|
|

Advertisement
August 5, 2010 | 12:16 pm
Posted by Rav Yosef Kanefsky
| Tweet |
Just 48 hours ago, I posted a few thoughts about the recently-released Orthodox “Statement of Principles on the Place of Jews with a Homosexual Orientation in Our Community.” (Below, I have pasted that post’s central idea, as well as the link for the full text of the “Statement’”.) With yesterday’s court decision blocking Prop 8, I will append a thought about Orthodoxy and gay marriage.
Orthodox Judaism can never endorse or support gay marriage. Not only because there is a verse in the Torah which prohibits homosexual sex, but also because halacha has no category of marriage that involves the union of two people who are severely prohibited from engaging in a sexual relationship with one another. This is how central sexuality is to Halacha’s concept of the marital relationship.
Nonetheless, I was not a Prop 8 supporter back in November, and am relieved that it is headed toward being overturned. Jews as a group, and Orthodox Jews in particular continue to benefit from our country’s commitment to never allow any one group to impose its religious conceptions or laws upon anyone else. But Prop 8 recklessly ignores this commitment. The underlying flaw in the entire approach taken by Prop 8 proponents is their unwillingness to recognize that the term “marriage” is presently a civil legal term, and therefore must be protected from any religious group’s effort to superimpose a religious connotation upon it.
The simple and correct way to resolve the heated and explosive debate around gay marriage is to remove “marriage” from the purview of government altogether. Heterosexual and homosexual couples can be granted the identical set of legal rights and privileges, consistent with our commitments to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. And “marriage” would be left to the realm of religion, where it was born, where it truly belongs, and where each individual religious faith can make decisions for itself as to what it deems permissible or prohibited.
From the earlier post:
The recently released Statement of Principles concerning homosexuals within the Orthodox community has gotten a great deal of notice, both here and in Israel. (If you haven’t yet seen the text, it is here: http://statementofprinciplesnya.blogspot.com/ )
The document is historic in Orthodox terms, as it repeatedly acknowledges the very real possibility that homosexual orientation is genetically based and is not subject to change. While this is not really news to many people, its explicit articulation in a document authored by Orthodox rabbis is paradigm-shifting. The true deep cause of Orthodoxy’s decades-long unintelligible stammering about homosexuality is the conundrum presented by the possibility that God is responsible both for homosexual orientation and for prohibiting homosexual behavior. The inadmissibility of either of the possible solutions to the conundrum (that the Torah is not Divine, or that God is terribly unjust) left our community inchoate at best, or championing “change therapy” at worst. The current Statement of Principles offers no solution to the conundrum either. In Talmudic parlance, the question is left as a “teyku”. But the authors of the statement courageously decided that homosexuals should not have to daily pay the social price for our inability to solve the theological puzzle. This is a huge paradigm shift..
2.7.12 at 2:12 pm | Let's bring sanity back into the room. . .

2.7.12 at 2:10 pm | American Jews, secular and religious alike, have. . .
2.7.12 at 11:46 am | Rabbi Zev Farber argues for the desexualizing of. . .
2.1.12 at 10:07 am | . . .
1.29.12 at 7:04 pm | One of the lessons from Bet Shemesh, and beyond. . .
1.18.12 at 2:33 pm | It was suggested that I put the entire letter I. . .

2.7.12 at 2:10 pm | American Jews, secular and religious alike, have. . . (21)
2.7.12 at 2:12 pm | Let's bring sanity back into the room. . . (18)
2.7.12 at 11:46 am | Rabbi Zev Farber argues for the desexualizing of. . . (13)
We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
obama storyblog netanyahu palestinian statehood counting of the omer tznius orthodox jewish osamabinladenkilled modern orthodoxy prayers modern orthodox religion jewish women chasidic aipac palestine passover orthodox judaism osama bin ladend dead orthodox jew fire modern orthodox rabbi victims judaism orthodoxy feminism brooklyn israel palestinian state days of my life tzniut omer orthodox jews osamabinladendead modesty los angels modern orthodox jews women orthodox women leiby kletzky
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
Contemporary Issues
Halacha (Jewish Law)
Jewish Thought
Meditation
Parshiot/Holidays
Prayer
Women and Judaism
Blogs
Bloggish-mobile
Foodaism-mobile
Hollywood Jew-mobile
Jews and Mormons-mobile
Keeping it Real-mobile
Keeping the Faith-mobile
Morethodoxy-mobile
Nice Jewish Doctor-mobile
Rosners Domain-mobile
Tattletales-mobile
The God Blog-mobile
The Ticket-moblie
Leisure-mobile
Multimedia-iPad
Photos-iPad
Videos-iPad
| |||||||||
While I have no problem with a secular state creating a secular definition of marriage being that of any two people (although one wonders why two is now such a magic number and polygamists are still excluded?) the blocking of proposition 8 shows a far more worrisome trend - that of liberal judges who use their power to block the democratic wishes of the population. In typical fashion democracy only seems to work when the left’s idea are triumphant.
If Prop 8 had been a lefist motion and a conservative judge had blocked it, the same people cheering now would be screaming “obstruction of democracy!”