February 15, 2007
News from the hood, eruv in the air
David Suissa gets it right when he praises the incredible work of selfless individuals ("Neighborhood Angels," Feb. 2). Through their tireless efforts to feed struggling Jewish families, Yaelle and Nouriel Cohen bring honor not only to themselves but also to their entire community.
In the face of a problem as deeply entrenched as hunger, people like the Cohens are an important part of the answer. But they cannot do it alone.
Alleviating the suffering brought on by economic insecurity will take broad civic participation. In other words, it will take all of us, working together in concert with able community and government leaders, to make the critical difference that will finally end hunger once and for all.
I was quite perturbed by your article, "The Missing Holiday" (Feb. 9). In it, David Suissa seems to imply that the Orthodox community just picks and chooses its holidays. When Orthodox people celebrate a holiday, they do it with true meaning and observe the holiday's laws.
It has been this way since the beginning of time. We do not make up laws and rituals, such as sitting under a tree eating fruit.
Suissa seems to be a big fan of Tu B'Shevat and what it represents, but I wonder if he feels the same way about other holidays that are a little more strenuous than eating fruit. To compare a Tu B'Shevat seder to the Passover seder is like comparing apples to oranges (pun intended).
David, you are better than that.
In a letter published in The Journal, a Mr. Eli Ziv of Woodland Hills accused Jane Ulman's article about the Conejo eruv of tiptoeing around the real issue, which he claims to be a real hatred of traditional Jewish observance, much of it coming from secular Jews ("Questions Remain After Agoura Eruv Dismantled," Feb. 2).
The problem is that Ziv has never been in our Conejo Valley community, did not see the eruv that we commissioned and was not present at the Oak Park Municipal Advisory Council meeting, where I, as the spokesperson for the eruv committee, gave a very sincere apology to the homeowners who had complained.
I don't know what has driven eruv controversies in other communities, but here in Oak Park and Agoura Hills, it was simply a matter of our contractor doing a lousy job and creating an eyesore. The eruv was ugly, and it trespassed on private property.
Nobody made us take it down. That decision was ours, and the bottom line is this: The neighbors had every right to be upset, and we took our eruv down because we agreed with them.
If Ziv and others (i.e., reporters from the Daily News and Ventura County Star and KFI-AM's John and Ken, none of whom were present at the Oak Park meeting) wish to convolute the facts to feed their own agendas, well I suppose I can't stop them.
But I wish they'd all leave us in the Conejo Valley alone to work out our problems amongst ourselves, which we seem to be able to do quite well, thank you.
Your article, in my opinion, was fair and balanced.
In "Time for Leaders to End Their Silence on Iraq" (Feb. 9), Aryeh Cohen's and Adam Rubin's compelling arguments are undermined by unsupported allegations and false statements. They write, "The Bush/Cheney war, launched on the basis of ... outright lies against a country that posed no threat to the United States...."
"Lies" is a strong allegation, yet they do not say who, when, what and how the lies were the basis of launching the war. Iraq fired anti-aircraft missiles at U.S. no-fly-zone forces, plotted to assassinate President George H.W. Bush and supported terrorists (via $25,000 sent to the families of successful suicide bombers) striking against U.S. ally, Israel -- that's hardly "posing no threat".
In 1994, my daughter announced her engagement to her beshert. My engagement gift to the couple was the "Making Marriage Work" course at the University of Judaism ("Premarital Counseling Gets Short Shrift in Jewish L.A.," Feb. 9). It was inestimably meaningful for them both and for their very successful and enduring relationship.
I encourage all of you prospective parents of the bride or groom to invest in maximizing your kids' chances for a happy and successful marriage.
Barbara H. Bergen
The StandWithUs community is a big umbrella that includes people with a wide range of opinions about Israeli policy ("Divided We Fall," Feb. 9). When The Journal uses labels like "conservative," and "left" or "right" wing, it misrepresents all groups' positions, leaves too much to personal interpretation and ignores the significant variations within each label. StandWithUs regularly takes heat from those who consider themselves more conservative or more liberal than our organization.
We did not identify Combatants for Peace as anti-Israel because we are "left" or "right" or because we want to silence criticism of Israel. Simply put, Combatants for Peace presentations are one-sided (blaming only Israel for the ongoing conflict), ignore context (like Palestinian terrorism and extremism) and make unsubstantiated charges against the Israel Defense Forces and Israel.
The StandWithUs mission is to counter, not to silence, such misinformation and unfounded accusations through education, precisely so there can be informed, open debate. Combatants for Peace does not meet this litmus test.
I was a college student when the Jewish State of Israel was born. We Jews were so proud of the founding fathers who issued a declaration of independence, stating that all the citizens of their democracy would be equal and [expressing] a desire that their country would be a "light unto the nations."
However, after almost 60 years of Israel's existence, we see a quasi-theocracy, where non-Orthodox Jews are second-class citizens and government officials consider expelling non-Jews. This can only lead to a Jewish republic, similar to Saudi Arabia's Islamic republic.