|
|

Advertisement
January 19, 2010 | 9:35 pm
Posted by Danielle Berrin
| Tweet |

Mel Gibson took Ricky Gervais’s Golden Globe dig with a lot more aplomb than he displayed this morning on KTLA.
In an interview with reporter Sam Rubin about his upcoming film, “Edge of Darkness” Gibson got a little testy when Rubin referenced “what happened before”—aka Gibson’s 2006 drunken anti-Semitic tirade.
“Some people are gonna welcome you back and other people are gonna be like ‘He should never come back,’” Rubin said.
“Why?” Gibson deadpanned.
“Because of what happened before..”
“What happened before?”
“..the remarks that were attributed to you…”
“That were attributed to me, that I didn’t necessarily make,” Gibson said. Then he stumbled a bit. “I gather you have a dog in this fight?”
“Pardon me?”
“You have a dog in this fight? Or are you being impartial?” Gibson asked.
At which point a voice in the background groaned “okay” or something like that and Gibson concluded, “Well I’m back and I hope people will graciously accept me back.”
By “people” Gibson means all the people he continues to offend by denying he ever said anything offensive. Rubin, who was clearly taken aback during the conversation, said he wished he would have confronted Gibson head on. “As both a Jew and a human being, I was really offended by what he said in 2006; it never really seemed to me that he apologized,” Rubin told his colleagues at the anchor desk. He said he’s still “in conflict” over the issue and “should have told” Gibson.
Does Mel deserve to be absolved of his sins?
You be the judge:

2.5.12 at 11:10 am | The film is in fact the product of a Jewish. . .

1.25.12 at 7:38 pm | A voice and a vote in the halls of power is. . .
1.24.12 at 10:08 am | With commentary!. . .

1.20.12 at 11:52 am | The most high-profile female attorney in the. . .

1.19.12 at 5:00 pm | . . .

1.17.12 at 12:17 pm | Josh Malina should quit acting and finish this. . .

5.17.11 at 7:55 am | While Shriver seeks self-betterment,. . . (2716)

2.5.12 at 11:10 am | The film is in fact the product of a Jewish. . . (743)

1.20.12 at 11:52 am | The most high-profile female attorney in the. . . (617)



We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
hollywood jewish hollywood jew jewishjournal.com jewish journal celebrity arts storyblog israel actor sundance film actress life los angeles natalie portman community tv singer jews movie music tel aviv movies oscars fashion holy rollers director jesse eisenberg madonna marriage adam lambert politics sundance film festival entertainment jew joan rivers aaron sorkin daniel radcliffe oscar
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
Blogs
Bloggish-mobile
Foodaism-mobile
Hollywood Jew-mobile
Jews and Mormons-mobile
Keeping it Real-mobile
Keeping the Faith-mobile
Morethodoxy-mobile
Nice Jewish Doctor-mobile
Rosners Domain-mobile
Tattletales-mobile
The God Blog-mobile
The Ticket-moblie
Leisure-mobile
Multimedia-iPad
Photos-iPad
Videos-iPad
| |||||||||
The reason why Mel Gisbon said that is because he actualy never made any anitsemitic rant when he was arrested!
the lie was planted by officer Mee on behalf of Harvey Levi from TMZ who paid him largely to create a fake police report, stating that Mel Gisbon had said antimsemitic things.
T WAS ALL A LIE
THERE IS 2 POLICE REPORTS, A REAL ONE STILL AT THE POLICE STATION, AND A FAKE ONE THAT TMZ GOT FOR MONEY!
SO IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN THE TRUTH, THATS HARVEY THAT SHOULD APOLOGISE TO MEL GISBON, AND THE JEWISH COMMUNITY SHOULD BLAME HARVEY!
IT WAS A LIE, MEL NEVER SAID IT
THAT OFFICER ALSO WROTE IN THAT POLICE REPORT THAT MEL GIBSON HAD CALL AN OFFICER SUGAR TITS.
WELL THIS ONE WASNT TRUE EITHER.
THE FOLLOWING INVESTIGATION SHOWED THAT MEE HAD ALSO LIED ABOUT THAT ONE AND THAT IN FACT IT WAS OFFICER MEE HIMSELF THAT ALWAYS CALL OTHER FEMALE OFFICER FOR “SUGER TITS”
JURIDICALLY WHEN ONE WITNESS LIE IN PART OF THEIR TESTIMONY, THE ENTIRE TESTIMONY IS NON -CREDIBLE.
WHEN OFFICER MEE COULD LIE ABOUT THAT, THEN WHAT MAKE YOU THINK THAT HE DIDNT LIE ON THE PART WHEN THERE WAS NO WITNSSES AT ALL?
OF COURSE HE LIED!
BESIDFE TRY TO THINK IT THROUGH: HOW COME THERE IS 2 POICE REPORTS TO BEGIN WITH ?
AND HOW COME IN THAT SECOND ONE, THE SUPPOSED PARTS TO BE REMOVED ARE STILL VISIBLE?
ITS ALL A FAKE AND VERY BAD MADE TOO
OFFICER MEE WORK IN THAT STATION AND WROTE THE ORIGINAL POLICE REPORT, SO HE COULD EASILY HAVE ACCESS TO THE MATERIAL LIKE THE DUI BLANKET AND MAKE A FAKE REPORT FOR TMZ FOR MONEY, AND INCLUDDE IN IT SOME FAKE LINES..
ADD TO IT THE FACT THAT THE FILE ON MEL GISBON WAS ON MEE’S DESK AND YOU’VE GOT IT ALL.
PEOPLE GET SO TAKEN BY THE SCANDAL-STEAM AT THAT TIME, AND ALL THE FRENZIC THAT NOBDOY THOUGHT OF THE MOST OBVIOUS: HARVEY LEVI, DIRECTOR OF TMZ WAS GOING DOWN,HIS ONLNE THING WAS NOT WORKING, HE HAD NO SCOOP AT ALL, AND WAS GOING TO HAVE TO CLOSE HIS BUSINESS. AND TMZ REPUTATION WAS VERY LOW. IT WAS FAMOUS FOR HAVING ALL ITS FACTS WRONG, AND FOR ITS STORIES TO BE FAKE. HE DESPERATLY NEEDED A SCOOP.
THEN MEL GIBSON GET ARRESTED, AND HE SAW A CHANCE TO GET THE SCOOP THAT COULD SAVE HIS SHOP. AND THATS WHAT HAPPEN.
AND TO THE DAY TODAY, TMZ STILL LIVE ON THE FAKE SCOOP THEY MADE ON MEL GIBSON!
SHAME ON THEM!
HARVEY CLEARLY TOLD SO IN DECEMBER LAST YEAR, IN AN INTERVIEW.
YOU DIDNT HEARD IT??
THE TRUTH—What is wrong with you?
To Danielle Berrin, you make a lot of unjustified assumptions. Mel Gibson was accused of a number of unsavory things the night he was arrested for DUI. He has admitted to some things (the anti-Semitic slurs) and denied others (sexist comments to a female officer). Why do you assume that he was complaining here about falsely attributed anti-Semitic remarks? Mel Gibson’s unwillingness to rehash an old embarrassing episode that he has already discussed in multiple interviews is not a new denial of wrongdoing. It is time to move on.
I am afraid that you do not understadn at all what Mel Gibson was saying.
he has keep his mouth shut and obey to waht his Pr representent told him to do for years now but its wenough he is standing up on his feet and ti was also about time!
you dont get it do you?
he was forced to apologise back then because the pressure was too strogn form the public and hollywood.
he has never made any antisemitic remarks but he had no choice.
saying he had not do so when a fake report was so largely aknowledged as being true, had been leak in the media, was carreer suicide.
dotn you understand what really happened?
why do you htink that he nmade apoliogise in ocotber when the incident happeend at the end of july 2006?
Becasue they were waitign to see if it waspossible to say that in fact he didnt said those things.
i must admit that his asosciate weretn strong enough nor wise enough or had a dobble agenda.
him admiting to it was worse than iod he had said he didnt said so.
you are wrogn he never publicly denied having said sugar tits at that time, its only 2½ years alter, in february 2009, that he said he never said sugar tits.
up to then he was quoted for saying os everywhere and still is,.
during that dfamous interview of dyna sawyer at GMA, he did admit havign said sugar tits.
Dyane saywer ask him about it and mentioned it and he didnt deny it at all.
Thus he had never said it and it was proven latwer on.
but he had to wait that it was proven beign worng by the police departement itself before coming forht with it.
up to then he pretended being guilty of something he had never done.
so put 2 and 2 together!
That antisemitic rant never happened and was created later on, by the arresting officer and harvey levi form TMZ to can make a scoop and for Mee to can get some money.
harvey must have tell Mee “baa ya know, he is an antisemite anyway, he made the passion of the Christ, so lets nail him”..whatever argument he used the money was the primary one, and the police document is a fake.
it was for exemple never investigated, and nobody ever tried to found out if it was fausle or true because mel Gbsin had already admited to it on TV!! so as you can see it was a circle ending!
Mel Gibson made his own trap by goign on tv and saying he was sorry! that was a big mistake all doen for PR thanks ot alan nierob who should be fired since a long time!
The problem too is tha tpeople have get so used to thinkign that he did that and that he is an antisemite that htey cant even imagine in their mind that this was a fake and never happend.
maybe we have to look at psychology and see that humans cant admit being manipualtedby the media even they shoudl know its the case, and admit of having fooled themselves, by beleiving that this was true. for so long. I mena, it was TMZ that did this, people shoudl ahve known better, both the other media, but also peole at hollywood and the police department
the porblem too was that Mel gisbon wasnt charged for havig made antisemtic rant but only for the DUI arrest, for drunkdriving, so it also ment that there was no investigation waht so wever as for if he actualy said it or not!
and harvey Levi, director of TMZ, is also a lawyer, and he knew that in advance!
Therefor too he was sooo scared when he heard that the sherif had investigated the telefon calls freom officer mee to harvey levi and form harvey lievi to officer mee, becuase he feard that those conversations had been taped and then he wil have been traped and that was the end of TMZ and nmost certainly a jail conviction for harvey!
remember in nov dec when he went all crazy and made speech at university and to the journalist assiciation screaming for freedomn of expression and that the police had no rights to look into his phone records?
that was hypocrisy form hm! what he was afraid of was bnot so much journalistic rights, than being busted for having planed a fordgery of police state documents, to frame Mel gibson ion a case that was compeltely made up!
because those telephon call will have show that he was askign the officer to make a document and what to add as antisemitic rant in it.
and how ot try to mae it sound true
but be real, reread those rants, does they sound to oyu as soemhting true or as something prefabricated?
Try to think really hard.
I htink its pretty obvius that they are fake.
the document was a fake too andit is very obvious.
there is also no other signature on that document but officer mee signature who is the one who made the fake so it says it all.
also if it was it will ahve been throw out, but TMZ said it wa skept in a safe, what for?
to sell it later on? then its blackmailing..
as a memory? too unreal
but at the same time the copy of it at TNMZ was made like if the paoer had been all messed up wiht, like it had been throw out in a trahs, wish is in contradictin with the story that it was kept in a safe!
the whole thing ´dotn hang together there is too many discrepencies!
another doscrepency is that that fake , was attemopted to be presented as beign the original document of the 2 police reports (one of them had to be a fake) to do so it ocntrianed the excact same think as in the official report, but.. a few sentences were added and they were the sentences about sugar tits and the antisemitc remarks.
All the rest was identical.
Those antisemitc remarks had to be removed, and were lined out, with a pen, they were crossed up, only usualy if oyu want soemhtig to be out nad deleted, you will just cross it so its invisible an dusualy in report they simply use a big marker, and thats all, while here, it waa litte cross up, so you coudl read the entire thing, with a thiny line on it.. hello! doesnt it sounds like a very amatorish made fake to you?
of course its a fake.
Funy, the sugar tits thing wasnt removed, nor cross up!
its all bogus!
and the DUI lawsuit was made basd on the original document the official document and not the one that TMZ leaked out.
do oyu know what that mena?
that officialy the TMZ doc was never acknowledged as being real, and nevermade it through the test!
if it was real kit will ahve had to have the finger print of the sherif on it. i am sure it didnt have.
Somehting terribly worng was doen back then and has to be repaired now.
the question is if the people who were so fast and stood in line ot blame Mel gibson will now be ready to stand up and do somehting to reestablish the truth.
are oyu interested in the truth, or in having anybody also innocent peole beign nailed for crimes they didnt commit, also antisemitism?
Or is Mel Gibson too big of a fish catch for your cause, to can let go of it, even knowing its a mistake?
i would like to see some people reactions to this, and some concrete actions being made.
And if Mel Gibson was innocent, how would you feel? what would you do for him?
Mel Gibson is innocent and never made those antisemitic rants. He was framed and the second police report was a fake.
Are you going to be with to reestablish the truth, or not?
To blame innocents they are millions, to say sorry they are very silent.
would you be the silent one or the one that crave proves and ask for an investigation?
Mel Gibson is a sick and demented manboy. His penis drips with the adulterous vagina juice of a Russian whore and he thinks he’s a pious man. Sick ugly turd!
If Mel Gibson did say that Jews are responsible for all the wars, he told the truth. Why do you think Americans are fighting in the Middle East? For that parasitic state of Israel. The world is waking up.
Ah, yes…the old Zionist rant of ‘never forgive, never forget.’ But, it’s no surprise that that the Jewish-dominated (see: Joel Stein column in the 19 Dec 2008 edition of the Jewish-controlled Los Angeles Times) media continues to pillory Mr. Gibson for his inJEWdicious remarks—assuming he actually made them, of course. If ANY people or group is due an apology, I feel it should be given to the Palestinians, those perpetual victims of the psychotic, genocidal policies of the parasitic, Zionist ‘state’ of Israel…which only exists because of the untold billions of Gentile-generated tax dollars which continue to pour into the funnel of that rogue nation septic tank—that, and the blood of thousands of Gentile American soldiers, which continues to soak into the sands of the Middle East. But, that’s OK…as long as AIPAC and JINSA are happy, who cares about the ‘non-chosen’ people, eh? By the way, for ‘Clint’: would that be the vaginal (not vagina)juices of a Russian-JEWISH whore????? One who has emigrated to Israel, to live in a housing project which once was a grove of Arab-owned olive trees, which had been destroyed by a fleet of Caterpillar tractors, and overseen by the trigger-happy madmen of the IDF??? Just wondering…
when israel stops murdering palestinians & allows the UN in to inspect her nuclear arsenal & the us government stops financing israel to the tune of $700 BILLION (not million)every year then just maybe, we’ll consider apologising…...if we’ve anything to apologise for.
The leaders of the world wide crime gang are jewish , all major businesses are owned or controlled buy the leaders of world zionism. The need to keep the lie of antisemitism alive as a big stick of silence IamTheWitness.Com