|
|

Advertisement
March 30, 2011
| Tweet | Share |
|
A couple of years ago, I wrote a public letter to President Obama applauding his commitment to peace in the Middle East, but warning that he should be prepared to fail. My reasoning was that he was following Albert Einstein’s definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and hoping for a different result.
In critiquing his approach, I used the metaphor of trying to plant a flower into desert sand. No matter how hard you try to force it, if the earth isn’t right, nothing will grow.
This flower — a sapling would be a more apt metaphor — represents peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians. For nearly two decades, this little tree has been paraded around the world as the “key to peace in the Middle East.” Accordingly, no issue has captivated globetrotting diplomats quite like this one.
Among all diplomats, perhaps the one who has spent the most time on this issue has been Dennis Ross, the point man on the peace process for three U.S. presidents, including the current administration.
Several years ago, Ross said something to me at a charity event that stuck with me: His biggest regret was that they didn’t enforce the anti-incitement clause in the Oslo agreement.
Ross was revealing a painful truth about the peace process — you can’t have peace without education. You can haggle over borders all day long, but if the people living within those borders are poisoned with hate and are not prepared for compromise, no leader will sign on to an “end of conflict” agreement.
You can make a good case that, had the Palestinian Authority spent the last two decades selling peace to its people, they’d have their own state by now and we’d be talking today about common projects, not Qassam rockets.
But of course they didn’t sell peace. Instead, they sold the well-worn script of Arab dictators who need to build street cred with the masses: Demonize the Jews and the Zionist entity. Is it any wonder that Palestinian leaders, from Arafat to Abbas, have found it so difficult to say yes to Israeli peace offers? How could they compromise with an enemy they helped to demonize?
What would they say to their people? Sorry, we lied to you — the Jews really do have a claim to this land? It’s true, they’ve had a presence in Jerusalem for more than 3,000 years? If Israel is willing to withdraw settlements for the sake of peace, we should also be willing to compromise on the right of return? Let’s be nice with them so they will help us create a great country?
What is so shocking about those simple words is that we have never heard them spoken by any Palestinian leader, in English or in Arabic.
Yet those words were the crucial missing ingredients to nourish the tree of peace. They needed to be spoken not occasionally at interfaith meetings, but consistently and persuasively in Palestinian schools, media, summer camps and mosques.
But who ever dared pressure Palestinian leaders to speak those words? Peace groups? A global community that kept pouring billions into Palestinian coffers while reinforcing their narrative of exclusive victimhood? The United States, which never gave Palestinians any incentive to stop glorifying terrorism and start teaching peace?
When Obama the peacemaker finally had his chance, instead of promoting peace, he promoted the tired old trope of putting pressure on Israel to make more unilateral concessions.
Instead of launching, for example, a breakthrough peace-education campaign to convey to Palestinians that peace was worth compromising on the right of return, and to Israelis that peace would not mean suicide, he came up with a new excuse for Palestinians to stay away from peace talks: A Jewish construction freeze as a precondition to those talks.
By the time he realized his blunder, it was too late. He had already lost both sides. As Rabbi Donniel Hartman politely suggested last week in a “Letter to Obama,” Israeli society “doesn’t fully trust you yet.”
Ironically, neither do the Palestinians, who, given no incentive by the United States to negotiate or compromise, simply flew off to make their own deal with the world.
Obama planted seeds all right, but instead of seeds of peace, they were seeds of failure.
David Suissa is a branding consultant and the founder of OLAM magazine. For speaking engagements and other inquiries, he can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) or davidsuissa.com.
A version of this article appeared in print.
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
We welcome your feedback. Please share your views and insight in The Jewish Journal Reader Forums.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.
mr. suissa is once again in the realm of an ad campaign not journalism where israel is in an endless readiness to compromise and all palestnians are terrotists. Looking for seeds of failure ? trust Dennis Ross’ opinions ? How about this from his book The Missing peace
“Translating an idea into action seemed beyond his grasp. It was not a lack of intelligence; few are more intelligent than Bibi Netanyahu. It was an impulsive lack of judgment, and a lack of a feel for the Arabs generally. “
you can also check Ross’s speech and the (horrors!) recent jstreet conference
http://blogs.jpost.com/content/dennis-ross-j-street-full-transcript
it would be nice if Mr. Suissa actually did some research. Abbas gave a detailled 30 min interview to israeli tv (partial translation below). In which he stated that he and olmert were close to a compromise on a 2 state solution with a final resolution of ALL outstanding issues and that if bibi were to return to the table based on olmerts proposals a final peace could be concluded in 72 hours. A deafening silence from Bibi
now that’s not just seeds of failure its trees of failure
http://www.miftah.org/display.cfm?DocId=22052&CategoryId=5
David, a favour, would you ask the publisher of the Soros supported misnamed “Jewish"Journal why as of 9am Sunday, more than 24 hours after Goldstone, author of the UN “report” recanted his statements that Israel targeted civilians in her police actions (and what a scumbag Goldstone is), the “J"Journal has not carried that story. Is it because Eshman so hates Israel that he won’t carry until way late a statement that absolves Israel of blame that she never deserved?
And btw, whinneyman, go stuff yourself.
l wynmanI’m using this post to communicate with you since you may be notified (and only two or three others may be notified) Brookings has extensive minutes on this.In spite of public statements and selectively leaked statements, Mahmoud Abbas,Salem Fayyad and the rest of the PA have not budged from their demands: (minimum )the West Bank and East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights to be 100% Jew free; full right of return for Palestinian refugees and their descendents to what is now “called Israel”. Equal rights for Palestinians within Israel, etc. etc. and thus,tomorrow all of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Haifa, etc.
MORE FOR l wynman
Rashid Khalidi has prevailed within the Obama administration as he claimed he would, and as I warned he might. He is dedicated to the destruction of Israel. He makes no bones about it in his public statements and he brags about his access to the White House where he has been one of Obama’s most frequent visitors. In these efforts he has been supported by Brezinski and Scowcroft and others in the “foreign policy establishment” who have long been regarded as “pronounced enemies of Israel.”
| |||||||||
Oye, Suissa. How dare you speak like this about the first Jewish president of the USA! The gates of hell are just about to open…!