fbpx

Marty Kaplan: The senators who dissed baby Jesus

What’s the right word for what Sen. John Kyl (R-Ariz.) was doing when he attacked Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) for “disrespecting one of the two holiest holidays for Christians” by keeping Congress in session in the week before Christmas? What do you call it when Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) <a href=\"http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/12/16/DeMint-Crammed-agenda-sacrilegious/UPI-11821292517001/\" target=\"_hplink\">blasted Democrats as “sacrilegious” for wanting the Senate to take up an arms control treaty and a spending bill “right before… the most sacred holiday for Christians”?
[additional-authors]
December 20, 2010

What’s the right word for what Sen. John Kyl (R-Ariz.) was doing when he ” target=”_hplink”>blasted Democrats as “sacrilegious” for wanting the Senate to take up an arms control treaty and a spending bill “right before… the most sacred holiday for Christians”? 

Not “chutzpah.”  Chutzpah is Newt Gingrich and incoming House speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio.) hammering Democrats in 2010 for the effrontery of convening a lame-duck session of Congress, even though then lame-duck House speaker ” target=”_hplink”>they themselves had larded the appropriation with hundreds of millions of dollars of pork for their states.

“Extortion” isn’t quite it either.  Extortion is Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) ” target=”_hplink”>falsely warning that the DREAM Act will provide “safe harbor for any alien, including criminals”; will be “funded on the backs of hard-working, law-abiding Americans”; and will “give college preference to illegals over citizens.”  (I can’t decide whether Sen. John McCain’s (R-Ariz.) running away from the DREAM Act is demagoguery or opportunism.  Maybe both.)

“Obstructionism” comes close to the motive of Kyl and DeMint for camouflaging their partisanship as a battle in the war on Christmas.  But I’d reserve that word to describe the ruthless opposition of Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to passage of the 9/11 First Responders bill, and to anything else that President Obama could conceivably call a win.
 
There’s something “Orwellian” about labeling as sacrilegious the requirement that Congress work a regular week like other Americans fortunate enough to be employed, but I think the Ministry of Truth vibe emanates more purely from the four Republican members of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission who voted last week to ” target=”_hplink”>cry-baby confession that he forced the notorious 1995 shutdown of the federal government because Bill Clinton made him sit at the back of Air Force One. 

It feels to me like a critical mass is being reached.  In the same seven days that the sanctimony of Kyl and DeMint was ridiculed even by Republicans ” target=”_hplink”>Joe Scarborough, the reliably somnolent Capitol Hill press corps instead treated the Thune-Cornyn denunciation of earmarks as the cynical Tea Party-pandering stunt that it was.  In that same week, Media Matters published ” target=”_hplink”>another one instructing them to undermine evidence of global warming as junk science – a story actually reported by media that had grown used to yawning at Fox’s avid partisanship.  And also in that week, the Pulitzer Prize-winning Web site PolitiFact named “a government takeover of health care” as 2010’s “” target=”_hplink”>the most misinformed segment of the 2010 electorate—and both reports were covered, except on Fox, as facts.

Now maybe all these dots are outliers; perhaps they don’t really add up to a tipping point.  After all, this was the same week that CNN announced that it would produce the first 2012 Republican presidential primary debate in New Hampshire, and that it was “teaming up with the Tea Party Express for a first-of-its-kind presidential primary debate” in June 2011.  In the wake of those press releases, I didn’t notice anyone observing that the presidential primary debates of both political parties in 2007 and 2008 turned out to be pretty much colossal wastes of time for their audiences, who – though entertained by putative insights into candidates’ “character”—learned approximately nothing useful about the impending financial crisis, the war in Afghanistan and the rest of the problems that the next president would have to face.  It was also the same week that America learned that when he takes his dog on a South Lawn walk, President Obama himself scoops up Bo’s poop—a reminder (as if we needed one: Look! A tweet from Sarah Palin!) that the trivialization of public discourse in the age of show biz shows no signs of abating.

Even so, I’m sensing a tectonic shift.  Could it really be that politicians once invulnerable to being shamed are increasingly being held accountable for their bad behavior, and that some of the reliable ol’ boogeymen just ain’t what they used to be?  Maybe.  But don’t ask Boehner, and don’t tell McConnell.

Marty Kaplan is the Norman Lear professor of entertainment, media and society at the USC Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism.  Reach him at {encode=”martyk@jewishjournal.com” title=”martyk@jewishjournal.com”}. 

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

Latest Articles

Print Issue: Got College? | Mar 29, 2024

With the alarming rise in antisemitism across many college campuses, choosing where to apply has become more complicated for Jewish high school seniors. Some are even looking at Israel.

More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.