|
|

Advertisement
January 6, 2012 | 1:21 am
Posted by Mark Paredes
| Tweet |

Although the U.S. Constitution declares that the government can’t administer a religious test to presidential candidates, individuals are certainly free to judge politicians using whatever religious criteria they wish. One popular topic of discussion among Mormons in this election year is the extent to which the “anyone-but-Romney” sentiment expressed by Republican voters in the primaries is a manifestation of anti-Mormonism. While many conservatives can and do have legitimate doubts about Romney’s conservative credentials, I suspect that Mitt’s biggest liability in the eyes of many Evangelical/Baptist/Fundamentalist voters remains his religion.
I am often asked whether anti-Mormonism also exists in the Jewish community. It does, but not nearly to the same extent as in certain Christian communities. In addition, Jewish anti-Mormonism comes from a different place and is more understandable than Evangelical anti-Mormonism. If certain Evangelicals and Jews decide not to vote for a Mormon because of his faith, that’s fine. However, one needs to make a distinction here: anti-Mormon Evangelicals judge LDS beliefs, while anti-Mormon Jews judge the actions of the LDS Church.
A further distinction can be made on the Evangelical side. It’s not only the Mormon belief in additional scriptures, modern prophets, and a corporeal god (inter alia) that upsets Evangelicals: It’s the Mormon claim that these are authentic Christian beliefs that is heretical to them. According to Dr. Richard Land of the Southern Baptist Convention, if Mormons were to declare themselves to be members of a non-Christian Abrahamic religion, Evangelical opposition to the LDS Church would probably decrease. Of course, such a declaration would never be made by Latter-day Saints, and Dr. Land’s suggestion merely confirms that Evangelicals who won’t vote for LDS politicians generally have a problem with what Mormons believe, not with how they live their religion.
The exact opposite is true of Jews who harbor anti-Mormon sentiments. Jews, like Mormons, usually don’t care about the theology of politicians. In most American states, both Jews and Mormons have little expectation of seeing members of their communities elected to high public office on a regular basis. As a result, they tend to focus on the positions, values, and character of candidates. On the rare occasions when I hear a Jew express concern about Mormons, he always addresses one of three issues: missionary work, opposition to gay marriage, and the performance of LDS temple ordinances for the dead. All of these objections are based upon Mormon actions, not beliefs.
Given the intense persecution and proselytizing efforts directed at them throughout the centuries, Jews’ unease with the tens of thousands of Mormon missionaries serving worldwide is certainly understandable, even if those missionaries are not targeting Jews (or any other religious group, for that matter).
While I support the LDS Church’s public opposition to gay marriage, it does make efforts to reach out to liberal Jewish communities much more difficult. LDS-Jewish relations in Los Angeles haven’t been the same in the post-Proposition 8 era. Reform Jewish leaders issued some of the harshest denunciations of the LDS Church during and immediately after the Prop 8 campaign, the effects of which were keenly felt in their community. Again, it’s important to note that what set off these leaders was not LDS beliefs concerning traditional marriage per se, but the church’s actions on behalf of Prop 8. The same can be said of Orthodox Jews who worked with the LDS Church to support the initiative. They did so because they agreed with the church’s actions, not its theology.
Enough has already been written on LDS proxy ordinances for the dead. I for one am glad that the issue has been put to rest. Nevertheless, it bears repeating that it was the actions of Mormons, not their belief in modern temples, that became the cause of Jewish concern.
Anti-Mormonism is alive and well throughout the U.S., and will undoubtedly rear its ugly head against Mitt Romney if he should win the Republican nomination. I take comfort in the fact that few Jews will refuse to vote for a Mormon based on his theology, though they may well oppose Mormon candidates who fail to support gay marriage or abortion rights. In the end, it’s easier to accept criticism of your actions than of your most sacred beliefs.

5.22.12 at 12:50 am | Yesterday's ultra-Orthodox event in NY reveals an. . .

5.13.12 at 11:42 pm | Schechter's recent decision highlights. . .

5.7.12 at 8:33 am | Hebrew student Tom Irvine is dedicating years of. . .

5.5.12 at 11:57 pm | A proposal advocating tikkun olam for young Jews. . .

4.29.12 at 9:56 pm | Mormon support for Israel was on display today in. . .

4.22.12 at 11:07 pm | Religious bigotry and lack of respect for Judaism. . .

3.27.11 at 8:00 pm | The answer is no -- and yes. . . (226)

5.22.12 at 12:50 am | Yesterday's ultra-Orthodox event in NY reveals an. . . (195)

12.4.10 at 1:25 pm | An Amish Apology and Abraham's Promise. . . (106)






We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
bloghome mormons mormon mormonbaptism jews and mormons mormonism romney jewsandmormons mormon church mormon candidates jews romney mormon zoa rosen yeah samaké world ann romney proxy baptism florence aish hatorah boycott starbucks wedding anti-internet prop 8 overrulling mormon temple porn site gay marriage finding singles online pelé lds marriage ordination ceremonies messi lds gay rabbis football team conservative judaism dozier romney money mormons israel
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
Blogs
Bloggish-mobile
Foodaism-mobile
Hollywood Jew-mobile
Jews and Mormons-mobile
Keeping it Real-mobile
Keeping the Faith-mobile
Morethodoxy-mobile
Nice Jewish Doctor-mobile
Rosners Domain-mobile
Tattletales-mobile
The God Blog-mobile
The Ticket-moblie
Leisure-mobile
Multimedia-iPad
Photos-iPad
Videos-iPad
Passover Reader
| |||||||||
Mark: It is not so much that Mormons have a different theology than Baptists, it is that Mormons claim to be Christian. The Baptists actually claim that Mormons are being DISHONEST when we say we are Christians. That is a PERSONAL attack on the integrity of every Mormon. But the reason is clear: Baptist leaders don’t want their members to listen to Mormon missionaries. That theme—“Mormons lie”—is precisely why so many are prejudiced against Mitt Romney, and claim they cannot trust him when he says he is a conservative and pro-life. Baptist pastors are lying to their congregants.
The dislike of evangelicals and less frantic ‘Christians’ against ‘Mormons’ are caused by two factors: Envy of Mormon success in volunteerism, welfare services, elevating members in talents, personal accomplishment, education and giving [tithings, welfare services, offerings from fasting, etc.] Another reason of importance is ‘loss of ministerial income from loss of members’. The LDS church operates on non-paid cleric. How many priests and ministers would ‘stay’, if it were announced they no longer would receive a salary for preaching [The Bible condemns preaching for filthy lucre]. Envy and loss of income [from hundreds of thousands who join the LDS Church each year]. SR Murphy