May 1, 2008
We don’t need more gabfests on diversity
The details of the ugly dustup between a leading local Jewish philanthropist, Daphna Ziman, and the local African American head of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the Rev. Eric Lee, are still at issue. Ziman disseminated her account of the encounter in a widely distributed e-mail. She claimed that Lee gave a speech at a local fraternity function rife with anti-Semitic statements. Lee strenuously denied the charges, and no independent corroboration exists. |
But what is of greater interest than what actually transpired at the Kappa Alpha Psi gathering is the response from the leadership of our community to Lee's remarks and what that portends for intergroup relations in this city.
Predictably, the civil rights leadership of our communities seems to be responding to the incident just as they have in the past -- with dialogue groups and resurrected "roundtables" aimed at convincing participants of the value of diversity and of our historic and present commonalities.
What ought to distinguish the response of today from those in the 1970s and 1990s is the context of our very changed society.
Society has caught up and passed well beyond dialogue groups and the need to justify and rationalize the value of diversity. Every major study conducted in this field has revealed an amazing attitude of acceptance of differences by today's young people. As Morley Winograd and Michael Hais observe in their just-published book, "Millennial Makeover," "the great diversity of the Millennial Generation [born between 1982 and 2003] and its experiences growing up in a multiracial society is reflected in their relatively color-blind attitudes on racial relations."
The Pew Center concluded in its multiple surveys of millennials that "they are the most tolerant of any generation on social issues such as immigration, race and homosexuality." One example documented by the Pew Center (dealing with a historically incendiary issue) found that that between 1987 and 2003, attitudes toward interracial dating among 18-25-year-olds underwent a sea change -- those approving such activity rose from 56 percent to 89 percent. Those completely agreeing with interracial dating rose from 20 percent to 64 percent.
The data of a profound change in attitudes is incontestable and is manifested across racial and religious lines. The Reboot study of millennials, "OMG! How Generation Y is Redefining Faith in the iPod Era," found that today's youth are "fully integrated into diverse social networks. While previous generations often lived in homogenous religious communities, among Generation Y [born 1980-2000], only 7 percent of youth report that all their friends are the same religion as themselves. Even the most religious youth maintain diverse networks of peers."
The study oversampled Jewish and black youth to confirm their findings.
Even the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) study of anti-Semitic attitudes indicates a decline in anti-Semitic attitudes among the African American population, historically among the most problematic cohort it surveys. Unfortunately, the ADL study does not disaggregate data for younger blacks and their attitudes.
If one believes the myriad studies that confirm the exceptionally positive trends of the new generation, how should one respond to the Lee incident? More dialogue groups that devolve into vehicles to preach to the converted seems to be what we have in store for us. The Los Angeles County Human Relations Commission and its friends will be busy singing the same old songs.
What ought to inform any actions that grow out of the Lee-Ziman incident is the profound change that has taken and is taking place around us. Young people today don't need a "coalition" to talk about how to live together -- they do it 24/7. Their world isn't circumscribed by their faith, their race or their ethnicity.
Nor should we trudge out the old nostrums and activities and think that the Lees of the world will change their version of history or their attitudes -- nor should we really care. They are not the future, and their historical notions are virtually irrelevant.
Our communities' leadership has to absorb the reality that the next generation of open-minded young people sees diversity as a plus, not as a burden to be overcome. We need to offer them activities that confirm their positive outlook and involve them in doing, not talking, about things, much as Temple Israel's Big Sunday program does -- people working together as equals, improving our community for everyone. We don't need more gabfests or sessions of self-flagellation.
Millennials believe that they live in an exciting time, two-thirds rate their lives as "excellent or pretty good," let's give them reason to confirm those positive attitudes.