Marty Kaplan

November 22, 2010

I take Israel personally

By Marty Kaplan

Tweet

Share

I take Israel personally.

I also take Obama personally, and Jon Stewart, Paul Krugman and NPR. I take Trojan football personally. If I were more into baseball, I imagine I’d take the Dodgers personally, too.

What I mean by taking them personally is more than being a fan. I identify with them.  I have the feeling — the delusion, you might say — that I actually am them. When they do something great, I’m proud of me. If they screw up, I’m not let down by them, or ashamed of them; I’m down on me, as though I were the one who blew it.

My trip to Israel this month was my first since I graduated from college, during the Hoover administration. When the El Al security people interviewed me before letting me proceed to the check-in counter, I loved how crafty our — not their — profiling is. We don’t need to touch people’s junk or ogle their body scans; we X-ray their minds.

On the other hand, when Israel’s burgeoning Ultra-Orthodox population lives off the state’s largess, but doesn’t have to work, or serve in the armed forces, or pay taxes or even believe in the idea of Israel; when the Ultra-Orthodox rabbinate controls women’s behavior at the Western Wall and has a monopoly on marriage and conversion; when Jews like me are called “Reform goyim” and their congregations are denied decent land; when extreme religious parties have a veto over government policy, and extreme religious “outposts” flout the rule of law and sabotage negotiations — when this, and worse, happens, I feel the failures and outrages personally: Where did we (not they) go so wrong?

If I have any hope of getting out of this rumination alive, this is the point where I have to, leap to, declare my love and support for the existence of the Jewish state of Israel. I think the international campaign to delegitimize Israel is based on a malicious misreading of history, abetted by a level of naïveté, ignorance and racism that would surprise me if I hadn’t just lived through the past two years of media and politics. I reject the contention that Zionism is racism, colonialism or any other -ism designed to steal land, disenfranchise citizens or exterminate enemies. The 3,000-year-old artifacts of Jewish civilization that I saw in the Israel Museum and the Nazi Who-is-a-Jew? genealogical charts that I saw at Yad Vashem and the secular Israeli majority I saw in the streets and know from the Diaspora, reminded me that Israel’s nationhood derives from its existence as a people, not as a religion.

I actually came back from Israel more of a hawk than when I left. I am more respectful of the security fence — my security fence — than I was before. Yes, I know the case against it, but I’ve returned convinced that its designers are motivated by fighting terrorism, not by appropriating land or humiliating Palestinians. I haven’t concluded that a pre-emptive strike on Iran is a good idea, but I’m less inclined to think that the threat Iran poses is only a politically pumped-up neocon job. I no longer think that “settlements” is a useful, or necessarily pejorative, term; it encompasses too wide a variety and history of dwellings to be deployed as a shorthand for obstructionism. Like everything else in Israel, it’s complicated.

But don’t get me wrong: I’m closer to J Street than to AIPAC. When Netanyahu acts as though the status quo can go on indefinitely, I not only despair at his delusion; I wear it as my own albatross, whether I want to or not. When he catastrophically bungled the response to the Gaza flotilla stunt, I was unable to prevent myself from feeling personally soiled. When Israeli parents tell me that they don’t know their kids when they return from military service — when they describe what sounds like an epidemic of post-traumatic stress disorder — I feel as implicated as I do by my failure to spare our own Afghanistan veterans from the ravages of a war without end.

I went to Israel with a small group from my congregation, Temple Israel of Hollywood.  One afternoon, we went to Bethlehem, in the West Bank, to meet with the head of the leading Palestinian news service. What we heard from him embodied a theme that pervaded our trip: the idea that Israel is a battleground between two competing narratives. The Palestinian account of history, its assignment of right and wrong, is a mirror image of the Israeli version; just about everything is flipped.

No negotiation between Israelis and Palestinians can settle the matter of which narrative is right. No historian, journalist, political figure or international tribune can sort through the dueling accounts and create a composite that either side will accept. The closest I can imagine anyone coming to a resolution is an artist, whose talent is to embody irreconcilable truths. David Grossman’s harrowing novel, “To the End of the Land, “ which I read during the trip, makes emotional and aesthetic sense out of those contradictions, but unfortunately it’s a meaning that doesn’t help the people who have to draw land-swap maps and negotiate security forces. Tragedy isn’t much of a diplomatic tool.

It was 4 o’clock when we left Bethlehem. We got off our Palestinian bus at the border crossing to make our way on foot through Israeli security. At the same time, hundreds of Palestinian men were walking in the opposite direction, going home from their jobs in Israel. I was the first of our group to clear the final Israeli checkpoint, and I realized that to get to the Israeli bus waiting for us, I had no choice except to plunge into the crowd of waiting Palestinians. I saw wariness, and weariness, on their faces. There might have been hatred, too, but the sense of danger that ambushed me — despite my best efforts at empathy — made me avoid eye contact and move as fast as I could through the throng. I was the Other to them, and they were the Other to me. I cursed my involuntary anger. I took my fear, and my anguish, personally. You know what? I should.

Marty Kaplan holds the Norman Lear chair in entertainment, media and society at the USC Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism. He can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

---

Post your comment below!

Click here to return to the homepage.

COMMENTS

We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.

Privacy Policy

Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.

Terms of Service

JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.

Marty, this was a step in the right direction. Another trip, perhaps a longer stay, and you may finally get why most Israelis despise JStreet; who knows, you may even end up holding your nose while voting for Netanyahu.

Comment by Avi on 11/22/10 at 4:41 pm

Mart, Marty, Marty, it won’t help much if the lambs support vegetarianism as long as the wolves disagree. This is how Arab journalist Khaled Abu Toameh puts it: “I don’t care who is in government in Israel. There is a partner. And my partner is the Jewish people. Why? [Cont…]

Comment by Mini on 11/22/10 at 10:31 pm

Because a majority of Jews have already accepted a two-state solution. I see a majority of Jews who don’t care anymore about Gaza. I see a majority of Jews who want to disengage from the Palestinians. I see a majority of Jews over the last 15 years marching toward moderation and pragmatism. I don’t know today of one Jewish mother that wants to send her son back to the streets of Ramallah or Gaza. I don’t know of one Jew who wants to control the lives of the Palestinians and run their education and health system. Sadly though, while the Jewish public has been marching towards pragmatism and realism and moderation, on the Arab side the message remains no, no and no.” You dig?

Comment by Mini on 11/22/10 at 10:34 pm

As a non-Jew who has studied WWII and the Holocaust for 20+ years I also just came back from a visit to Israel. After Yad Vashem I was even more shocked to visit Bethlehem next day and find that the Wall has created exactly the same kind of ghettos and racial demonization that was seen under the Nazi Master Race. Israel has sadly become a fascist apartheid police state that is in the end unsustainable, much like Segregation was in the US and S Africa. It is perversely now a major cause of world terrorism through its cruel illegal occupation of Palestine. Time to tear down the Wall and solve reconciliation, one way or another.

Comment by Brian on 11/23/10 at 12:36 pm

Yes Avi, another trip and longer stay will be helpful in seeing that the facts on the ground and the current direction of the Netanyahu government work against a two-state solution and a secure future for our Jewish state.

Comment by oraneem on 11/24/10 at 2:01 pm

Mr. Brian, save me from your Christian preaching. It sends a chill through my Jewish spine. You know, the Jews in Europe did not claim Christians do not belong in Europe. They did not send them to blow themselves up in Churches. May be this has something to do with the wall?  You know Brian, unlike in the ghetto; this barrier meant to keep the murderers out, not to lock them in. But I doubt that you even care to understand.

Comment by Avi on 11/29/10 at 4:31 pm

And also, Mr. Brian, how about a word or two from you about the fate of the Christian community in Bethlehem which was decimated by those Palestinians? Has it ever occurred to you that if those Christians in Bethlehem and in Baghdad had a wall to protect them they could be saved?

Comment by Avi on 11/29/10 at 4:32 pm

Finally Mr. Brian, if Jews in Europe were treated with the same compassion as the Palestinians by the Nazis, we wouldn’t be talking about the Holocaust today… BTW, you and yours have colonized California, and look!!! There is a “wall” on the southern border!!! That should offend your Christian sensitivities.

Comment by Avi on 11/29/10 at 4:37 pm

Dear Oraneem, it is so sad that you are still falling for the same crap after this publicity of the Wikileaks this weekend. It provides endless documentation about how serious Israel is about the 2-state solution. Go do your homework instead of repeating pure lies about Netanyahu that are damaging the enite state of Israel.

Comment by Avi on 11/29/10 at 4:43 pm

I don’t usually respond to nasty hate-spewing nuts like Avi. His rants should be seen by a much wider audience to see what dangerous hate looks like. I am not a Christian (or any religion) and since my visit to Israel know that social-justice Israelis do not support the idea of imprisoning 4 million Palestinians in Wall ghettos forever. Israel’s population is 50% Arab and you see Jews and Arabs living together more or less peacefully. Seen Be’er Sheba or Nazareth? Israel has achieved huge progress in the last 60 years. The sick new extremist Wall militarism will undo much of this in years to come, I fear. Time for more enlightened leadership and less hate from the Avis of this world.

Comment by Brian on 12/01/10 at 6:47 pm

Brian, Brian, Brian. You have not addressed any of my points, instread you are labeling me a hate spewing-nut. It is an old Bolshevik technique: Silencing people by labeling them as “nuts”, then locking them up somewhere.  Now to you: It so peachy preaching morality from where you are in California where your kids are not at risk of being blasted to bits on the way to school by suicide bombers. So Brian, go pound sand.

Comment by Avi on 12/02/10 at 11:50 am

Now Brian, get a clue: Go meet farmers and ranchers in Galilee and the Negev and they will tell you about the “peaceful” coexistence with their Arab neighbors. They will tell you about hate, harassment, thievery of products, farm equipment and machinery, the robberies, the lawlessness and the crime. The tolerance that you saw is indeed a tribute to Israel’s tolerance. No other country in the world, including the USA would put up with this crap.

Comment by Avi on 12/02/10 at 11:54 am

Post a Comment

Name:
Email:

Type the word you see below:

Comment:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?