
Advertisement
July 18, 2012 | 9:05 pm
Posted by Danielle Berrin

As if there will ever be another Nora Ephron. But I did hear the comparison made earlier today during a review of British author Caitlin Moran’s new book, “How To Be A Woman,” a bestseller in her native UK described by The New York Times as “part memoir, part philosophical rant, part manifesto written with the lightest touch” that “aims to make women proud of being feminists.” The feminist vein of the book and comic tone of its author explains why an Ephron parallel has been made, though I hardly think Ephron would define feminism thusly:
Here is a quick way of working out if you’re a feminist. put your hand in your pants.
a) do you have a vagina? and
b) do you want to be in charge of it?
if you said ‘yes’ to both, then congratulations! you’re a feminist.
That recent entry from Moran’s tumblr account (though its title is rather vulgar you can access it here) indicates the general tone of her writing. A longtime columnist for The Times of London, she apparently penned “How To Be A Woman” on a bit of a dare.
Lamenting the current state of raggedy old feminism, a group of women journalists were out to dinner when, as Peggy Orenstein describes on Slate.com, one of them had an idea:
Finally, someone—it’s unclear who—said that one of them needed to write a book: something raucous and real about why feminism still mattered. A taking-stock of womanhood in an age of unprecedented freedoms and nagging contradictions.
And Caitlin Moran responded: “OK, I’ll race you!”
Five months later, “How To Be A Woman” was released in the UK—and 16 other countries—and sold upwards of 400,000 copies. The American edition, released by Harper Perennial hit bookstores earlier this week and so far, reviews have been profuse and flattering. “It is pretty phenomenal,” declared The Atlantic’s Jen Doll.
Like Ephron, Moran focuses on female concerns—unfair beauty standards, sexism, menstruation and bikini waxes (“I can’t believe we’ve got to a point where it’s basically costing us money to have a vagina,” she writes). While Ephron avoided the pitfalls of “pubic deforestation,” as Orenstein wryly put it, she did write a famous essay about breasts—or her lack thereof: “I knew that no one would ever want to marry me. I had no breasts. I would never have breasts.” Moran gripes about 37-year-old beauty maintenance the way Ephron used to gripe about age. One hates Brazilians, the other felt bad about her neck. But whereas Ephron remembers her first bra-fitting at a Beverly Hills store, Moran grew up poor and obscure in a public housing development the eldest of eight children.
Where they differ socioeconomically, they converge philosophically. They might have mutually mourned, for instance, how few young women count themselves “feminists” nowadays, as if it connotes schoolmarm rather than savvy.
The word “feminism,” Moran said, has for some reason gone off the rails to connote, incorrectly, preachy humorlessness and grim separatism. “When I talk to girls, they go, ‘I’m not a feminist,’ ” she said. “And I say: ‘What? You don’t want to vote? Do you want to be owned by your husband? Do you want your money from your job to go into his bank account? If you were raped, do you still want that to be a crime? Congratulations: you are a feminist.’”
But while Moran is already fantasizing about her first Oscar (she told The Times she will wear the jumpsuit from “Ghostbusters”) Ephron is already in the Hollywood Hall of Fame.
Oh, and just for fun, this:
The Atlantic’s Jen Doll: What are the differences between the Americanized and British versions?
Moran: Mainly it’s just replacing the s in certain words with zed. It was funny, though, there are cultural differences in each country. It’s a very British thing to refer the Nazis, for example, but in the German edition whenever I jokingly did this, they were like, you need to make it very clear that the Nazis were a heinous regime. In America they wanted to remove all references to Nazis entirely. We didn’t.
Read the full Q-and-A here.

5.23.13 at 5:48 pm | Was there no way to portray Fitzgerald’s Jew as. . .

5.21.13 at 9:43 am | Tribal affiliation notwithstanding, Apatow, 45,. . .

5.20.13 at 12:02 pm |

5.19.13 at 2:45 pm | The Coen brothers and others prove clueless on. . .

5.2.13 at 12:21 pm | Of all the roles one plays in life, how many are. . .

4.24.13 at 5:45 pm | I was supposed to be in the middle of a very. . .

5.18.12 at 2:38 pm | Now in it's fifth season, Jewishness on "Mad Men". . . (3107)

5.20.13 at 12:02 pm | (1700)

5.19.13 at 2:45 pm | The Coen brothers and others prove clueless on. . . (803)






We welcome your feedback.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com reserves the right to use your comment in our weekly print publication.
hollywood jewish hollywood jew jewishjournal.com jewish journal israel celebrity storyblog bloghome film arts oscars los angeles sundance academy awards actor actress life movies natalie portman singer movie community music aaron sorkin tel aviv jews madonna tv hollywoodjew entertainment television marriage jesse eisenberg steven spielberg politics director holy rollers obama adam lambert
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
| |||||||||