|
|

Advertisement
August 13, 2010 | 6:36 am
Posted by Rabbi Hyim Shafner
| Tweet |
To be sure as Orthodox Jews we believe that God gave the Torah to be relevant for all times (yemot hamoshiach and the kashrut of bacon aside). Often it is argued that it can not be the case that something in nature has changed which would render something in the torah to no longer be true or observable. For instance, it is often pointed out in kiruv circles that the torah states that a pig is the only animal which has cloven hooves but does not chew its cud and since the Torah is true not only has another animal never been found with such criteria but one never will. From what I am told this is utilized as one of the many proofs of the Torah’s divine truth by many orthodox outreach organizations.
Another example: It is widely claimed in many segments of the Orthodox community that homosexuality must result from nurture and not nature. This is so, it is claimed, because God gave the torah for all times, so it must be the case that everyone can in theory marry someone of the opposite gender. Indeed the torah commands “Therefore shall a man leave his father and mother and cleave to his wife.” Since the Torah forbids homosexual acts and commands heterosexual marriage it must be the case that all Jews are able to be or at least act heterosexual with the right help.
Why is it then that kashrut organizations can forbid certain vegetables, telling us there is no way to check them for bugs and we do not bat an eye? Does not the torah tell us in Birashit that all the “growing things are for you to eat?” If the torah is applicable for all times and there is no way to check brussel sprouts for bugs why doesn’t this bother us theologically as much as claims for the genetic etiology of homosexuality? Is it perhaps that a culture has developed among us whereby when it comes to forbidding something we have no problem expanding the torah, but when it comes to finding ways to include and permit we do? Perhaps the case, as Rabbi J. Telushkin has said, “Though Hillel wins in the Talmud, it is Shami who wins in Jewish life today.”
2.9.12 at 1:16 pm | Though we are obligated to perform the mitzvoth. . .
2.7.12 at 2:12 pm | Let's bring sanity back into the room. . .

2.7.12 at 2:10 pm | American Jews, secular and religious alike, have. . .
2.7.12 at 11:46 am | Rabbi Zev Farber argues for the desexualizing of. . .
2.1.12 at 10:07 am | . . .
1.29.12 at 7:04 pm | One of the lessons from Bet Shemesh, and beyond. . .

2.7.12 at 2:10 pm | American Jews, secular and religious alike, have. . . (636)
2.9.12 at 1:16 pm | Though we are obligated to perform the mitzvoth. . . (182)
2.7.12 at 2:12 pm | Let's bring sanity back into the room. . . (122)
We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
obama storyblog netanyahu palestinian statehood counting of the omer tznius orthodox jewish osamabinladenkilled modern orthodoxy prayers modern orthodox religion jewish women chasidic aipac palestine passover orthodox judaism osama bin ladend dead orthodox jew fire modern orthodox rabbi victims judaism orthodoxy feminism brooklyn israel palestinian state days of my life tzniut omer orthodox jews osamabinladendead modesty los angels modern orthodox jews women orthodox women leiby kletzky
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
Contemporary Issues
Halacha (Jewish Law)
Jewish Thought
Meditation
Parshiot/Holidays
Prayer
Women and Judaism
Blogs
Bloggish-mobile
Foodaism-mobile
Hollywood Jew-mobile
Jews and Mormons-mobile
Keeping it Real-mobile
Keeping the Faith-mobile
Morethodoxy-mobile
Nice Jewish Doctor-mobile
Rosners Domain-mobile
Tattletales-mobile
The God Blog-mobile
The Ticket-moblie
Leisure-mobile
Multimedia-iPad
Photos-iPad
Videos-iPad
| |||||||||
The flaws in this essay are marvelous to behold.
> Since the Torah forbids homosexual acts and commands heterosexual marriage it must be the case that all Jews are able to be or at least act heterosexual with the right help.
If a Jew had a strong urge to eat pork or shellfish - not just a hankering but a really overwhelming internal demand - would that make it okay?
If the local mall had a really good sale on for one day this week - Saturday - and you really, really, really needed a new pair of shoes that would only be available then, would that make it okay?
While there is no doubt that the sexual drive is extremely strong in nature and that in homosexuals the idea of sex with a woman is completely unappealing, it is nevertheless the command of God that he marry a woman and procreate. Yes, he has a strong drive to have sex with other men. Does that make it okay?
> This is so, it is claimed, because God gave the torah for all times
The Torah nowhere discusses nature vs nurture in homosexuals. (Incidentally, the field of research is so poisoned by liberal politcal correctness that such a study could never be honestly done. Imagine the screams of “homophobia!” if it was determined that nurtuer is, in fact, a major factor) It simply says that bacon is forbidden and a man has to procreate with a woman. Done.
It’s one thing to feel sympathy for those who drives are pushing them in the wrong (not alternative) direction, quite another to think that the strength of those drives means the Torah doesn’t apply to them.