
Advertisement
Posted by Adam Wills

SETI Institute’s senior scientist Seth Shostak recently took on some implausible elements in “Avatar” on Space.com, most notably the feasibility of mining that precious mineral worth $20 million a kilogram—unobtainium. It’s not worth the expense, he says:
I do want to note something about the premise, because Tinseltown has used the idea of interstellar mining over and over. Simply put: Is there some naturally occurring element or compound that would really be worth hauling back to Earth from another star system?
This question was addressed two centuries ago, when England began to send people (mostly low-grade criminals) to Australia. This population needed something to export to London to earn foreign currency, and they settled on wool. This was not because the Aussies are particularly fond of sheep (although New Zealanders have plenty of jokes about that), but only because wool is very expensive per pound. Sending it back to Europe was expensive, and Australian wool would only be competitive in the London markets if the shipping costs were a small fraction of the product value. Even in the day of wooden ships, this criterion was met.
Now let’s consider the tariff for sending a kilo of unobtainium back to Earth. Our descendents in this film have some pretty nifty looking rockets, and we hear shortly after the opening titles that the trip to Pandora takes only about five years (as measured on-board). Well, even the nearest other star system, Proxima Centauri, is 4.3 light-years from where you’re sitting. That means that transport between Earth and Pandora occurs at 85% the speed of light or more!
Getting a kilogram of unobtainium (or anything else) up to that speed, and then decelerating it at the end of the ride, takes at least 1017 joules of energy. That’s freshman physics. What’s the cost of that energy? Our cheapest joules are supplied by your local utility company at about ten cents a kilowatt hour, or 36 million joules per dollar. At that rate, the price of shipping a kilo of unobtainium works out to $3 billion, or — assuming 2% annual inflation between now and 150 years from now — $50 billion in 2154 c.e. dollars (that’s the year in which the film takes place).
In other words, the transport costs for unobtainium exceed the value of the merchandise by a factor of more than 2,500!
So that settles that. You are not about to pay $60,000 to Amazon as the shipping charge for this month’s best seller. Interstellar mining — and the affront to natives it might imply — should be tactfully removed from Hollywood’s box of tropes.

7.10.12 at 5:39 pm | Your best GeekHeeby options when you can’t get. . .

7.1.12 at 1:45 pm | Fan boys want to be him, and the voice actor’s. . .

5.17.12 at 2:24 pm | Could “The Possession” be the first TRULY. . .

8.25.11 at 1:30 pm | Dani and Eytan Kollin add some Yiddishkayt to the. . .

7.14.11 at 2:27 pm | "Black Swan" star confesses she's a "massive". . .

7.11.11 at 1:35 pm | Don't-miss people, panels and previews at 2011. . .

5.7.09 at 4:00 pm | Chasids in space, Kohanim blessings -- hidden. . . (356)

6.11.09 at 9:23 pm | "Aliens" actress Jenette Goldstein teaches. . . (20)

7.29.08 at 9:45 pm | The first “practical” jetpack is on the. . . (18)






July 2012
May 2012
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
| |||||||||