Bloggish

March 11, 2010 | 1:58 pm

Howard Zinn: Israel was a “Mistake.”

Posted by Rob Eshman


The March/April 2010 issue of Moment magazine features a final interview with Howard Zinn, the counter-historian whose People’s History of the United States has become a bible of the campus Left.

Zinn died last January at the age of 87 in Santa Monica.  As we reported then:

Howard Zinn, an American Jewish historian who wrote the “People’s History of the United States,” has died.

Zinn, whose best-seller helped establish him as a central figure of the American left, died of a heart attack Wednesday in California. He was 87.

Along with another Boston-based American Jewish professor, Noam Chomsky, Zinn was a leading left-wing intellectual. His “People’s History,” published in 1980, accused Christopher Columbus of genocide while venerating labor leaders and war opponents.

“He’s made an amazing contribution to American intellectual and moral culture,” Chomsky said, according to the Boston Globe. “He’s changed the conscience of America in a highly constructive way. I really can’t think of anyone I can compare him to in this respect.”

“People’s History” inspired a documentary in 2009 on the History Channel titled “The People Speak.” Zinn narrated the documentary, which highlighted those who spoke up for social change.

Zinn, a New York City native and the son of Jewish immigrants, wrote several books and three plays. His last essay, about President Obama’s first year in office, was published last week in The Nation.

He flew missions throughout Europe during World War II.

I’ve never read an extensive interview with Zinn about his Jewishness and his views on Israel, and writer Jeremy Gillick does an excellent job drawing him out, if not exactly challenging him.

The opening questions give Zinn a chance to reflect on his family, his upbringing in a Yiddish-speaking home, and his parents’ lack of strong political views:

What was your Jewish upbringing like?
My parents were not very religious. They observed the big holidays—Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, Passover—and they kept a kosher household. They spoke Yiddish to one another and English to us, but there was enough Yiddish spoken so that even now I can pretty much understand it. I went to Hebrew school to study for my bar mitzvah and endured it, unenthusiastically. When my bar mitzvah was over, that was the end of my religious activity.

Was your family political?
Not at all. My parents were working people concentrating on survival. The only extent to which they were political is that they were aware about Hitler, Nazism and anti-Semitism, and Roosevelt and the New Deal, since poor people understood that Roosevelt was helping them in some way. Sometimes people ask me how my Jewishness has affected my radical political beliefs, and I say “slightly.” My radical political beliefs come from many sources. But you can’t say being a Jew has absolutely no effect on your thinking.

Did you ever experience anti-Semitism?
I knew anti-Semitism existed and that sometimes people looked upon Jews in a different way, but I never experienced anything overt. I suppose a lot of it had to do with living in a Jewish neighborhood. Before I went into the military I spent three years working in the Brooklyn Navy Yard, where I was a little more aware of being Jewish because the shipbuilding industry had few Jews. It wasn’t like the garment industry. There was not overt anti-Semitism, but I knew that the German guy I worked with was conscious of the fact that I was Jewish.

Then Zinn answers questions about Israel itself, which he calls, in retrospect, a mistake.

How did you react to Israel’s creation in 1948?
I didn’t know a lot about it, but I remember speaking at some gathering to celebrate its founding. I wasn’t a Zionist. I just vaguely knew that a Jewish state was being created and that seemed like a good thing. I had no idea that the Jews were coming into an area occupied by Palestinians.

Were you critical of Israel before 1967?
Before 1967 Israel did not loom large in my consciousness. I was aware that there was a war between Israel and the Arab states in 1956, but it really wasn’t until 1967 and the taking of the occupied territories that I realized this was a serious problem. I remember reading I.F. Stone, who was very concerned with Israel.

How do you discuss Israel and Palestine with Jews who might be resistant to claims that Israel bears some responsibility for the conflict?
As always in very complicated issues where emotions come to the fore quickly, I try to first acknowledge the other party’s feelings. In the case of Israel I try to say, yes, I understand your sympathy for a Jewish state, and I understand that you become angry when rockets fall [in Sderot] or when a suicide bomber takes needless life. But that has to be seen in proportion. I try to appeal to the experience of Jews, the experience of the Holocaust, by saying, if it’s never again, it’s not just never again for Jews, it’s never again for anybody. I also try to present facts that are hard to put aside. Rockets from Gaza killed three Israelis; Israelis retaliated with an enormous bombardment that killed 1,000 people. You can’t simply write that off or say, well, they’re morally equivalent or it was bad on both sides. Or the Lebanese send rockets into Israel, killing a number of people, and the Israelis invade Lebanon in 1982 and there are 14,000 civilian casualties. These are horrors inflicted by a Jewish state. As a Jew I feel ashamed when I read these things…I [also] try to appeal to what I think are the best legacies of the Jewish people—people like Albert Einstein and Martin Buber, who cannot be simply written off, because they’re Jewish heroes. And these are people who were critical of Israel and sympathetic to Palestinians.

Do you think that Zionism was a mistake?
I think the Jewish State was a mistake, yes. Obviously, it’s too late to go back. It was a mistake to drive the Indians off the American continent, but it’s too late to give it back. At the time, I thought creating Israel was a good thing, but in retrospect, it was probably the worst thing that the Jews could have done. What they did was join the nationalistic frenzy, they became privy to all of the evils that nationalism creates and became very much like the United States—very aggressive, violent and bigoted. When Jews were without a state they were internationalists and they contributed to whatever culture they were part of and produced great things. Jews were known as kindly, talented people. Now, I think, Israel is contributing to anti-Semitism. So I think it was a big mistake.

What’s interesting is that for all his radical and debatable analysis—ignoring a hundred years of PRE-war Zionism and settlement, for instance—Zinn arrives at a conclusion that Netanyahu and most mainstream Zionists and Palestinians putatively share—a two state solution. 

What sort of solution do you want to see when it comes to the resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?
Ideally, there should be a secular state in which Arabs and Jews live together as equals. There are countries around the world where different ethnic groups live side by side. But that is very difficult and therefore the two-state solution seems like the most practical thing, especially since both Jews and Palestinians seem to favor it. It’s odd: All these people on both sides want a two-state solution, but it can’t come into being. The basic problem is the fanaticism of people like Benjamin Netanyahu and people who don’t want to give up the occupied territories. The settlements also pose a real problem. But it’s a problem that’s solvable. It was solved in the agreement with Egypt [when the settlers were removed from Sinai]. This time it’s more serious, but there are ways in which settlers can be compensated or assured of their rights in a Palestinian state as a quid pro quo for the rights of Arabs in the Jewish state.

 
This differs from the one-state solution many on the Left are now promoting, and shows an acceptance of Israel’s legitimacy that many on the Left now refuse to acknowledge.

7 CommentsLeave your comment

COMMENTS

We welcome your feedback. Comments may not exceed 700 characters.

Privacy Policy

Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.

Terms of Service

JewishJournal.com has rules for its commenting community.Get all the details.

Of course it was a mistake. But it’s been done. Now give the Palestinians their land, water and country or continue to act like Nazis imprisoning them in circumstances akin to the Warsaw Ghetto while slowing stealing what is legally and morally theirs. Those are the two choices. By stealing Palestinian land aka “settlements” they are making it ever more difficult, if not impossible, to have their so-called “Jewish” State. Their karma will be either perpetual war, a rogue nuclear attack, or a one State solution in which they the “Jews” are the minority.

Comment by Rad on 3/11/10 at 10:24 pm

Very well put by the Late Howard Zinn. Couldn’t of said it better myself. As an American myself, I want the Palestinians and Jews to be able to live in a peaceful, EQUAL two-state solution. The Israelis have been stealing from the Palestinians since the 67’ war. The Palestinians deserve to be treated as humans beings rightfully so. Not caged in and blocked like animals. This is disgusting. Absoluetly no regard for human life. The settlements have been deemed as illegal and against international law. The 2008 war was a perfect example of hypocrisy to the fullest extent. Instead of bombarding an apartheid nation of people, why not go after the actual terrorist and bring them to justice like a real government would do. Kudos to Rad who posted above me. As an American, I don’t want my country supporting an Israeli government who terrorizes like the ones they blame. Enough is enough. God sees everything…

Comment by David on 3/12/10 at 1:52 am

As Howard Zinn states, if Israel was a mistake, so is the United States of America! In both cases, an example for the world. Predominance in innovation and patents. While he accuses the Americans of genocide against the Indians, the most he can say against Israel is disproportionate response to acts of terror against innocent civilians. The proper solution for that is law and order by adjoining nations. How would the USA react to bombing attacks against Los Angeles and New York! WITH the tolerance and/or encouragement of the governments of Canada and Mexico. Would not we respond. Did not Hiroshima occur? (Some contend that by ending the war, lives were actually saved!)The unmistakable truth is that Israel’s responses are necessary to preserve lives.
In doubting the legitimacy of Israel’s existence and actions (and that of the United States!), Howard Zinn’s views are extremist and lacking rationality.

Comment by Walter on 3/12/10 at 4:57 am

Einstein also was opposed to the establishment of a Jewish State. Read it in “Out of My Later Years” (Einstein in his own words).

It has led to the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. Avrum Berg writes in his book “The Holocaust is Over”... That Israelis’ inability to move on causes their crazy government policies and human rights abuses. Israeli’s need to heed his warning for their own spiritual survival. Einstein worried about the affect on the soul of Jewry of a nationalist state in the Middle East; why he turned down the offer to become its 2nd President.

Comment by John on 3/12/10 at 8:38 am

@ Walter, have you ever hear the saying, ‘two wrongs don’t make a right’?. In this case the Palestinians have every right to fight for their survival, and the Israeli’s as an occupying aggressor, stealing land and water from their victims, have only responsibilities. The Israelis are clearly violating the human rights of the Palestinians on a daily basis and terrorizing them with the help of the US government. Comparing the illegal acts of the Israeli government with those of the US is like trying to exonerate the Bush administration by saying well, ‘Hitler was worse’. Your response is typical of irrational right-wingers who constantly are finding themselves in indefensible untenable positions.

Comment by Rad on 3/12/10 at 4:07 pm

What Zinn said is nonetheless very extensive. I appreciate the effort he had inculcated with regards to his writing. This is definitely an eye opener for me.

Comment by Nidalee Scott on 7/22/10 at 3:19 am

was Zinn’s family related to any of the genocidal Jews in the bolshevik movement?  Could he have been related to Yagoda or Kaganovich or other muderous jews who have been tied to the exterminations of millions of Russian Christians?

Comment by eaglehaslanded on 9/10/11 at 5:16 am

Post a Comment

Name:  
Email:  

Type the word you see below:

Comment:


About this Blog

Blog Home
About the Blogger(s)
Contact

RSS


Blog Archive






Newspaper

Serving a community of 600,000, The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles is the largest Jewish weekly outside New York City. Our award-winning paper reaches over 150,000 educated, involved and affluent readers each week. Subscribe here.

© Copyright 2012 Tribe Media Corp.
All rights reserved. JewishJournal.com is hosted by Nexcess.net. Homepage design by Koret Communications.
Widgets by Mijits. Site construction by Hop Studios.

counter fake hit page