|
|

Advertisement
August 24, 2010 | 11:20 am
Posted by Danielle Berrin
| Tweet |

Mark Zuckerberg, the 26-year-old CEO of Facebook, took on a Warholian idea—that anybody could be famous—and created a Website that allows users to be stars of their own lives. Never again would the line between what is public and what is private be clearly understood. By allowing private citizens to reinvent themselves as public figures, Facebook signaled the end of privacy.
And now, the architect of the most powerful social media tool of his generation can’t handle his own spotlight. Turns out, public scrutiny is not so fun.
Now that Zuckerberg is the subject of a big Hollywood movie, “The Social Network,” – which aptly touts the tagline “You don’t get to 500 million friends without making a few enemies”—he is unhappy with the way his image has been cast. Over the weekend, reports at TheWrap.com depicted the young CEO on the verge of a meltdown; and an article in The New York Times detailed fraught negotiations between Facebook and the filmmakers.
“I started Facebook to improve the world, and make it a more transparent place,” Zuckerberg told TheWrap.com’s Sharon Waxman last month at a media conference in Sun Valley. “This movie portrays me as someone who built Facebook so I could meet girls.”
Imagine that.
Whether Zuckerberg is peeved at the perceived misinterpretation, or if he’s just irked at being subject to interpretation, either way, he isn’t handling it well.
Earlier this summer, at the AllThingsD conference on digital media, Zuckerberg made his usual hoodie-adorned appearance, but seemed tense. Waxman wrote on her blog, Waxword, that Zuckerberg seemed “nervous”; during his presentation, he “stammered” and “sweated” a lot. Not exactly the picture of Facebook’s calculated cool. In real media, Zuckerberg is learning, you can’t “untag” yourself from an unflattering photo.
Zuckerberg is hardly the first anxious Jew. But barely pushing 30, and running the world’s most popular social network site under the fishbowl scrutiny of the larger media, Zuckerberg is contending with massive—and massively unique—pressures to perform. He is the Julius Caesar of the Internet, presiding over an illusory empire of 540 million.
From this vantage point, it appears he doesn’t much like the attention. He doesn’t like being exposed. Privacy, he’s learning, is a rare and precious thing. It’s something the creators of “The Social Network” didn’t grant him. The director David Fincher and the writer Aaron Sorkin—two of Hollywood’s most powerful filmmakers—chose to base their movie on a more lurid account of Zuckerberg’s rise than the official version Zuckerberg would have preferred.
According to TheWrap.com, “Facebook negotiated for months with Sony to get them to rely on an authorized history of the company written by New York Times writer David Kirkpatrick, instead of a more rollicking, sexy account by Ben Mezrich, ‘The Accidental Billionaires.’”
“Behind the scenes,” The New York Times reported, “Mr. Zuckerberg and his colleagues have been locked in a tense standoff with the filmmakers, who portray Facebook as founded on a series of betrayals, then fueled by the unappeasable craving of almost everyone for ‘friends’ — the Facebook term for those who connect on its online pages — that they will never really have.”
According to the Times, Facebook “fretted for months” over how to respond to their PR crisis, deciding, in the end, to simply ignore it. Biding his time before his millions of friends get a glimpse of their wearied leader and his motives, Zuckerberg is railing against the film, trying to discredit it with spiteful comments and hoping upon hope that it doesn’t become a cult classic.
Zuckerberg’s fast rise and flimsy footing is an object lesson in the limits of power. What happens when the world you create is not the world you want to live in? Where good intentions give way to troubling results, and friends are “friends” only so long as you deteriorate enough to interest them.
“The Social Network” trailer:
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

2.9.12 at 10:21 am | The image of Hollywood as home to so-called. . .

2.5.12 at 11:10 am | The film is in fact the product of a Jewish. . .

1.25.12 at 7:38 pm | A voice and a vote in the halls of power is. . .
1.24.12 at 10:08 am | With commentary!. . .

1.20.12 at 11:52 am | The most high-profile female attorney in the. . .

1.19.12 at 5:00 pm | . . .

5.17.11 at 7:55 am | While Shriver seeks self-betterment,. . . (1328)

2.9.12 at 10:21 am | The image of Hollywood as home to so-called. . . (660)

10.18.11 at 4:56 pm | Does Susan Sarandon have any idea of what a Nazi. . . (117)



We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
hollywood jewish hollywood jew jewishjournal.com jewish journal celebrity storyblog arts israel sundance actor film life los angeles actress natalie portman community singer tv jews movie music movies oscars holy rollers director tel aviv jesse eisenberg madonna fashion marriage adam lambert politics sundance film festival entertainment jew joan rivers aaron sorkin daniel radcliffe oscar
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
Blogs
Bloggish-mobile
Foodaism-mobile
Hollywood Jew-mobile
Jews and Mormons-mobile
Keeping it Real-mobile
Keeping the Faith-mobile
Morethodoxy-mobile
Nice Jewish Doctor-mobile
Rosners Domain-mobile
Tattletales-mobile
The God Blog-mobile
The Ticket-moblie
Leisure-mobile
Multimedia-iPad
Photos-iPad
Videos-iPad
| |||||||||
Zuckerberg the Julius Caesar of the Internet? Rumour has it that Caesar’s last words were: “Et tu Brute” Sound more Twitter than FB to me….
It is just a peak into Zuckerberg’s life…simply a portrayl…with some truths and some exaggerations. ...perhaps more of the latter. From a PR standpoint…it will remain in the spotlight until the next big movie portrayl pushes it to the wayside. Ride the wave…it will go away. Move on, Mark. You’re a genius and a phenomenon. People will simply, always be curious.
With 500 million “friends” (now 600 million and counting), who needs enemies?!!! This just goes to show, a sterling character trumps intelligence by far. Brains without spirit informing the soul, controlling the bodily impulses, spells disaster. This is Life 101. Is all the money in the world worth it?
Hey
Baby brother
love you
Sonya