I think was a mistake on the speaker’s part.”
Romney warned against throwing “incendiary words into a place which is a boiling pot”—and that doing so could make things harder for Israel.
Another candidate with strong pro-Israel credentials, Rick Santorum, followed Romney’s comments with similar criticism of Gingrich.
In recent days, Gingrich’s campaign issued a statement stressing that despite his comments on Palestinian peoplehood, he still favors the eventual creation of a Palestinian state. The statement, released by spokesman R.C. Hammond, declares that “Newt Gingrich supports a negotiated peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians, which will necessarily include agreement between Israel and the Palestinians over the borders of a Palestinian state.”
Hammond added, “However, to understand what is being proposed and negotiated, you have to understand decades of complex history, which is exactly what Gingrich was referencing during the recent interview with The Jewish Channel.”
Gingrich’s comment has been criticized in even stronger terms by an assortment of Palestinian spokesmen and liberal commentators.
Post your comment below!
Tags and Sharing
Tags
Share This Story
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
Discussion
We welcome your feedback. Please share your views and insight in The Jewish Journal Reader Forums.
Privacy Policy
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
COMMENTS
We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.
Privacy Policy
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
Terms of Service
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
If only Jewish liberals would put the same intensity into being outraged over PA attempts to claim there is no Jewish connection to Jerusalem (or to the rest of Israel) then criticism of Newt Gingrich might be understandable.
Charles Krathhamer summarized it well: Newt is historically 100% correct. However, the current status is they exist with the feeling of peoplehood.
The dilemma is how you reach peace with a group that wants you destroyed and announces that any “agreement” is a temporary step toward your destruction.- Comment by LT COL HOWARD on 12/11/11 at 2:10 pm
What do Golda Meir, lifelong socialist and prime minister of Israel, and Newt Gingrich, lifelong conservative and current presidential candidate, have in common? The courage to tell the truth about ”Palestine”
Gingrich stirred up a hornet’s nest last week when he remarked that “The Palestinians are an invented people.” Golda made the same point when she told the London Sunday Times on June 15, 1969 that “There is no such thing as a Palestinian people”
What could have possessed the Prime Minister of Israel and the former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives to say such a thing?
Simple: an appreciation of history. Gingrich has a Ph.D. in the subject. Golda lived it.
- Comment by LT COL HOWARD on 12/11/11 at 9:52 pm
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
| ||
Site SectionsNewspaper
Serving a community of 600,000, The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles is the largest Jewish weekly outside New York City. Our award-winning paper reaches over 150,000 educated, involved and affluent readers each week. Subscribe here. © Copyright 2012 Tribe Media Corp. | ||
|
Interesting argument: though Newt is right about the Palestinians being an invented people (before ‘67) they were just fellow arabs ruled by jordan and egypt, should we actually say it? I guess if you believe in the truth you should.