|
|

Advertisement
May 12, 2010 | 12:17 pm
Posted by Danielle Berrin
| Tweet |

Brett Ratner and I have a sordid past.
He was my first big Hollywood profile and he left a lasting impression—or depression, depending on how you look at it (see below). Last week, at the Simon Wiesenthal Center gala honoring Ron Howard and Brian Grazer, I decided it was high time we made up. After all, he’s a Hollywood director and I’m a Hollywood journalist and we’re bound to cross paths every now and then, just like a pair of estranged lovers. And wouldn’t it be better if we got along? Besides, we have history.
After I introduced myself to Ratner anew, he grabbed me by the arm, pulled me to his table, and said to Howard and Grazer sitting across from him, “You see this girl? She almost ruined me!”
If you’re curious as to why, read my 2008 profile of the ‘nice Jewish director’:
I’ve been cornered downstairs in the gold lamé disco basement at Brett Ratner’s house and he’s hitting on me.
His insistence suggests he’s accustomed to getting his way with this, and I’m trying not to think about the surroundings—a wealthy bachelor’s lavish playpen, which quite conspicuously insinuates sex.
“Can we go on a date?” Ratner asks, drawing closer. “My mom loves you.”
He doesn’t seem to care that I’m a journalist on assignment or that when he offered to give me a tour of his Benedict Canyon manse, I was thrilled to explore the architecture: a Tudor-style estate designed by Hoover Dam architect Gordon Kaufman.
I push him away and tell him I’m seeing someone, but he insists that shouldn’t matter since I’m not yet married.
“I really want to pursue you,” he says in his soft, almost effeminate voice. “When are we going out? I like you. Are you gonna make me wait? Don’t make me wait.”

5.24.12 at 4:03 pm | . . .

5.23.12 at 12:39 pm | Is the fancy Festival du Cannes snobbish and. . .

5.23.12 at 11:25 am | Self-actualization can be such a drag. Just ask. . .

5.22.12 at 9:21 pm | It took Daniel Mendelsohn's discursive and. . .
5.22.12 at 2:07 pm | A few weeks ago when I was interviewing. . .

5.22.12 at 2:02 pm | There's big buzz coming out of Cannes for Michael. . .

5.17.11 at 8:55 am | While Shriver seeks self-betterment,. . . (445)

3.23.10 at 10:19 am | After a six year engagement, Sacha Baron Cohen,. . . (241)

5.23.12 at 11:25 am | Self-actualization can be such a drag. Just ask. . . (199)





We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
hollywood jewish hollywood jew jewish journal jewishjournal.com celebrity storyblog arts film israel sundance los angeles actor actress life bloghome natalie portman oscars academy awards community movies singer movie music tv jews marriage director tel aviv jesse eisenberg madonna holy rollers adam lambert politics sundance film festival mel gibson entertainment fashion died joan rivers
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
Blogs
Bloggish-mobile
Foodaism-mobile
Hollywood Jew-mobile
Jews and Mormons-mobile
Keeping it Real-mobile
Keeping the Faith-mobile
Morethodoxy-mobile
Nice Jewish Doctor-mobile
Rosners Domain-mobile
Tattletales-mobile
The God Blog-mobile
The Ticket-moblie
Leisure-mobile
Multimedia-iPad
Photos-iPad
Videos-iPad
Passover Reader
| |||||||||
Who cares? You are boring, and bragging. Write about something that matters. Not you.
Ok, so YOU decided to bury the hatchet? Why, because YOU want to kiss his ass some more, like you do ALL the subjects of your Puff pieces? NEXT!
Laurel,
I hardly think calling Ratner out on his sexual aggression was ‘kissing his ass.’ And just so you know, I agonized over whether or not to put myself in the piece, ultimately deciding that it would be dishonest not to. I’m sorry if you misconstrue that as sycophancy.
Danielle
It’s not the content of the 2008 article that was sycophantic, but rather, the burying-of-the-hatchet that was. After all, what did he do to merit your burying it? Nothing! So you’re basically just excusing him because, why? Because time has passed? Because you work in the same business and may need another favor from him in the future? That’s where the sycophancy plays into this. In that article (which I suffered through in 2008 and therefore did not have to re-read) he proved himself to be nothing short of immature, obnoxious, spoiled and entitled. He disrespected you, maybe because you are an attractive female who was on his turf.
That said, what did he do to deserve your forgiveness? Did he locate you and apologize first? No. Did he become philanthropic and donate to your favorite charity? I doubt it. So what on earth did he do to merit your forgiveness? Nothing. Nothing more than simply continuing to be a successful famous director, whose attention someone in your position needs.
Why can’t you be strong and hold out for him to apologize to YOU? Because you’re a “Hollywood Journalist”? Whose future script you may want him to direct? Aha.