Bloggish

November 3, 2009 | 3:05 pm

The Wall Project: Good Cause, Bad Comparison

Posted by Rob Eshman

Photo

The Wall Project on Wilshire

Almost everything about The Wall Project screams brilliant.

On the south side of Wilshire Blvd. and Ogden St., across from the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, cranes have placed eight segments from the original Berlin Wall.  The 40 by 10 foot section of wall is the largest displayed outside of Berlin, where the entire wall divided Communist East Berlin from democratic West Berlin for 28 years.

The Culver City-based Wende Museum of the Cold War launched The Wall Project to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, on November 9, 1989.

From the Wende Museum’s press release:

Wilshire Blvd. will close at 10pm for the installation of a concert stage and an 40’ by 10’ wall of art that was painted by dozens of L.A. artists as an homage to the original Berlin Wall.  Contributing artists include SHEPARD FAIREY and original Berlin Wall artist THIERRY NOIR.  Festivities begin at 11pm with films, recorded music, and meetings with the artists in front of their wall panels.  At 11:30pm, dignitaries and special guests will be introduced followed by a live performance by legendary German chanteuse UTE LEMPER.  At midnight, the Mayor of Berlin, KLAUS WOWEREIT, will deliver a delayed big screen message from Berlin and a large section of the 80’ art wall will be ceremonially torn down.  Festivities close with an encore performance by Ute Lemper.

The event is FREE and being presented by THE WENDE MUSEUM AND ARCHIVE OF THE COLD WAR in Culver City, which houses one of the largest collections of Eastern European Cold War art and artifacts in the world.

I drove to visit the wall section yesterday, parked my car on Ogden and walked out to the wall, which looks puny at the foot of a massive white hi-rise.  Chilling, to think how many people and nations were held captive by this load of concrete. On my tiptoes I could reach up and almost touch the very top.

The Wall became a medium for some of the most powerful street art ever made, beginning when Berlin artist Thierry Noir had the audacity to enoble the barrier with his bright colors. Wende executive director Justinian Jampol had the brilliant idea of bringing Noir to the festivities, along with Shepard Fairey, the artist who created (yes, off an AP photo) Obama’s iconic “HOPE” poster.  Both men will paint a symbolic wall across Wilshire Blvd. on Nov. 9 to demonstrate the cruel reality of life behind a barrier.

Fairey told The Los Angeles Times blogger Diane Haithman he will use the opportuinity to draw parallels between the Berlin wall, the U.S. Mexico border, and “The Wall of Palestinine:”

In my exclusive story in today’s Calendar section on the Wall Project—an ambitious effort spearheaded by the Wende Museum of the Cold War that calls for erecting a symbolic Berlin Wall across busy Wilshire Boulevard in November, on the 20th anniversary of the fall of the real wall in Berlin—it was revealed that Los Angeles artists Shepard Fairey (above with his iconic “Hope” poster for Barack Obama) and Kent Twitchell, along with Berlin-based Frenchman Thierry Noir, will be the key artists lending their work to the project. In fact, all three will do at least some of their painting on panels that will become part of the Wall Project in public spaces, where passers-by can watch the process.

As mentioned in the story, muralist Twitchell (recently in the news because of his 100-foot-tall mural of the late Michael Jackson, which was never mounted in an outdoor public space) plans to create portraits of Presidents John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan, the presidents leading the country, respectively, when the wall rose and when it fell. In recent weeks, Twitchell has been combing through the archives of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Library in Simi Valley for photos to inspire his work. “I think I’ve found the ones I want,” he said. “Kennedy looks so young, and Reagan looks so old—when I put them side to side, they almost look like father and son.”  (*Update: An earlier version of this report incorrectly referred to John F. Kennedy as Robert F. Kennedy)

In a conversation this morning Fairey also offered some of this plans. Although not wanting…

to be specific—“I don’t want to metaphorically or literally paint myself into a corner,” he joked—Fairey says he is most likely going to make an “antiwar, anti-containment piece” that makes a parallel to the Wall of Palestine.

“My feeling is that of course it’s a very complicated situation, but I’m a believer that you can’t punish the many for the crimes of the few,” Fairey says.“I believe in [former President Jimmy] Carter’s assessment that there is an apartheid situation there.”

He said the piece will not be deliberately inflammatory but, he trusts, provocative.


By the Wall of Palestine, Fairey means the controversial barrier that Israel began constructing in 1994 to separate itself from the West Bank.  There are many good and some not-so-good things about the Separation barrier, which in some places is a solid wall and in others a high-security fence.  But to compare it head on to the Berlin Wall does a gross injustice to Israel, to Berliners who survived the Wall, and to Truth, which Art is supposed to serve.

Our reporter contacted Jampol for an interview about this, and Jampol responded through his PR rep with this statement:

“There are over thirty artists involved in The Wall Project, which provides a canvas for diverse voices and opinions about physical and psychological walls. For nearly every position, there is an artist who takes the other side. My own biography includes a complicated relationship with the Berlin Wall. My grandparents are Jewish Americans who fought the Nazis and believed strongly that Germany should remain divided and that the Wall should stay intact. On November 8, I will oversee the 20th anniversary commemorations of the fall of the Berlin Wall.”

Writing in The Nation, Jon Wiener correctly predicted facile comparisons between Walls would upset conservatives.  He wrote:

In an interview with the LA Times, Fairey said his painting on the wall in L.A. would be an “antiwar, anti-containment piece” that “makes a parallel to the Wall of Palestine.”
Thierry Noir told the Times that his painting would draw an analogy between the Berlin Wall and the border wall between the US and Mexico – the point being, he said, that “every wall is not built forever.”
Maybe Fairey and Noir mean that the Israeli wall and the US border wall should come down, the way the Berlin Wall did, and allow free movement—of Palestinians into Israel, and of Mexicans into the US.
And maybe they mean more than that. The Berlin Wall prevented victims of Stalinism from reaching freedom in the West; Fairey’s point seems to be that the Israeli wall prevents victims of Zionism from exercising their right of return to their historic homes in Palestine.
Thierry Noir’s point seems to be that the US border wall, like the Berlin Wall, divides one country into two: what was once all-Mexican territory in California and the Southwest. And, like divided Germany, the two sides of the Mexican border—“Aztlan”—should be, and perhaps will be, re-united some day.
An undivided Palestine; an undivided Aztlan: these meanings found in the Berlin Wall commemoration are likely to drive conservatives into a wild rage. First Amendment defenders of course will invoke the freedom of the artist. A fight over the meaning of freedom: what better way to celebrate the anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall?

I don’t know if there will be an artist who will “take the other side” of Fairey’s parallel between the Berlin Wall and the Separation Barrier—after all, Jampol said “nearly” every position will have its counterpoint—so permit me to give 10 reasons why one is not like the other.  Feel free to print, clip and distribute this at the event—which I look forward to attending.  It really is a brilliant idea.

TOP TEN REASONS THIS WALL IS NOT THAT WALL

1. Israel built the wall to keep Palestinian terrorists from killing soldiers and civilians.  If there were no terror attacks, there would be no barrier. The murder of an Israeli teenage girl in 1992 first prompted leaders to call for the barrier. The Berlin Wall was built by the Soviet Union not to keep terrorists out of East Berlin, but to keep civilians in.

2. Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin wanted the Wall to preserve a Jewish majority in a Jewish state established by the international community in 1948. He knew that majority would be threatened by Israel’s annexation of the West Bank and Gaza, which those to the right of Rabin proposed. “We do not want a majority of the Jewish residents of the state of Israel, 98% of whom live within the borders of sovereign Israel, including a united Jerusalem, to be subject to terrorism,” he said.  Berlin’s Wall was built to keep East Berliners subject to a dictatorial ideology against their will.

3. The route of the barrier has been subject to frequent rulings by the Israeli Supreme Court to mitigate the hardship it poses to Palestinians. The people who built the Berlin Wall didn’t give a crap about the hardships it imposed.

4. The security barrier has greatly decreased terror attacks in Israel, allowing Israel’s Jews and Arabs to live with greater security and prosperity, and reducing the Israeli army’s need for actions against Palestinians.  The barrier has saved lives on both sides of the conflict. The Berlin Wall led directly to the death of some 200 people who tried to escape.

5. Many Palestinians have come to appreciate the security of the barrier.  East Berliners were never big fans of the Wall.  From Wikipedia:

In June 2004, The Washington Times[42] reported that the reduced Israeli military incursions in Jenin have prompted efforts to rebuild damaged streets and buildings and a gradual return to a semblance of normality, and in a letter[43] dated October 25, 2004, from the Israeli mission to Kofi Annan, Israel’s government pointed out that a number of restrictions east of the barrier have been lifted as a result of it, including a reduction in checkpoints from 71 to 47 and roadblocks from 197 to 111. The Jerusalem Post reports that, for some Palestinians who are Israeli citizens living in the Israeli Arab town of Umm el-Fahm (population 42,000) near Jenin, the barrier has “significantly improved their lives” because, on one hand, it prevents would-be thieves or terrorists from coming to their town and, on the other hand, has increased the flow of customers from other parts of Israel who would normally have patronised Palestinian business in the West Bank, resulting in an economic boom. The report states that the downsides are that the barrier has divided families in half and “damaged Israeli Arabs’ solidarity with the Palestinians living on the other side of the Green Line”.[44]
A UN report released in August 2005 observed that the existence of the barrier “replaced the need for closures: movement within the northern West Bank, for example, is less restrictive where the Barrier has been constructed. Physical obstacles have also been removed in Ramallah and Jerusalem governorates where the Barrier is under construction.” The report notes that more freedom of movement in rural areas may ease Palestinian access to hospitals and schools, but also notes that restrictions on movement between urban population centers have not significantly changed.[45]

6.Israelis would prefer NOT to have the barrier.  The Soviets loved their Wall.

Israelis would prefer safe, free travel between Israel and the West Bank in both directions.  They recognize the tremendous hardships it places on the Palestinians.  They understand it can be used by the political echelons for land appropriations. They understand the cost Palestinians pay in health and economic development by being behind the barrier.  But they also know a wall can be talken down when a political settlement agreeable to both sides is in place.  “Walls can be torn down and land and rights can be restored,” one Israeli diplomat told me.  “But you can’t replace lives lost to terror.”

7. The Berlin Wall stood for 28 years.  The Israeli occupation of the West Bank is in its 41st year.  Okay, you got me there.

8. Israel on the 1967 border side of the Separation Barrier is a free society, where dissent thrives, and artists like Fairey can say what they want.  East Berlin was a totalitarian police state.

Israel isn’t perfect, but Tel Aviv is more like Berlin than any other city I can think of. If you had to be a gay Arab male anywhere in the Middle East, you’d want to be in Tel Aviv.  As for the other side of the fence, as Thomas Friedman has reported, under the leadership of Mahmous Abbas and Salam Fayyed, Palestinians are on a path toward economic development and cooperation with Israel that will speed them toward a stable and economically viable state—as long as they can control their radicals.

9. Israel’s Right originally opposed the Separation Barrier. The Soviet hardliners loved the Berlin Wall.

Israel’s rightists saw it as a de facto cutting up of the Land of Israel, which they believe they must take over. The Left saw the barrier as a way to signify that Israel must not control territory that should be part of a Palestinian state. 

10. In a future Palestinian State, Palestinians could live free, secure and economically viable lives, even with the Separation Barrier in place. East Berliners could never be free behind their wall.

The majority of Israelis do not want to control the territories or annex them.  There has long been support in Israel for a two state solution with a trustworthy Palestinian partner.  Yes not every Israeli government has pursued negotiations in good faith, but the Palestinians, under Yasser Arafat and under Hamas, have given Israel little reason to be trusting. If Abbas and Fayyed can enter negotiations with no preconditions and bring their countrymen along, they will find the Israeli people will be the first to take their hammers to that barrier.

More pics of The Wall Project:


Find more photos like this on EveryJew.com

8 CommentsLeave your comment

COMMENTS

We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.

Privacy Policy

Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.

Terms of Service

JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.

Some of those are terrific. The only downside with graffiti is the poor image and lack of areas to practice. The art form itself has generated a number of terrific pieces. While the idea of it was originally founded on vandalism, I think it has a great chance of continuing to grow if we can apply limits that artists can grow out of.

Comment by webgirl on 11/04/09 at 4:18 pm

One more reason this wall is not that wall: The Berlin Wall ran along an actual borderline between two discrete lands.  By contrast, the majority of the wall that Israel has constructed in the West Bank lies not on the internationally-recognized border between the two lands (i.e., the Green Line), but instead deliberately detours *into* the West Bank, annexing huge chunks of territory that do not belong to Israel under any possible interpretation of international law.  That’s why Israel’s wall in the West Bank has been ruled illegal by the International Court of Justice and the UN General Assembly, and it’s also why the West Bank wall has been declared a violation of the Geneva Convention by the International Committee of the Red Cross as well as Amnesty International.

If Israel would simply build her wall along her own border (as a tool of defense) and not in land that does not belong to her (as a tool of annexation), the wall would be in full compliance with international law.

Patrick Meighan
Culver City, CA

Comment by Patrick Meighan on 11/04/09 at 11:01 pm

Since Israel doesn’t actually have an internationally recognized border, but merely a cease-fire line, and since the Palestinians don’t recognize any part of Israel within any borders whatsoever, Israel is free to build whatever fence it feels like wherever it likes, without breaking any international laws.

Daveed Shachar
Dimona, Israel

Comment by Daveed Shachar on 11/05/09 at 6:07 am

the wall project: as a person who never met his father’s family as they were exterminated in poland by the nazis in the 2nd world war, i must share my opinion on the berlin wall project and the 20th anniversary of it fall. Surely this is a symbol of how to right a wrong, to bring justice where there is none. but for the author of this piece, Rob Eshman,  to support what is the most negative symbol in the world today, and that is the horrific wall that divides human beings in the state of Israel and Palestine, of which both peoples have the right to live freely on this planet, is to support what one would be hard stretched to find a more right wing, fascistic form of government in the world today, and that of course is the Israeli government.
This isn’t about religion. This is about stopping any form of segregation which regardless of the excuses, is wrong. Wrong. Wrong. I’m ashamed of Israel and any person that supports such a discusting injustice in the world today.  And this Wall Project should stand for the realisation that such walls in contemporary society anywhere in the world is one of hate and destruction.

Comment by pete stern on 11/05/09 at 7:26 am

the wall in Palestine is illegal, and steals land from Palesinians one olive tree at a time. 

jewish democracy is a fantasy: WAKE UP

Comment by Andrew on 11/08/09 at 12:58 pm

I’m not Jewish and I have no agenda here. I’ve studied the Israel situation for years and I am beginning to believe that the growing anti Israel sentiments is nothing less than a newspeak for the old antisemitism. It is as angry and blaming and full of “reasons” as Hitler before WW2. If ever a nation had a right to be free and safe it is little Israel. If all her enemies laid down thier arms there would be no change whatsoever. If Israel gave up her arms she would be slaughtered and be no more.

Comment by Kent Twitchell on 11/09/09 at 5:57 pm

God help us! No one can ever settle anything when each thinks they are in the right. Israel has to look inward as does Palestine. Ourselves are the only ones who know our motives. When we are righteous, God is with us. As for peace maybe not today nor in a few tomorrows but eventually. Honor what is and work for change.

Comment by judy collier on 11/10/09 at 12:18 am

Berlin wall should not be forgotten and and placing some original segments in various places will help us not forget about what this wall really meant for the germans.

Comment by Aaron on 4/21/11 at 4:17 am

Post a Comment

Name:  
Email:  

Type the word you see below:

Comment:


About this Blog

Blog Home
About the Blogger(s)
Contact

RSS


Blog Archive






Newspaper

Serving a community of 600,000, The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles is the largest Jewish weekly outside New York City. Our award-winning paper reaches over 150,000 educated, involved and affluent readers each week. Subscribe here.

© Copyright 2012 Tribe Media Corp.
All rights reserved. JewishJournal.com is hosted by Nexcess.net. Homepage design by Koret Communications.
Widgets by Mijits. Site construction by Hop Studios.

counter fake hit page